Literature DB >> 29064748

The Future of Contrast-Enhanced Mammography.

Matthew F Covington1,2, Victor J Pizzitola1, Roxanne Lorans1, Barbara A Pockaj3, Donald W Northfelt4, Catherine M Appleton2, Bhavika K Patel1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this article is to discuss facilitators of and barriers to future implementation of contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM) in the United States.
CONCLUSION: CEM provides low-energy 2D mammographic images analogous to digital mammography and contrast-enhanced recombined images that allow assessment of neovascularity similar to that offered by MRI. The utilization of CEM in the United States is currently low but could increase rapidly given the many potential indications for its clinical use.

Keywords:  contrast-enhanced digital mammography; contrast-enhanced mammography; contrast-enhanced spectral mammography

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29064748     DOI: 10.2214/AJR.17.18749

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol        ISSN: 0361-803X            Impact factor:   3.959


  9 in total

1.  Combined Benefit of Quantitative Three-Compartment Breast Image Analysis and Mammography Radiomics in the Classification of Breast Masses in a Clinical Data Set.

Authors:  Karen Drukker; Maryellen L Giger; Bonnie N Joe; Karla Kerlikowske; Heather Greenwood; Jennifer S Drukteinis; Bethany Niell; Bo Fan; Serghei Malkov; Jesus Avila; Leila Kazemi; John Shepherd
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2018-12-11       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 2.  Screening for breast cancer in 2018-what should we be doing today?

Authors:  J M Seely; T Alhassan
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2018-06-13       Impact factor: 3.677

3.  Diagnostic performance of contrast-enhanced dual-energy spectral mammography (CESM): a retrospective study involving 644 breast lesions.

Authors:  María Del Mar Travieso-Aja; Daniel Maldonado-Saluzzi; Pedro Naranjo-Santana; Claudia Fernández-Ruiz; Wilsa Severino-Rondón; Mario Rodríguez Rodríguez; Víctor Vega Benítez; Octavio Pérez-Luzardo
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2019-06-27       Impact factor: 3.469

Review 4.  Contrast-enhanced mammography: past, present, and future.

Authors:  Julie Sogani; Victoria L Mango; Delia Keating; Janice S Sung; Maxine S Jochelson
Journal:  Clin Imaging       Date:  2020-09-19       Impact factor: 1.605

5.  Utility of Targeted Ultrasound to Predict Malignancy Among Lesions Detected on Contrast-Enhanced Digital Mammography.

Authors:  Kristen Coffey; Janice Sung; Christopher Comstock; Gulce Askin; Maxine S Jochelson; Elizabeth A Morris; Donna D'Alessio
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2020-10-07       Impact factor: 6.582

6.  A multicenter study of a contrast-enhanced ultrasound diagnostic classification of breast lesions.

Authors:  Lina Tang; Yijie Chen; Zhongshi Du; Zhaoming Zhong; Qin Chen; Lichun Yang; Ruoxia Shen; Yan Cheng; Zizhen Zhang; Ehui Han; Zhihong Lv; Lijun Yuan; Yong Yang; Yinrong Cheng; Lei Yang; Shengli Wang; Baoyan Bai; Jun Luo
Journal:  Cancer Manag Res       Date:  2019-03-15       Impact factor: 3.989

7.  Contrast-Enhanced Spectral Mammography: Importance of the Assessment of Breast Tumor Size.

Authors:  Luca Nicosia; Anna Carla Bozzini; Antuono Latronico; Enrico Cassano
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2020-09-10       Impact factor: 3.500

8.  Diagnostic accuracy of contrast-enhanced spectral mammography for breast lesions: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Matteo Basilio Suter; Filippo Pesapane; Giorgio Maria Agazzi; Tania Gagliardi; Olga Nigro; Anna Bozzini; Francesca Priolo; Silvia Penco; Enrico Cassano; Claudio Chini; Alessandro Squizzato
Journal:  Breast       Date:  2020-06-10       Impact factor: 4.380

Review 9.  A review on methods for diagnosis of breast cancer cells and tissues.

Authors:  Ziyu He; Zhu Chen; Miduo Tan; Sauli Elingarami; Yuan Liu; Taotao Li; Yan Deng; Nongyue He; Song Li; Juan Fu; Wen Li
Journal:  Cell Prolif       Date:  2020-06-12       Impact factor: 6.831

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.