Literature DB >> 29066625

Local energetic frustration affects the dependence of green fluorescent protein folding on the chaperonin GroEL.

Boudhayan Bandyopadhyay1, Adi Goldenzweig2, Tamar Unger3, Orit Adato4, Sarel J Fleishman2, Ron Unger5, Amnon Horovitz6.   

Abstract

The GroE chaperonin system in Escherichia coli comprises GroEL and GroES and facilitates ATP-dependent protein folding in vivo and in vitro Proteins with very similar sequences and structures can differ in their dependence on GroEL for efficient folding. One potential but unverified source for GroEL dependence is frustration, wherein not all interactions in the native state are optimized energetically, thereby potentiating slow folding and misfolding. Here, we chose enhanced green fluorescent protein as a model system and subjected it to random mutagenesis, followed by screening for variants whose in vivo folding displays increased or decreased GroEL dependence. We confirmed the altered GroEL dependence of these variants with in vitro folding assays. Strikingly, mutations at positions predicted to be highly frustrated were found to correlate with decreased GroEL dependence. Conversely, mutations at positions with low frustration were found to correlate with increased GroEL dependence. Further support for this finding was obtained by showing that folding of an enhanced green fluorescent protein variant designed computationally to have reduced frustration is indeed less GroEL-dependent. Our results indicate that changes in local frustration also affect partitioning in vivo between spontaneous and chaperonin-mediated folding. Hence, the design of minimally frustrated sequences can reduce chaperonin dependence and improve protein expression levels.
© 2017 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  GroEL; chaperone; chaperonin; kinetics; protein design; protein folding

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29066625      PMCID: PMC5733594          DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M117.808576

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biol Chem        ISSN: 0021-9258            Impact factor:   5.157


  31 in total

1.  GroEL binds artificial proteins with random sequences.

Authors:  K Aoki; F Motojima; H Taguchi; T Yomo; M Yoshida
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2000-05-05       Impact factor: 5.157

Review 2.  Chaperonin-mediated protein folding.

Authors:  D Thirumalai; G H Lorimer
Journal:  Annu Rev Biophys Biomol Struct       Date:  2001

Review 3.  The GroEL-GroES Chaperonin Machine: A Nano-Cage for Protein Folding.

Authors:  Manajit Hayer-Hartl; Andreas Bracher; F Ulrich Hartl
Journal:  Trends Biochem Sci       Date:  2015-09-25       Impact factor: 13.807

Review 4.  Allosteric Mechanisms in Chaperonin Machines.

Authors:  Ranit Gruber; Amnon Horovitz
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2016-01-04       Impact factor: 60.622

5.  GroE is vital for cell-wall synthesis.

Authors:  N McLennan; M Masters
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1998-03-12       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  Protein Frustratometer 2: a tool to localize energetic frustration in protein molecules, now with electrostatics.

Authors:  R Gonzalo Parra; Nicholas P Schafer; Leandro G Radusky; Min-Yeh Tsai; A Brenda Guzovsky; Peter G Wolynes; Diego U Ferreiro
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2016-04-29       Impact factor: 16.971

7.  Identifying natural substrates for chaperonins using a sequence-based approach.

Authors:  George Stan; Bernard R Brooks; George H Lorimer; D Thirumalai
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2004-12-02       Impact factor: 6.725

8.  Proline replacements and the simplification of the complex, parallel channel folding mechanism for the alpha subunit of Trp synthase, a TIM barrel protein.

Authors:  Ying Wu; C Robert Matthews
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2003-07-25       Impact factor: 5.469

9.  Low folding propensity and high translation efficiency distinguish in vivo substrates of GroEL from other Escherichia coli proteins.

Authors:  Orly Noivirt-Brik; Ron Unger; Amnon Horovitz
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2007-11-15       Impact factor: 6.937

10.  A molecular mechanism of chaperone-client recognition.

Authors:  Lichun He; Timothy Sharpe; Adam Mazur; Sebastian Hiller
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2016-11-16       Impact factor: 14.136

View more
  7 in total

1.  Protein tolerance to random circular permutation correlates with thermostability and local energetics of residue-residue contacts.

Authors:  Joshua T Atkinson; Alicia M Jones; Vikas Nanda; Jonathan J Silberg
Journal:  Protein Eng Des Sel       Date:  2019-12-31       Impact factor: 1.650

2.  Contact Order Is a Determinant for the Dependence of GFP Folding on the Chaperonin GroEL.

Authors:  Boudhayan Bandyopadhyay; Tridib Mondal; Ron Unger; Amnon Horovitz
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2018-11-22       Impact factor: 4.033

Review 3.  Successes and challenges in simulating the folding of large proteins.

Authors:  Anne Gershenson; Shachi Gosavi; Pietro Faccioli; Patrick L Wintrode
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2019-11-11       Impact factor: 5.157

4.  Comparative genomic analysis of mollicutes with and without a chaperonin system.

Authors:  Dominik Schwarz; Orit Adato; Amnon Horovitz; Ron Unger
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-02-13       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Differential proteostatic regulation of insoluble and abundant proteins.

Authors:  Reshmi Ramakrishnan; Bert Houben; Frederic Rousseau; Joost Schymkowitz
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2019-10-15       Impact factor: 6.937

6.  Systematic In Vivo Characterization of Fluorescent Protein Maturation in Budding Yeast.

Authors:  Paolo Guerra; Luc-Alban Vuillemenot; Brady Rae; Valeriia Ladyhina; Andreas Milias-Argeitis
Journal:  ACS Synth Biol       Date:  2022-02-18       Impact factor: 5.110

7.  Influence of Fluorescent Protein Maturation on FRET Measurements in Living Cells.

Authors:  Boqun Liu; Sara N Mavrova; Jonas van den Berg; Sebastian K Kristensen; Luca Mantovanelli; Liesbeth M Veenhoff; Bert Poolman; Arnold J Boersma
Journal:  ACS Sens       Date:  2018-09-12       Impact factor: 7.711

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.