Nolan Priedigkeit1, Ryan J Hartmaier2, Yijing Chen3, Damir Vareslija4, Ahmed Basudan5, Rebecca J Watters6, Roby Thomas7, Jose P Leone8, Peter C Lucas9, Rohit Bhargava9, Ronald L Hamilton10, Juliann Chmielecki2, Shannon L Puhalla11, Nancy E Davidson11, Steffi Oesterreich6, Adam M Brufsky11, Leonie Young4, Adrian V Lee12. 1. Department of Pharmacology and Chemical Biology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania2Women's Cancer Research Center, University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania3Magee-Women's Research Institute, Magee-Women's Research Hospital of University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania4Medical Scientist Training Program, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. 2. Foundation Medicine, Cambridge, Massachusetts. 3. Women's Cancer Research Center, University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania3Magee-Women's Research Institute, Magee-Women's Research Hospital of University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. 4. Endocrine Oncology Research Group, Department of Surgery, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, Ireland. 5. Women's Cancer Research Center, University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania3Magee-Women's Research Institute, Magee-Women's Research Hospital of University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania7Department of Human Genetics, University of Pittsburgh Graduate School of Public Health, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. 6. Department of Pharmacology and Chemical Biology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania2Women's Cancer Research Center, University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania3Magee-Women's Research Institute, Magee-Women's Research Hospital of University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. 7. Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. 8. Holden Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City. 9. Women's Cancer Research Center, University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania3Magee-Women's Research Institute, Magee-Women's Research Hospital of University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania10Department of Pathology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. 10. Department of Pathology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. 11. Women's Cancer Research Center, University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania3Magee-Women's Research Institute, Magee-Women's Research Hospital of University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania8Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. 12. Department of Pharmacology and Chemical Biology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania2Women's Cancer Research Center, University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania3Magee-Women's Research Institute, Magee-Women's Research Hospital of University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania7Department of Human Genetics, University of Pittsburgh Graduate School of Public Health, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Abstract
IMPORTANCE: Patients with breast cancer (BrCa) brain metastases (BrM) have limited therapeutic options. A better understanding of molecular alterations acquired in BrM could identify clinically actionable metastatic dependencies. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether there are intrinsic subtype differences between primary tumors and matched BrM and to uncover BrM-acquired alterations that are clinically actionable. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: In total, 20 cases of primary breast cancer tissue and resected BrM (10 estrogen receptor [ER]-negative and 10 ER-positive) from 2 academic institutions were included. Eligible cases in the discovery cohort harbored patient-matched primary breast cancer tissue and resected BrM. Given the rarity of patient-matched samples, no exclusion criteria were enacted. Two validation sequencing cohorts were used-a published data set of 17 patient-matched cases of BrM and a cohort of 7884 BrCa tumors enriched for metastatic samples. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Brain metastases expression changes in 127 genes within BrCa signatures, PAM50 assignments, and ERBB2/HER2 DNA-level gains. RESULTS: Overall, 17 of 20 BrM retained the PAM50 subtype of the primary BrCa. Despite this concordance, 17 of 20 BrM harbored expression changes (<2-fold or >2-fold) in clinically actionable genes including gains of FGFR4 (n = 6 [30%]), FLT1 (n = 4 [20%]), AURKA (n = 2 [10%]) and loss of ESR1 expression (n = 9 [45%]). The most recurrent expression gain was ERBB2/HER2, which showed a greater than 2-fold expression increase in 7 of 20 BrM (35%). Three of these 7 cases were ERBB2/HER2-negative out of 13 ERBB2/HER2-negative in the primary BrCa cohort and became immunohistochemical positive (3+) in the paired BrM with metastasis-specific amplification of the ERBB2/HER2 locus. In an independent data set, 2 of 9 (22.2%) ERBB2/HER2-negative BrCa switched to ERBB2/HER2-positive with 1 BrM acquiring ERBB2/HER2 amplification and the other showing metastatic enrichment of the activating V777L ERBB2/HER2 mutation. An expanded cohort revealed that ERBB2/HER2 amplification and/or mutation frequency was unchanged between local disease and metastases across all sites; however, a significant enrichment was appreciated for BrM (13% local vs 24% BrM; P < .001). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Breast cancer BrM commonly acquire alterations in clinically actionable genes, with metastasis-acquired ERBB2/HER2 alterations in approximately 20% of ERBB2/HER2-negative cases. These observations have immediate clinical implications for patients with ERBB2/HER2-negative breast cancer and support comprehensive profiling of metastases to inform clinical care.
