Gioia Mura1, Mauro G Carta2, Federica Sancassiani2, Sergio Machado3,4,5, Luca Prosperini6,7. 1. Department of Medical Sciences and Public Health, University of Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy - mura.gioia@virgilio.it. 2. Department of Medical Sciences and Public Health, University of Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy. 3. Laboratory of Panic and Respiration, Institute of Psychiatry, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro (IPUB/UFRJ), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. 4. National Institute of Translational Medicine (INCT-TM), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. 5. Department of Physical Activity Neuroscience, Salgado de Oliveira University, Niterói, Brazil. 6. Department of Neurology and Psychiatry, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy. 7. Unit of Neurology, S. Camillo-Forlanini Hospital, Rome, Italy.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Exergames represent a way to perform physical activity through active video games, serving as potentially useful tool in the field of neurorehabilitation. However, little is known regarding the possible role of exergames in improving cognitive functions in persons suffering from neurological disabilities. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: A search for relevant articles was carried out on PubMed/Medline, Scopus, PEDro, and Google Scholar. Only randomized controlled studies and non-randomized but controlled studies were retained. The following additional inclusion criteria were applied: studies focused on physical activity interventions carried out by means of exergames; populations targeted were affected by neurological disabilities; and reported results were related to cognitive outcomes. We calculated standardized mean differences (SMD) and pooled results using a random effects meta-analysis. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: Of 520 abstracts screened, thirteen studies met the criteria to be included yielding a total of 465 participants, 233 randomized to exergames, and 232 allocated to the alternative or no intervention. The included studies varied in terms of studied populations (e.g., multiple sclerosis, post-stroke hemiparesis, Parkinson's disease, dementia, dyslexia, Down syndrome), type and duration of interventions, and cognitive outcome measures. Exergames significantly improved executive functions (SMD=0.53, P=0.005; 8 studies, N.=380) and visuo-spatial perception (SMD=0.65, P<0.0001; 5 studies, N.=209) when compared to the alternative or no intervention. There were no significant differences for attention (SMD=0.57, P=0.07; 7 studies, N.=250) and global cognition (SMD=0.05, P=0.80; 6 studies, N.=161). CONCLUSIONS: Exergames are a highly-flexible tool for rehabilitation of both cognitive and motor functions in adult populations suffering from various neurological disabilities and developmental neurological disorders. Additional high-quality clinical trials with larger samples and more specific cognitive outcomes are needed to corroborate these preliminary findings. CLINICAL REHABILITATION IMPACT: Exergames could be considered either as a supplemental treatment to conventional rehabilitation, or as strategy to extend benefits of conventional programs at home.
INTRODUCTION: Exergames represent a way to perform physical activity through active video games, serving as potentially useful tool in the field of neurorehabilitation. However, little is known regarding the possible role of exergames in improving cognitive functions in persons suffering from neurological disabilities. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: A search for relevant articles was carried out on PubMed/Medline, Scopus, PEDro, and Google Scholar. Only randomized controlled studies and non-randomized but controlled studies were retained. The following additional inclusion criteria were applied: studies focused on physical activity interventions carried out by means of exergames; populations targeted were affected by neurological disabilities; and reported results were related to cognitive outcomes. We calculated standardized mean differences (SMD) and pooled results using a random effects meta-analysis. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: Of 520 abstracts screened, thirteen studies met the criteria to be included yielding a total of 465 participants, 233 randomized to exergames, and 232 allocated to the alternative or no intervention. The included studies varied in terms of studied populations (e.g., multiple sclerosis, post-stroke hemiparesis, Parkinson's disease, dementia, dyslexia, Down syndrome), type and duration of interventions, and cognitive outcome measures. Exergames significantly improved executive functions (SMD=0.53, P=0.005; 8 studies, N.=380) and visuo-spatial perception (SMD=0.65, P<0.0001; 5 studies, N.=209) when compared to the alternative or no intervention. There were no significant differences for attention (SMD=0.57, P=0.07; 7 studies, N.=250) and global cognition (SMD=0.05, P=0.80; 6 studies, N.=161). CONCLUSIONS: Exergames are a highly-flexible tool for rehabilitation of both cognitive and motor functions in adult populations suffering from various neurological disabilities and developmental neurological disorders. Additional high-quality clinical trials with larger samples and more specific cognitive outcomes are needed to corroborate these preliminary findings. CLINICAL REHABILITATION IMPACT: Exergames could be considered either as a supplemental treatment to conventional rehabilitation, or as strategy to extend benefits of conventional programs at home.
Authors: Kirk I Erickson; Charles Hillman; Chelsea M Stillman; Rachel M Ballard; Bonny Bloodgood; David E Conroy; Richard Macko; David X Marquez; Steven J Petruzzello; Kenneth E Powell Journal: Med Sci Sports Exerc Date: 2019-06 Impact factor: 5.411
Authors: Alexandra Schättin; Stephan Häfliger; Alain Meyer; Barbara Früh; Sonja Böckler; Yannic Hungerbühler; Eling D de Bruin; Sebastian Frese; Regula Steinlin Egli; Ulrich Götz; René Bauer; Anna Lisa Martin-Niedecken Journal: JMIR Serious Games Date: 2021-05-07 Impact factor: 4.143
Authors: Alessandro Oliveira de Carvalho; Alberto Souza Sá Filho; Eric Murillo-Rodriguez; Nuno Barbosa Rocha; Mauro Giovanni Carta; Sergio Machado Journal: Clin Pract Epidemiol Ment Health Date: 2018-03-30
Authors: Marcello De Angelis; Luigi Lavorgna; Antonio Carotenuto; Martina Petruzzo; Roberta Lanzillo; Vincenzo Brescia Morra; Marcello Moccia Journal: J Clin Med Date: 2021-05-26 Impact factor: 4.241
Authors: Emerald Jenkins; Binu Koirala; Tamar Rodney; Ji Won Lee; Valerie T Cotter; Sarah L Szanton; Janiece L Taylor Journal: Geriatr Nurs Date: 2021-07-16 Impact factor: 2.525
Authors: Kathryn Wall; Jessica Stark; Alexa Schillaci; Emilie T Saulnier; Elizabeth McLaren; Kristina Striegnitz; Brian D Cohen; Paul J Arciero; Arthur F Kramer; Cay Anderson-Hanley Journal: J Clin Med Date: 2018-08-30 Impact factor: 4.241