Literature DB >> 18006553

Low folding propensity and high translation efficiency distinguish in vivo substrates of GroEL from other Escherichia coli proteins.

Orly Noivirt-Brik1, Ron Unger, Amnon Horovitz.   

Abstract

MOTIVATION: Theoretical considerations have indicated that the amount of chaperonin GroEL in Escherichia coli cells is sufficient to fold only approximately 2-5% of newly synthesized proteins under normal physiological conditions, thereby suggesting that only a subset of E.coli proteins fold in vivo in a GroEL-dependent manner. Recently, members of this subset were identified in two independent studies that resulted in two partially overlapping lists of GroEL-interacting proteins. The objective of the work described here was to identify sequence-based features of GroEL-interacting proteins that distinguish them from other E.coli proteins and that may account for their dependence on the chaperonin system.
RESULTS: Our analysis shows that GroEL-interacting proteins have, on average, low folding propensities and high translation efficiencies. These two properties in combination can increase the risk of aggregation of these proteins and, thus, cause their folding to be chaperonin-dependent. Strikingly, we find that these properties are absent in proteins homologous to the E.coli GroEL-interacting proteins in Ureaplasma urealyticum, an organism that lacks a chaperonin system, thereby confirming our conclusions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18006553     DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btm513

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bioinformatics        ISSN: 1367-4803            Impact factor:   6.937


  9 in total

1.  A systematic survey of in vivo obligate chaperonin-dependent substrates.

Authors:  Kei Fujiwara; Yasushi Ishihama; Kenji Nakahigashi; Tomoyoshi Soga; Hideki Taguchi
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2010-04-01       Impact factor: 11.598

2.  Chaperonin overexpression promotes genetic variation and enzyme evolution.

Authors:  Nobuhiko Tokuriki; Dan S Tawfik
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2009-06-04       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Chaperones GroEL/GroES accelerate the refolding of a multidomain protein through modulating on-pathway intermediates.

Authors:  Vinay Dahiya; Tapan K Chaudhuri
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2013-11-18       Impact factor: 5.157

4.  Local energetic frustration affects the dependence of green fluorescent protein folding on the chaperonin GroEL.

Authors:  Boudhayan Bandyopadhyay; Adi Goldenzweig; Tamar Unger; Orit Adato; Sarel J Fleishman; Ron Unger; Amnon Horovitz
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2017-10-24       Impact factor: 5.157

Review 5.  Iterative annealing mechanism explains the functions of the GroEL and RNA chaperones.

Authors:  D Thirumalai; George H Lorimer; Changbong Hyeon
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2019-12-23       Impact factor: 6.725

6.  Decoding Structural Properties of a Partially Unfolded Protein Substrate: En Route to Chaperone Binding.

Authors:  Suhani Nagpal; Satyam Tiwari; Koyeli Mapa; Lipi Thukral
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2015-09-22       Impact factor: 4.475

7.  How do eubacterial organisms manage aggregation-prone proteome?

Authors:  Rishi Das Roy; Manju Bhardwaj; Vasudha Bhatnagar; Kausik Chakraborty; Debasis Dash
Journal:  F1000Res       Date:  2014-06-27

8.  Comparative genomic analysis of mollicutes with and without a chaperonin system.

Authors:  Dominik Schwarz; Orit Adato; Amnon Horovitz; Ron Unger
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-02-13       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  GroEL dependency affects codon usage--support for a critical role of misfolding in gene evolution.

Authors:  Tobias Warnecke; Laurence D Hurst
Journal:  Mol Syst Biol       Date:  2010-01-19       Impact factor: 11.429

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.