IMPORTANCE: Patients with breast cancer (BrCa) brain metastases (BrM) have limited therapeutic options. A better understanding of molecular alterations acquired in BrM could identify clinically actionable metastatic dependencies. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether there are intrinsic subtype differences between primary tumors and matched BrM and to uncover BrM-acquired alterations that are clinically actionable. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: In total, 20 cases of primary breast cancer tissue and resected BrM (10 estrogen receptor [ER]-negative and 10 ER-positive) from 2 academic institutions were included. Eligible cases in the discovery cohort harbored patient-matched primary breast cancer tissue and resected BrM. Given the rarity of patient-matched samples, no exclusion criteria were enacted. Two validation sequencing cohorts were used-a published data set of 17 patient-matched cases of BrM and a cohort of 7884 BrCa tumors enriched for metastatic samples. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Brain metastases expression changes in 127 genes within BrCa signatures, PAM50 assignments, and ERBB2/HER2 DNA-level gains. RESULTS: Overall, 17 of 20 BrM retained the PAM50 subtype of the primary BrCa. Despite this concordance, 17 of 20 BrM harbored expression changes (<2-fold or >2-fold) in clinically actionable genes including gains of FGFR4 (n = 6 [30%]), FLT1 (n = 4 [20%]), AURKA (n = 2 [10%]) and loss of ESR1 expression (n = 9 [45%]). The most recurrent expression gain was ERBB2/HER2, which showed a greater than 2-fold expression increase in 7 of 20 BrM (35%). Three of these 7 cases were ERBB2/HER2-negative out of 13 ERBB2/HER2-negative in the primary BrCa cohort and became immunohistochemical positive (3+) in the paired BrM with metastasis-specific amplification of the ERBB2/HER2 locus. In an independent data set, 2 of 9 (22.2%) ERBB2/HER2-negative BrCa switched to ERBB2/HER2-positive with 1 BrM acquiring ERBB2/HER2 amplification and the other showing metastatic enrichment of the activating V777L ERBB2/HER2 mutation. An expanded cohort revealed that ERBB2/HER2 amplification and/or mutation frequency was unchanged between local disease and metastases across all sites; however, a significant enrichment was appreciated for BrM (13% local vs 24% BrM; P < .001). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Breast cancer BrM commonly acquire alterations in clinically actionable genes, with metastasis-acquired ERBB2/HER2 alterations in approximately 20% of ERBB2/HER2-negative cases. These observations have immediate clinical implications for patients with ERBB2/HER2-negative breast cancer and support comprehensive profiling of metastases to inform clinical care.
