Literature DB >> 32932566

Contrast-Enhanced Spectral Mammography: Importance of the Assessment of Breast Tumor Size.

Luca Nicosia1, Anna Carla Bozzini2, Antuono Latronico2, Enrico Cassano2.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh：

Year:  2020        PMID： 32932566      PMCID： PMC7909849          DOI： 10.3348/kjr.2020.0611

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Korean J Radiol        ISSN： 1229-6929            Impact factor:   3.500


× No keyword cloud information.
  14 in total

1.  Dual-energy contrast-enhanced digital mammography: initial clinical results.

Authors:  Clarisse Dromain; Fabienne Thibault; Serge Muller; Françoise Rimareix; Suzette Delaloge; Anne Tardivon; Corinne Balleyguier
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2010-09-14       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Contrast-Enhanced Mammography and Radiomics Analysis for Noninvasive Breast Cancer Characterization: Initial Results.

Authors:  Maria Adele Marino; Katja Pinker; Doris Leithner; Janice Sung; Daly Avendano; Elizabeth A Morris; Maxine Jochelson
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2020-06       Impact factor: 3.488

3.  Use of contrast-enhanced spectral mammography for intramammary cancer staging: preliminary results.

Authors:  Katrin S Blum; Christian Rubbert; Britta Mathys; Gerald Antoch; Svjetlana Mohrmann; Silvia Obenauer
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2014-08-12       Impact factor: 3.173

4.  Assessing tumor extent on contrast-enhanced spectral mammography versus full-field digital mammography and ultrasound.

Authors:  Bhavika K Patel; Sandra Alheli Garza; Sarah Eversman; Yania Lopez-Alvarez; Heidi Kosiorek; Barbara A Pockaj
Journal:  Clin Imaging       Date:  2017-07-12       Impact factor: 1.605

5.  Accuracy of radiological tumour size assessment and the risk for re-excision in a cohort of primary breast cancer patients.

Authors:  M Meier-Meitinger; C Rauh; B Adamietz; P A Fasching; S A Schwab; L Haeberle; A Hein; C M Bayer; M R Bani; M P Lux; A Hartmann; D L Wachter; M Uder; R Schulz-Wendtland; M W Beckmann; K Heusinger
Journal:  Eur J Surg Oncol       Date:  2011-10-26       Impact factor: 4.424

Review 6.  Contrast Enhanced Spectral Mammography: A Review.

Authors:  Bhavika K Patel; M B I Lobbes; John Lewin
Journal:  Semin Ultrasound CT MR       Date:  2017-08-24       Impact factor: 1.875

Review 7.  The Future of Contrast-Enhanced Mammography.

Authors:  Matthew F Covington; Victor J Pizzitola; Roxanne Lorans; Barbara A Pockaj; Donald W Northfelt; Catherine M Appleton; Bhavika K Patel
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2017-10-24       Impact factor: 3.959

8.  Clinical utility of dual-energy contrast-enhanced spectral mammography for breast microcalcifications without associated mass: a preliminary analysis.

Authors:  Yun-Chung Cheung; Hsiu-Pei Tsai; Yung-Feng Lo; Shir-Hwa Ueng; Pei-Chin Huang; Shin-Chih Chen
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2015-07-10       Impact factor: 5.315

9.  Contrast-enhanced spectral mammography: comparison with conventional mammography and histopathology in 152 women.

Authors:  Elzbieta Luczyńska; Sylwia Heinze-Paluchowska; Sonia Dyczek; Pawel Blecharz; Janusz Rys; Marian Reinfuss
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2014-11-07       Impact factor: 3.500

10.  The quality of tumor size assessment by contrast-enhanced spectral mammography and the benefit of additional breast MRI.

Authors:  Marc B I Lobbes; Ulrich C Lalji; Patty J Nelemans; Ivo Houben; Marjolein L Smidt; Esther Heuts; Bart de Vries; Joachim E Wildberger; Regina G Beets-Tan
Journal:  J Cancer       Date:  2015-01-05       Impact factor: 4.207
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.