| Literature DB >> 29067311 |
Stavros I Dimitriadis1,2,3,4, Ioannis Tarnanas5,6, Mark Wiederhold7, Brenda Wiederhold8, Magda Tsolaki6, Elgar Fleisch5,9.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: We sought to identify whether intensive 10-week mobile health mnemonic strategy training (MST) could shift the resting-state brain network more toward cortical-level integration, which has recently been proven to reflect the reorganization of the brain networks compensating the cognitive decline.Entities:
Keywords: Augmented reality; Brain plasticity; Cognitive function; Cognitive training; Intrinsic coupling modes; Older adults; Physical activity
Year: 2016 PMID: 29067311 PMCID: PMC5651360 DOI: 10.1016/j.trci.2016.08.004
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Alzheimers Dement (N Y) ISSN: 2352-8737
Fig. 1Topographies of intervention-induced significant cortical networks of cross-frequency coupling (CFC) at resting state by adopting a phase-amplitude coupling (PAC) estimator. We found a significant increase at the frontal, medial temporal, and inferior parietal cortex synchronization for the MST group after the intervention for the pairs α1:γ, α2:γ, and β:γ. NSG, novel serious game.
Fig. 2Density of intervention-induced significant functional cortical networks for each PAC pair and for both groups. The results represent the group values before and after intervention. Density is defined as the number of surviving connections divided by the total number of possible connections among 305 cortical sources. NSG, novel serious game.
Fig. 3Intervention-induced significant cortical networks of causal cross-frequency couplings estimated with dSTE between frontalθ brain areas and parietalα2. R, right; ACC, anterior cingulate cortex; L, left; SPC, superior parietal cortex; IFG, inferior frontal gyrus; SMG, supramarginal gyrus; MFG, medial frontal gyrus; DLPFC, dorsolateral prefrontal cortex. ∗P < .001 with Wilcoxon rank sum test.
Fig. 4Intervention-induced significant cortical networks of correlations corr over orthogonalized envelopes of β frequency between (A) L-MFG and L-IFG and (B) L-TG and L-IFG. L, left; MFG, middle frontal gyrus; IFG, inferior frontal gyrus; TG, temporal gyrus. ∗P < .001 with Wilcoxon rank sum test.
GCE for the four PAC frequency pairs in both groups before and after intervention
| GCE/PAC frequency pairs | NSG | AC | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| M0 | M3 | M0 | M3 | |
| θ:β | 0.02 ± 0.07 | 0.05 ± 0.29∗∗∗ | 0.10 ± 0.06 | 0.20 ± 0.07∗∗∗ |
| γ:α1 | 0.06 ± 0.23 | 0.12 ± 0.62∗∗∗ | 0.29 ± 0.09 | 0.35 ± 0.14 |
| γ:α2 | 0.07 ± 0.26 | 0.14 ± 0.66∗∗∗ | 0.31 ± 0.12 | 0.37 ± 0.13 |
| γ:β | 0.09 ± 0.42 | 0.13 ± 0.61∗∗∗ | 0.01 ± 0.51 | 0.09 ± 0.61 |
Abbreviations: GCE, global cost efficiency; PAC, phase-amplitude coupling; NSG, novel serious game; AC, active control.
∗∗∗P < .0001.
Correlation r of the most significant neuropsychological measurements for the NSG group before and after intervention with GCE presented for PAC frequency pairs where an improvement was detected
| NSG | ||
|---|---|---|
| M0 | M3 | |
| MMSE | ||
| Global | r = 0.07α1−γ∗∗∗ | r = 0.33α1−γ∗∗∗ |
| CVLT | ||
| Immediate recall | r = 0.10θ−β∗∗∗ | r = 0.34θ−β∗∗∗ |
| Delayed recall | r = 0.06α1−γ∗∗∗ | r = 0.36α1−γ∗∗∗ |
| Perseveration errors | r = −0.09θ−β∗∗∗ | r = −0.23θ−β∗∗∗ |
| Executive functions | ||
| TMT-B | r = −0.05α1−γ∗∗∗ | r = −0.31α1−γ∗∗ |
| Attention | ||
| Direct span | r = 0.05α1−γ∗∗ | r = 0.32α2−γ∗∗∗ |
| Reverse span | r = 0.06α1−γ∗∗∗ | r = 0.26α1−γ∗∗∗ |
| Total score | r = 0.05β−γ∗∗∗ | r = 0.32β−γ∗∗∗ |
Abbreviations: NSG, novel serious game; GCE, global cost efficiency; PAC, phase-amplitude coupling; MMSE, Mini-Mental State Examination; CVLT, California Verbal Learning Test; TMT-B, Trail-Making Test, part B.
∗∗P < .001; ∗∗∗P < .0001.