L Saba1, H Chen2, R Cau3, G D Rubeis4, G Zhu2, F Pisu3, B Jang2, G Lanzino5, J S Suri6, Y Qi7, M Wintermark2. 1. From the Department of Radiology (L.S., R.C., F.P.), Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria di Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy lucasaba@tiscali.it. 2. Department of Radiology (H.C., G.Z., B.J., M.W.), Division of Neuroradiology, Stanford University Hospital, Stanford, California. 3. From the Department of Radiology (L.S., R.C., F.P.), Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria di Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy. 4. Department of Radiology, UOC of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology (G.D.R.), San Camillo-Forlanini Hospital, Rome, Italy. 5. Department of Neurologic Surgery (G.L.), Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota. 6. Stroke Monitoring and Diagnostic Division (J.S.S.), AtheroPoint, Roseville, California. 7. Department of Xuanwu Hospital (Y.Q.), Capital Medical University, Beijing, Chin.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: CT is considered the standard reference both for quantification and characterization of carotid artery calcifications. Our aim was to investigate the relationship among different types of calcium configurations detected with CT within the plaque with a novel classification and to investigate the prevalence of cerebrovascular events. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Seven hundred ninety patients (men = 332; mean age, 69.7 [SD, 13] years; 508 symptomatic for cerebrovascular symptoms and 282 asymptomatic) who underwent computed tomography of the carotid arteries were retrospectively included in this institutional review board-approved study. The plaque was classified into 6 types according to the different types of calcium configurations as the following: type 1, complete absence of calcification within the plaque; type 2, intimal or superficial calcifications; type 3, deep or bulky calcifications; type 4, adventitial calcifications with internal soft plaque of <2 mm thickness; type 5, mixed patterns with intimal and bulky calcifications; and type 6, positive rim sign. RESULTS: The highest prevalence of cerebrovascular events was observed for type 6, for which 89 of the 99 cases were symptomatic. Type 6 plaque had the highest degree of correlation with TIA, stroke, symptoms, and ipsilateral infarct for both sides with a higher prevalence in younger patients. The frequency of symptoms observed by configuration type significantly differed between right and left plaques, with symptoms observed more frequently in type 6 calcification on the right side (50/53; 94%) than on the left side (39/46; 85%, P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: We propose a novel carotid artery plaque configuration classification that is associated with the prevalence of cerebrovascular events. If confirmed in longitudinal analysis, this classification could be used to stratify the risk of occurrence of ischemic events.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: CT is considered the standard reference both for quantification and characterization of carotid artery calcifications. Our aim was to investigate the relationship among different types of calcium configurations detected with CT within the plaque with a novel classification and to investigate the prevalence of cerebrovascular events. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Seven hundred ninety patients (men = 332; mean age, 69.7 [SD, 13] years; 508 symptomatic for cerebrovascular symptoms and 282 asymptomatic) who underwent computed tomography of the carotid arteries were retrospectively included in this institutional review board-approved study. The plaque was classified into 6 types according to the different types of calcium configurations as the following: type 1, complete absence of calcification within the plaque; type 2, intimal or superficial calcifications; type 3, deep or bulky calcifications; type 4, adventitial calcifications with internal soft plaque of <2 mm thickness; type 5, mixed patterns with intimal and bulky calcifications; and type 6, positive rim sign. RESULTS: The highest prevalence of cerebrovascular events was observed for type 6, for which 89 of the 99 cases were symptomatic. Type 6 plaque had the highest degree of correlation with TIA, stroke, symptoms, and ipsilateral infarct for both sides with a higher prevalence in younger patients. The frequency of symptoms observed by configuration type significantly differed between right and left plaques, with symptoms observed more frequently in type 6 calcification on the right side (50/53; 94%) than on the left side (39/46; 85%, P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: We propose a novel carotid artery plaque configuration classification that is associated with the prevalence of cerebrovascular events. If confirmed in longitudinal analysis, this classification could be used to stratify the risk of occurrence of ischemic events.
Authors: Kiran R Nandalur; Andrew D Hardie; Prashant Raghavan; Matthew J Schipper; Erol Baskurt; Christopher M Kramer Journal: Stroke Date: 2007-02-01 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: L Saba; C Yuan; T S Hatsukami; N Balu; Y Qiao; J K DeMarco; T Saam; A R Moody; D Li; C C Matouk; M H Johnson; H R Jäger; M Mossa-Basha; M E Kooi; Z Fan; D Saloner; M Wintermark; D J Mikulis; B A Wasserman Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2018-01-11 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: Quirijn J A van den Bouwhuijsen; Daniel Bos; M Arfan Ikram; Albert Hofman; Gabriel P Krestin; Oscar H Franco; Aad van der Lugt; Meike W Vernooij Journal: Cerebrovasc Dis Date: 2015-05-07 Impact factor: 2.762
Authors: J C Benson; S Payabvash; S Mortazavi; L Zhang; P Salazar; B Hoffman; M Oswood; A M McKinney Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2016-08-18 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: Luca Saba; Tobias Saam; H Rolf Jäger; Chun Yuan; Thomas S Hatsukami; David Saloner; Bruce A Wasserman; Leo H Bonati; Max Wintermark Journal: Lancet Neurol Date: 2019-04-04 Impact factor: 44.182
Authors: Hunter R Underhill; Thomas S Hatsukami; Zahi A Fayad; Valentin Fuster; Chun Yuan Journal: Nat Rev Cardiol Date: 2010-01-26 Impact factor: 32.419
Authors: L Saba; W Brinjikji; J D Spence; M Wintermark; M Castillo; G J de Borst; Q Yang; C Yuan; A Buckler; M Edjlali; T Saam; D Saloner; B K Lal; D Capodanno; J Sun; N Balu; R Naylor; A V D Lugt; B A Wasserman; M E Kooi; J Wardlaw; J Gillard; G Lanzino; U Hedin; D Mikulis; A Gupta; J K DeMarco; C Hess; J V Goethem; T Hatsukami; P Rothwell; M M Brown; A R Moody Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2021-07-29 Impact factor: 4.966