Literature DB >> 29063199

Urbanization-mediated context dependence in the effect of floral neighborhood on pollinator visitation.

Gordon M Fitch1.   

Abstract

Context dependence in ecological interactions is widespread, but our ability to predict how environmental variation will mediate the effects of a given interaction remains poor. Co-flowering plants can influence visitation of shared pollinators to one another; the effect of these interactions varies with ecological context. While research has investigated the effect of local biotic conditions on such interactions, little is known about how land use change, specifically urbanization, affects them. I tested how the interaction of urbanization and neighborhood floral density (NFD) and richness affected pollinator visitation rates to two crop species, cucumber and sunflower by placing experimental arrays of each species in paired high- (garden) and low- (lawn) floral density neighborhoods along an urban-to-rural gradient. Pollinator visitation to flowers was monitored over 2 years, as was NFD and richness. The two plant species showed contrasting responses to both urbanization and floral neighborhood density, with only cucumber experiencing context dependence in the effect of floral neighborhood. These contrasting responses to urbanization and floral neighborhood are likely due to differences between species in floral visitor community composition. Plants grown in gardens experienced higher pollinator visitation regardless of floral neighborhood. This study highlights the need for better understanding of genus- or species-specific pollinator responses to urbanization to predict the effect of urbanization on plant-pollinator interactions.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Contingency; Facilitation; Floral neighborhood effects; Pollinator-mediated plant interactions; Urban ecology

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29063199     DOI: 10.1007/s00442-017-3982-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oecologia        ISSN: 0029-8549            Impact factor:   3.225


  25 in total

1.  Generalization versus specialization in plant pollination systems.

Authors: 
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 17.712

2.  Positive interactions among alpine plants increase with stress.

Authors:  Ragan M Callaway; R W Brooker; Philippe Choler; Zaal Kikvidze; Christopher J Lortie; Richard Michalet; Leonardo Paolini; Francisco I Pugnaire; Beth Newingham; Erik T Aschehoug; Cristina Armas; David Kikodze; Bradley J Cook
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2002-06-20       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Pollination decays in biodiversity hotspots.

Authors:  Jana C Vamosi; Tiffany M Knight; Janette A Steets; Susan J Mazer; Martin Burd; Tia-Lynn Ashman
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-01-17       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Pollination by ants: consequences of the quantitative effects on a mutualistic system.

Authors:  J M Gómez; R Zamora
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  Global forecasts of urban expansion to 2030 and direct impacts on biodiversity and carbon pools.

Authors:  Karen C Seto; Burak Güneralp; Lucy R Hutyra
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-09-17       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Evaluating the effects of pollinator-mediated interactions using pollen transfer networks: evidence of widespread facilitation in south Andean plant communities.

Authors:  C Tur; A Sáez; A Traveset; M A Aizen
Journal:  Ecol Lett       Date:  2016-03-14       Impact factor: 9.492

7.  Modeling the status, trends, and impacts of wild bee abundance in the United States.

Authors:  Insu Koh; Eric V Lonsdorf; Neal M Williams; Claire Brittain; Rufus Isaacs; Jason Gibbs; Taylor H Ricketts
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-12-22       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 8.  Species interactions among larval mosquitoes: context dependence across habitat gradients.

Authors:  Steven A Juliano
Journal:  Annu Rev Entomol       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 19.686

9.  Antagonistic interactions between plant competition and insect herbivory.

Authors:  Martin Schädler; Roland Brandl; Josephine Haase
Journal:  Ecology       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 5.499

10.  Delivery of crop pollination services is an insufficient argument for wild pollinator conservation.

Authors:  David Kleijn; Rachael Winfree; Ignasi Bartomeus; Luísa G Carvalheiro; Mickaël Henry; Rufus Isaacs; Alexandra-Maria Klein; Claire Kremen; Leithen K M'Gonigle; Romina Rader; Taylor H Ricketts; Neal M Williams; Nancy Lee Adamson; John S Ascher; András Báldi; Péter Batáry; Faye Benjamin; Jacobus C Biesmeijer; Eleanor J Blitzer; Riccardo Bommarco; Mariëtte R Brand; Vincent Bretagnolle; Lindsey Button; Daniel P Cariveau; Rémy Chifflet; Jonathan F Colville; Bryan N Danforth; Elizabeth Elle; Michael P D Garratt; Felix Herzog; Andrea Holzschuh; Brad G Howlett; Frank Jauker; Shalene Jha; Eva Knop; Kristin M Krewenka; Violette Le Féon; Yael Mandelik; Emily A May; Mia G Park; Gideon Pisanty; Menno Reemer; Verena Riedinger; Orianne Rollin; Maj Rundlöf; Hillary S Sardiñas; Jeroen Scheper; Amber R Sciligo; Henrik G Smith; Ingolf Steffan-Dewenter; Robbin Thorp; Teja Tscharntke; Jort Verhulst; Blandina F Viana; Bernard E Vaissière; Ruan Veldtman; Kimiora L Ward; Catrin Westphal; Simon G Potts
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2015-06-16       Impact factor: 14.919

View more
  2 in total

1.  Does urbanization favour exotic bee species? Implications for the conservation of native bees in cities.

Authors:  Gordon Fitch; Caleb J Wilson; Paul Glaum; Chatura Vaidya; Maria-Carolina Simao; Mary A Jamieson
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2019-12-11       Impact factor: 3.703

2.  Changes in adult sex ratio in wild bee communities are linked to urbanization.

Authors:  Gordon Fitch; Paul Glaum; Maria-Carolina Simao; Chatura Vaidya; Jill Matthijs; Benjamin Iuliano; Ivette Perfecto
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-03-06       Impact factor: 4.379

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.