| Literature DB >> 29068373 |
Agata Paneth1, Tomasz Frączek2, Agnieszka Grzegorczyk3, Dominika Janowska4, Anna Malm5, Piotr Paneth6.
Abstract
Using molecular modeling approach, potential antibacterial agents with triazole core were proposed. A moderate to weak level of antibacterial activity in most of the compounds have been observed, with best minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) value of 0.003 mg/mL, as shown by the 15 against S. epidermidis. Studied compounds were also submitted to the antifungal assay. The best antifungal activity was detected for 16 with MIC at 0.125 and 0.25 mg/mL against C. albicans and C. parapsilosis, respectively.Entities:
Keywords: antibacterial activity; molecular modeling; triazoles
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 29068373 PMCID: PMC6150362 DOI: 10.3390/molecules22111808
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.411
Figure 1General structures of our recently reported triazole non-nucleoside reverse-transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTIs) [6] and thiophene-2-carboxylic acid derivative (12) with inhibitory activity against RNA polymerase (RNAP) [14].
Figure 2Docking scores for previously reported triazole NNRTIs (1–11) [6], known bacterial RNA polymerase inhibitor (12) [14], and designed triazoles with the N-(2-nitrophenyl)acetamide core (13–16) within bacterial RNAP “switch region”.
Figure 3Binding mode of 2 within bacterial RNAP “switch region”.
Figure 4Molecular electrostatic potential (MEP) of 2 and 12.
Scheme 1Synthetic route for triazoles (2, 4, 13–16).
Antimicrobial data (minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) and minimum bactericidal concentration (MBC), mg/mL) for 2, 4, 13–16.
| 2 | 4 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | Control * | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1; >1 | n.a. | 0.5; 2 | n.a. | 0.5; >1 | 1; >1 | 0.24; 0.24 | |
| n.a. | 1; >1 | 0.25; 1 | n.a. | 1; >1 | 0.25; >1 | 0.24; 0.24 | |
| n.a. | n.a. | 0.25; >1 | 0.5; >1 | 0.5; >1 | 0.5; >1 | 0.49; 0.49 | |
| 1; >1 | 1; >1 | 0.06; 0.125 | 0.5; 2 | 0.003; 1 | 0.5; >1 | 0.49; 0.49 | |
| 1; >1 | 0.125; 1 | 0.125; 1 | 1; >1 | 1; >1 | 0.25; >1 | 0.03; 012 | |
| 1; >1 | 1; >1 | 0.5; >1 | 1; >1 | 0.5; >1 | 1; >1 | 0.12; 0.12 | |
| 1; 2 | 1; >1 | 0.125; 0.5 | 1; >1 | 1; >1 | 0.5; >1 | 0.98; 1.95 | |
| 1; >1 | n.a. | 1; >1 | 1; >1 | n.a. | 1; >1 | 0.015; 0.015 | |
| 1; >1 | n.a. | 1; >1 | 1; >1 | n.a. | 1; >1 | 0.008; 0.008 | |
| 1; >1 | n.a. | 1; >1 | 1; >1 | n.a. | 1; >1 | 0.008; 0.008 | |
| n.a. | n.a. | 1; >1 | n.a. | n.a. | 1; >1 | 0.015; 0.015 | |
| n.a. | n.a. | 1; >1 | n.a. | n.a. | n.a. | 0.015; 0.015 | |
| 1; >1 | 1; >1 | 1; >1 | 1; >1 | 1; >1 | 1; >1 | 0.12; 0.24 | |
| 1; >1 | 0.5; >1 | 0.5; >1 | 0.5; >1 | 0.5; >1 | 0.5; >1 | 0.12; 0.12 | |
| 0.5; 1 | 0.5; 1 | 0.5; 1 | 0.5; 1 | 0.5; 1 | 0.25; 1 | 1.95; 1.95 | |
| 0.5; 1 | 0.5; 0.5 | 0.5; 0.5 | 0.5; 1 | 0.5; 0.5 | 0.125; 0.25 | 0.98; 0.98 | |
| 1; 1 | 1; 1 | 0.5; 1 | 1; 1 | 0.5; 1 | 1; 1 | 0.98; 1.95 | |
* MICs (×10−3) for ciprofloxacin (antibacterial assay) and fluconazole (antifungal assay).