Literature DB >> 30443837

Characterization and Cytotoxicity Evaluation of a Marine Sponge Biosilica.

P R Gabbai-Armelin1, H W Kido2, M A Cruz2, J P S Prado2, I R Avanzi2, M R Custódio3, A C M Renno2, R N Granito2.   

Abstract

Bone fractures characterize an important event in the medical healthcare, being related to traumas, aging, and diseases. In critical conditions, such as extensive bone loss and osteoporosis, the tissue restoration may be compromised and culminate in a non-union consolidation. In this context, the osteogenic properties of biomaterials with a natural origin have gained prominence. Particularly, marine sponges are promising organisms that can be exploited as biomaterials for bone grafts. Thus, the objectives of this study were to study the physicochemical and morphological properties of biosilica (BS) from sponges by using scanning electron microscopy, Fourier-transform infrared, X-ray diffraction (SEM, FTIR and XRD respectively), mineralization, and pH. In addition, tests on an osteoblast precursor cell line (MC3T3-E1) were performed to investigate its cytotoxicity and proliferation in presence of BS. Bioglass (BG) was used as gold standard material for comparison purposes. Sponge BS was obtained, and this fact was proven by SEM, FTIR, and XRD analysis. Calcium assay showed a progressive release of this ion from day 7 and a more balanced pH for BS was maintained compared to BG. Cytotoxicity assay indicated that BS had a positive influence on MC3T3-E1 cells viability and qRT-PCR showed that this material stimulated Runx2 and BMP4 gene expressions. Taken together, the results indicate a potential use of sponge biosilica for tissue engineering applications.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bioglass; Biosilica; Bone repair; Cytotoxicity; Porifera

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30443837     DOI: 10.1007/s10126-018-9858-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mar Biotechnol (NY)        ISSN: 1436-2228            Impact factor:   3.619


  47 in total

1.  Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(-Delta Delta C(T)) Method.

Authors:  K J Livak; T D Schmittgen
Journal:  Methods       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 3.608

2.  Nanostructural features of demosponge biosilica.

Authors:  James C Weaver; Lía I Pietrasanta; Niklas Hedin; Bradley F Chmelka; Paul K Hansma; Daniel E Morse
Journal:  J Struct Biol       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 2.867

3.  Structural characterization of siliceous spicules from marine sponges.

Authors:  Gianluca Croce; Alberto Frache; Marco Milanesio; Leonardo Marchese; Mauro Causà; Davide Viterbo; Alessia Barbaglia; Vera Bolis; Giorgio Bavestrello; Carlo Cerrano; Umberto Benatti; Marina Pozzolini; Marco Giovine; Heinz Amenitsch
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 4.033

4.  The story of Bioglass.

Authors:  Larry L Hench
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2006-11-22       Impact factor: 3.896

Review 5.  How useful is SBF in predicting in vivo bone bioactivity?

Authors:  Tadashi Kokubo; Hiroaki Takadama
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2006-01-31       Impact factor: 12.479

Review 6.  Signaling and transcriptional regulation in osteoblast commitment and differentiation.

Authors:  Wei Huang; Shuying Yang; Jianzhong Shao; Yi-Ping Li
Journal:  Front Biosci       Date:  2007-05-01

7.  Perlecan domain I promotes fibroblast growth factor 2 delivery in collagen I fibril scaffolds.

Authors:  W D Yang; R R Gomes; M Alicknavitch; M C Farach-Carson; D D Carson
Journal:  Tissue Eng       Date:  2005 Jan-Feb

Review 8.  Molecular aspects of fracture healing: which are the important molecules?

Authors:  Eleftherios Tsiridis; Neil Upadhyay; Peter Giannoudis
Journal:  Injury       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 2.586

9.  In vitro osteogenesis on a highly bioactive glass-ceramic (Biosilicate).

Authors:  João Moura; Lucas Novaes Teixeira; Christian Ravagnani; Oscar Peitl; Edgar Dutra Zanotto; Márcio Mateus Beloti; Heitor Panzeri; Adalberto Luiz Rosa; Paulo Tambasco de Oliveira
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res A       Date:  2007-09-01       Impact factor: 4.396

10.  In vivo bone and soft tissue response to injectable, biodegradable oligo(poly(ethylene glycol) fumarate) hydrogels.

Authors:  Heungsoo Shin; P Quinten Ruhé; Antonios G Mikos; John A Jansen
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 12.479

View more
  2 in total

1.  3D Printing of PLLA/Biomineral Composite Bone Tissue Engineering Scaffolds.

Authors:  Fangli Gang; Weilong Ye; Chunyang Ma; Wenting Wang; Yi Xiao; Chang Liu; Xiaodan Sun
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-17       Impact factor: 3.748

Review 2.  Novel Drug and Gene Delivery System and Imaging Agent Based on Marine Diatom Biosilica Nanoparticles.

Authors:  Hanaa Ali Hussein; Muhammad Shahid Nazir; Nizakat Azra; Zeenat Qamar; Azman Seeni; Tengku Ahmad Damitri Al-Astani Tengku Din; Mohd Azmuddin Abdullah
Journal:  Mar Drugs       Date:  2022-07-27       Impact factor: 6.085

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.