Literature DB >> 33025811

Utility of Targeted Ultrasound to Predict Malignancy Among Lesions Detected on Contrast-Enhanced Digital Mammography.

Kristen Coffey1, Janice Sung1, Christopher Comstock1, Gulce Askin1, Maxine S Jochelson1, Elizabeth A Morris1, Donna D'Alessio1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND. Targeted ultrasound (US) can be performed to characterize and potentially biopsy areas of enhancement detected on contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM). OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to assess the utility of targeted US in predicting malignancy of lesions with indeterminate or suspicious enhancement on CEM. METHODS. One thousand consecutive CEM examinations with same-day targeted breast US at one institution between October 2013 and May 2018 were retrospectively reviewed. All patients with indeterminate or suspicious enhancement detected on CEM that underwent US evaluation were included. Patients with palpable or symptomatic lesions, those with suspicious findings on low-energy mammograms or images obtained with another modality, and those with less than 1 year of follow-up were excluded. Medical records, imaging, and pathology data were reviewed. Histopathologic analysis was used as the reference standard for biopsied lesions, and follow-up imaging was used for unbiopsied lesions. Associations between pathologic diagnosis, presence of a US correlate, and lesion characteristics were assessed by Fisher exact, chi-square, and Wilcox-on rank sum tests. RESULTS. Among 153 enhancing lesions detected on CEM in 144 patients, 47 (31%) had a US correlate. The frequency of a correlate between CEM and US was significantly higher among enhancing masses (28/43 [65%]) than among lesions exhibiting nonmass enhancement (19/110 [17%]) (p < .001). The likelihood of malignancy was significantly greater among lesions with a US correlate (12/47 [26%]) than among those without a US correlate (11/106 [10%]) (p = .03), and among mass lesions (11/43 [26%]) than among nonmass lesions (12/110 [11%]) (p = .04). The PPV of US-guided biopsy after CEM-directed US was 32%. CONCLUSION. Enhancing CEM-detected lesions that have a US correlate are more likely to be malignant and can be evaluated with US-guided biopsy to obviate additional breast MRI. CLINICAL IMPACT. CEM-directed US of enhancing lesions is useful given that lesions with a US correlate are more likely to be malignant and can be used as targets for US-guided biopsy until a CEM biopsy system becomes commercially available.

Entities:  

Keywords:  breast neoplasms; contrast media; mammography; ultrasound

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33025811      PMCID: PMC9295859          DOI: 10.2214/AJR.20.24368

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol        ISSN: 0361-803X            Impact factor:   6.582


  27 in total

1.  Dual-energy contrast-enhanced digital mammography: initial clinical results.

Authors:  Clarisse Dromain; Fabienne Thibault; Serge Muller; Françoise Rimareix; Suzette Delaloge; Anne Tardivon; Corinne Balleyguier
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2010-09-14       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Utility of targeted sonography for breast lesions that were suspicious on MRI.

Authors:  Wendy B Demartini; Peter R Eby; Sue Peacock; Constance D Lehman
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 3.959

Review 3.  The Future of Contrast-Enhanced Mammography.

Authors:  Matthew F Covington; Victor J Pizzitola; Roxanne Lorans; Barbara A Pockaj; Donald W Northfelt; Catherine M Appleton; Bhavika K Patel
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2017-10-24       Impact factor: 3.959

Review 4.  MR imaging of the breast for the detection, diagnosis, and staging of breast cancer.

Authors:  S G Orel; M D Schnall
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 11.105

5.  MR-directed ("Second-Look") ultrasound examination for breast lesions detected initially on MRI: MR and sonographic findings.

Authors:  Hiroyuki Abe; Robert A Schmidt; Rajshri N Shah; Akiko Shimauchi; Kirti Kulkarni; Charlene A Sennett; Gillian M Newstead
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 3.959

6.  Indeterminate or suspicious breast lesions detected initially with MR imaging: value of MRI-directed breast ultrasound.

Authors:  Cholatip Wiratkapun; Deirdre Duke; Amy S Nordmann; Panuwat Lertsithichai; Vamsidhar Narra; Premsri T Barton; Charles F Hildebolt; Kyongtae T Bae
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 3.173

7.  Contrast Enhanced Digital Mammography (CEDM) Helps to Safely Reduce Benign Breast Biopsies for Low to Moderately Suspicious Soft Tissue Lesions.

Authors:  Margarita L Zuley; Andriy I Bandos; Gordon S Abrams; Marie A Ganott; Terri-Ann Gizienski; Christiane M Hakim; Amy E Kelly; Bronwyn E Nair; Jules H Sumkin; Uzma Waheed; David Gur
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2019-09-05       Impact factor: 3.173

8.  Contrast-Enhanced Spectral Mammography in Women With Intermediate Breast Cancer Risk and Dense Breasts.

Authors:  Vera Sorin; Yael Yagil; Ady Yosepovich; Anat Shalmon; Michael Gotlieb; Osnat Halshtok Neiman; Miri Sklair-Levy
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2018-09-21       Impact factor: 3.959

9.  Second-look ultrasonography for MRI-detected suspicious breast lesions in patients with breast cancer.

Authors:  Min Ji Hong; Joo Hee Cha; Hak Hee Kim; Hee Jung Shin; Eun Young Chae; Ji Eun Shin; Woo Jung Choi
Journal:  Ultrasonography       Date:  2014-12-18

10.  Diagnostic accuracy of contrast-enhanced spectral mammography for breast lesions: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Matteo Basilio Suter; Filippo Pesapane; Giorgio Maria Agazzi; Tania Gagliardi; Olga Nigro; Anna Bozzini; Francesca Priolo; Silvia Penco; Enrico Cassano; Claudio Chini; Alessandro Squizzato
Journal:  Breast       Date:  2020-06-10       Impact factor: 4.380

View more
  1 in total

1.  Comparison of False-Positive Versus True-Positive Findings on Contrast-Enhanced Digital Mammography.

Authors:  Tali Amir; Molly P Hogan; Stefanie Jacobs; Varadan Sevilimedu; Janice Sung; Maxine S Jochelson
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2021-11-24       Impact factor: 3.959

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.