H Baradaran1,2, K Al-Dasuqi1, A Knight-Greenfield1, A Giambrone1,2,3,4, D Delgado5, E J Ebani1, H Kamel2,3,6, A Gupta7. 1. From the Department of Radiology (H.B., K.A.-D., A.K.-G., E.J.E., A.G.). 2. Clinical and Translational Neuroscience Unit (H.B., H.K., A.G.). 3. Feil Family Brain and Mind Research Institute (H.K., A.G.). 4. Department of Healthcare Policy and Research (A.G.). 5. Samuel J. Wood Library and C.V. Starr Biomedical Information Center (D.D.). 6. Department of Neurology (H.K.), Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York. 7. From the Department of Radiology (H.B., K.A.-D., A.K.-G., E.J.E., A.G.) ajg9004@med.cornell.edu.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: CTA is a widely available imaging examination that may allow the evaluation of high-risk carotid plaque features. PURPOSE: Our aim was to evaluate the association between specific carotid plaque features on CTA and ipsilateral cerebrovascular ischemia. DATA SOURCES: We performed a systematic review of Ovid MEDLINE, Ovid Embase, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library from inception to March 2016 for articles that evaluated the relationship between CTA-detected carotid plaque features and ischemic events, defined as ipsilateral ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack. STUDY SELECTION: Sixteen studies were ultimately included after screening 12,557. DATA ANALYSIS: Two readers recorded data from each study and assessed the study quality with all disagreements resolved by a third reader. A random-effects OR was used to evaluate the association between cerebrovascular ischemia and each of the evaluated plaque features. DATA SYNTHESIS: We found significant positive relationships with cerebrovascular ischemia for the presence of soft plaque (OR, 2.9; 95% CI, 1.4-6.0), plaque ulceration (OR, 2.2; 95% CI, 1.4-3.4), and increased common carotid artery wall thickness (OR, 6.2; 95% CI, 2.5-15.6). We found a significant negative relationship between calcified plaque and ipsilateral ischemia (OR, 0.5; 95% CI, 0.4-0.7). LIMITATIONS: We found heterogeneity in the existing literature secondary to lack of standardized plaque features and clinical definitions. CONCLUSIONS: Soft plaque, plaque ulceration, and increased common carotid artery wall thickness on CTA are associated with ipsilateral cerebrovascular ischemia, while calcified plaque is negatively associated with downstream ischemic events.
BACKGROUND: CTA is a widely available imaging examination that may allow the evaluation of high-risk carotid plaque features. PURPOSE: Our aim was to evaluate the association between specific carotid plaque features on CTA and ipsilateral cerebrovascular ischemia. DATA SOURCES: We performed a systematic review of Ovid MEDLINE, Ovid Embase, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library from inception to March 2016 for articles that evaluated the relationship between CTA-detected carotid plaque features and ischemic events, defined as ipsilateral ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack. STUDY SELECTION: Sixteen studies were ultimately included after screening 12,557. DATA ANALYSIS: Two readers recorded data from each study and assessed the study quality with all disagreements resolved by a third reader. A random-effects OR was used to evaluate the association between cerebrovascular ischemia and each of the evaluated plaque features. DATA SYNTHESIS: We found significant positive relationships with cerebrovascular ischemia for the presence of soft plaque (OR, 2.9; 95% CI, 1.4-6.0), plaque ulceration (OR, 2.2; 95% CI, 1.4-3.4), and increased common carotid artery wall thickness (OR, 6.2; 95% CI, 2.5-15.6). We found a significant negative relationship between calcified plaque and ipsilateral ischemia (OR, 0.5; 95% CI, 0.4-0.7). LIMITATIONS: We found heterogeneity in the existing literature secondary to lack of standardized plaque features and clinical definitions. CONCLUSIONS: Soft plaque, plaque ulceration, and increased common carotid artery wall thickness on CTA are associated with ipsilateral cerebrovascular ischemia, while calcified plaque is negatively associated with downstream ischemic events.
Authors: M Miralles; J Merino; M Busto; X Perich; C Barranco; F Vidal-Barraquer Journal: Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg Date: 2006-09-18 Impact factor: 7.069
Authors: D F Stroup; J A Berlin; S C Morton; I Olkin; G D Williamson; D Rennie; D Moher; B J Becker; T A Sipe; S B Thacker Journal: JAMA Date: 2000-04-19 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: A C van Dijk; M T B Truijman; B Hussain; T Zadi; G Saiedie; A A J de Rotte; M I Liem; A F W van der Steen; M J A P Daemen; P J Koudstaal; P J Nederkoorn; J Hendrikse; M E Kooi; A van der Lugt Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2015-08-06 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: Wael E Shaalan; Hongwei Cheng; Bruce Gewertz; James F McKinsey; Lewis B Schwartz; Daniel Katz; Dindcai Cao; Tina Desai; Seymour Glagov; Hisham S Bassiouny Journal: J Vasc Surg Date: 2004-08 Impact factor: 4.268
Authors: Jochen M Grimm; Andreas Schindler; Florian Schwarz; Clemens C Cyran; Anna Bayer-Karpinska; Tobias Freilinger; Chun Yuan; Jennifer Linn; Miguel Trelles; Maximilian F Reiser; Konstantin Nikolaou; Tobias Saam Journal: J Cardiovasc Magn Reson Date: 2014-10-07 Impact factor: 5.364
Authors: L Saba; H Chen; R Cau; G D Rubeis; G Zhu; F Pisu; B Jang; G Lanzino; J S Suri; Y Qi; M Wintermark Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2022-02 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: John C Benson; Valentina Nardi; Melanie C Bois; Luca Saba; Waleed Brinjikji; Luis Savastano; Giuseppe Lanzino; Amir Lerman Journal: Interv Neuroradiol Date: 2021-08-16 Impact factor: 1.764
Authors: Valentina Nardi; John C Benson; Anthony S Larson; Waleed Brinjikji; Luca Saba; Fredric B Meyer; Giuseppe Lanzino; Amir Lerman; Luis E Savastano Journal: Stroke Vasc Neurol Date: 2022-03-03