Authors: Aaron McKenna; Matthew Hanna; Eric Banks; Andrey Sivachenko; Kristian Cibulskis; Andrew Kernytsky; Kiran Garimella; David Altshuler; Stacey Gabriel; Mark Daly; Mark A DePristo Journal: Genome Res Date: 2010-07-19 Impact factor: 9.043
Authors: Ann H Partridge; R Bryan Rumble; Lisa A Carey; Steven E Come; Nancy E Davidson; Angelo Di Leo; Julie Gralow; Gabriel N Hortobagyi; Beverly Moy; Douglas Yee; Shelley B Brundage; Michael A Danso; Maggie Wilcox; Ian E Smith Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2014-09-02 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Simon A Joosse; Juliane Hannemann; Julia Spötter; Andreas Bauche; Antje Andreas; Volkmar Müller; Klaus Pantel Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2012-01-06 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Ron Bose; Shyam M Kavuri; Adam C Searleman; Wei Shen; Dong Shen; Daniel C Koboldt; John Monsey; Nicholas Goel; Adam B Aronson; Shunqiang Li; Cynthia X Ma; Li Ding; Elaine R Mardis; Matthew J Ellis Journal: Cancer Discov Date: 2012-12-07 Impact factor: 39.397
Authors: Priscilla K Brastianos; Scott L Carter; Gad Getz; William C Hahn; Sandro Santagata; Daniel P Cahill; Amaro Taylor-Weiner; Robert T Jones; Eliezer M Van Allen; Michael S Lawrence; Peleg M Horowitz; Kristian Cibulskis; Keith L Ligon; Josep Tabernero; Joan Seoane; Elena Martinez-Saez; William T Curry; Ian F Dunn; Sun Ha Paek; Sung-Hye Park; Aaron McKenna; Aaron Chevalier; Mara Rosenberg; Frederick G Barker; Corey M Gill; Paul Van Hummelen; Aaron R Thorner; Bruce E Johnson; Mai P Hoang; Toni K Choueiri; Sabina Signoretti; Carrie Sougnez; Michael S Rabin; Nancy U Lin; Eric P Winer; Anat Stemmer-Rachamimov; Matthew Meyerson; Levi Garraway; Stacey Gabriel; Eric S Lander; Rameen Beroukhim; Tracy T Batchelor; Jose Baselga; David N Louis Journal: Cancer Discov Date: 2015-09-26 Impact factor: 39.397
Authors: Gro Nilsen; Knut Liestøl; Peter Van Loo; Hans Kristian Moen Vollan; Marianne B Eide; Oscar M Rueda; Suet-Feung Chin; Roslin Russell; Lars O Baumbusch; Carlos Caldas; Anne-Lise Børresen-Dale; Ole Christian Lingjaerde Journal: BMC Genomics Date: 2012-11-04 Impact factor: 3.969
Authors: Alex H Wagner; Adam C Coffman; Benjamin J Ainscough; Nicholas C Spies; Zachary L Skidmore; Katie M Campbell; Kilannin Krysiak; Deng Pan; Joshua F McMichael; James M Eldred; Jason R Walker; Richard K Wilson; Elaine R Mardis; Malachi Griffith; Obi L Griffith Journal: Nucleic Acids Res Date: 2015-11-03 Impact factor: 16.971
Authors: Ahmed Basudan; Nolan Priedigkeit; Ryan J Hartmaier; Ethan S Sokol; Amir Bahreini; Rebecca J Watters; Michelle M Boisen; Rohit Bhargava; Kurt R Weiss; Maria M Karsten; Carsten Denkert; Jens-Uwe Blohmer; Jose P Leone; Ronald L Hamilton; Adam M Brufsky; Esther Elishaev; Peter C Lucas; Adrian V Lee; Steffi Oesterreich Journal: Mol Cancer Res Date: 2018-10-24 Impact factor: 5.852
Authors: Gary A Ulaner; Serge K Lyashchenko; Christopher Riedl; Shutian Ruan; Pat B Zanzonico; Diana Lake; Komal Jhaveri; Brian Zeglis; Jason S Lewis; Joseph A O'Donoghue Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2017-11-16 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: Nolan Priedigkeit; Rebecca J Watters; Peter C Lucas; Ahmed Basudan; Rohit Bhargava; William Horne; Jay K Kolls; Zhou Fang; Margaret Q Rosenzweig; Adam M Brufsky; Kurt R Weiss; Steffi Oesterreich; Adrian V Lee Journal: JCI Insight Date: 2017-09-07
Authors: Susana Garcia-Recio; Aatish Thennavan; Michael P East; Joel S Parker; Juan M Cejalvo; Joseph P Garay; Daniel P Hollern; Xiaping He; Kevin R Mott; Patricia Galván; Cheng Fan; Sara R Selitsky; Alisha R Coffey; David Marron; Fara Brasó-Maristany; Octavio Burgués; Joan Albanell; Federico Rojo; Ana Lluch; Eduardo Martinez de Dueñas; Jeffery M Rosen; Gary L Johnson; Lisa A Carey; Aleix Prat; Charles M Perou Journal: J Clin Invest Date: 2020-09-01 Impact factor: 14.808