Literature DB >> 26699460

Modeling the status, trends, and impacts of wild bee abundance in the United States.

Insu Koh1, Eric V Lonsdorf2, Neal M Williams3, Claire Brittain3, Rufus Isaacs4, Jason Gibbs4, Taylor H Ricketts5.   

Abstract

Wild bees are highly valuable pollinators. Along with managed honey bees, they provide a critical ecosystem service by ensuring stable pollination to agriculture and wild plant communities. Increasing concern about the welfare of both wild and managed pollinators, however, has prompted recent calls for national evaluation and action. Here, for the first time to our knowledge, we assess the status and trends of wild bees and their potential impacts on pollination services across the coterminous United States. We use a spatial habitat model, national land-cover data, and carefully quantified expert knowledge to estimate wild bee abundance and associated uncertainty. Between 2008 and 2013, modeled bee abundance declined across 23% of US land area. This decline was generally associated with conversion of natural habitats to row crops. We identify 139 counties where low bee abundances correspond to large areas of pollinator-dependent crops. These areas of mismatch between supply (wild bee abundance) and demand (cultivated area) for pollination comprise 39% of the pollinator-dependent crop area in the United States. Further, we find that the crops most highly dependent on pollinators tend to experience more severe mismatches between declining supply and increasing demand. These trends, should they continue, may increase costs for US farmers and may even destabilize crop production over time. National assessments such as this can help focus both scientific and political efforts to understand and sustain wild bees. As new information becomes available, repeated assessments can update findings, revise priorities, and track progress toward sustainable management of our nation's pollinators.

Entities:  

Keywords:  crop pollination; ecosystem services; habitat suitability; land-use change; uncertainty

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26699460      PMCID: PMC4711882          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1517685113

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  33 in total

Review 1.  The role of resources and risks in regulating wild bee populations.

Authors:  T'ai H Roulston; Karen Goodell
Journal:  Annu Rev Entomol       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 19.686

2.  Bee foraging ranges and their relationship to body size.

Authors:  Sarah S Greenleaf; Neal M Williams; Rachael Winfree; Claire Kremen
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2007-05-05       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Reply to Kline et al.: Cropland data layer provides a valid assessment of recent grassland conversion in the Western Corn Belt.

Authors:  Christopher K Wright; Michael C Wimberly
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-07-30       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Recent land use change in the Western Corn Belt threatens grasslands and wetlands.

Authors:  Christopher K Wright; Michael C Wimberly
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-02-19       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Detecting insect pollinator declines on regional and global scales.

Authors:  Gretchen Lebuhn; Sam Droege; Edward F Connor; Barbara Gemmill-Herren; Simon G Potts; Robert L Minckley; Terry Griswold; Robert Jean; Emanuel Kula; David W Roubik; Jim Cane; Karen W Wright; Gordon Frankie; Frank Parker
Journal:  Conserv Biol       Date:  2012-12-12       Impact factor: 6.560

6.  Historical changes in northeastern US bee pollinators related to shared ecological traits.

Authors:  Ignasi Bartomeus; John S Ascher; Jason Gibbs; Bryan N Danforth; David L Wagner; Shannon M Hedtke; Rachael Winfree
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-03-04       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Complex responses within a desert bee guild (Hymenoptera: Apiformes) to urban habitat fragmentation.

Authors:  James H Cane; Robert L Minckley; Linda J Kervin; T'ai H Roulston; Neal M Williams
Journal:  Ecol Appl       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 4.657

8.  Wild pollinators enhance fruit set of crops regardless of honey bee abundance.

Authors:  Lucas A Garibaldi; Ingolf Steffan-Dewenter; Rachael Winfree; Marcelo A Aizen; Riccardo Bommarco; Saul A Cunningham; Claire Kremen; Luísa G Carvalheiro; Lawrence D Harder; Ohad Afik; Ignasi Bartomeus; Faye Benjamin; Virginie Boreux; Daniel Cariveau; Natacha P Chacoff; Jan H Dudenhöffer; Breno M Freitas; Jaboury Ghazoul; Sarah Greenleaf; Juliana Hipólito; Andrea Holzschuh; Brad Howlett; Rufus Isaacs; Steven K Javorek; Christina M Kennedy; Kristin M Krewenka; Smitha Krishnan; Yael Mandelik; Margaret M Mayfield; Iris Motzke; Theodore Munyuli; Brian A Nault; Mark Otieno; Jessica Petersen; Gideon Pisanty; Simon G Potts; Romina Rader; Taylor H Ricketts; Maj Rundlöf; Colleen L Seymour; Christof Schüepp; Hajnalka Szentgyörgyi; Hisatomo Taki; Teja Tscharntke; Carlos H Vergara; Blandina F Viana; Thomas C Wanger; Catrin Westphal; Neal Williams; Alexandra M Klein
Journal:  Science       Date:  2013-02-28       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  Hedgerow restoration promotes pollinator populations and exports native bees to adjacent fields.

Authors:  Lora A Morandin; Claire Kremen
Journal:  Ecol Appl       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 4.657

10.  Insect pollinated crops, insect pollinators and US agriculture: trend analysis of aggregate data for the period 1992-2009.

Authors:  Nicholas W Calderone
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-05-22       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  43 in total

Review 1.  Safeguarding pollinators and their values to human well-being.

Authors:  Simon G Potts; Vera Imperatriz-Fonseca; Hien T Ngo; Marcelo A Aizen; Jacobus C Biesmeijer; Thomas D Breeze; Lynn V Dicks; Lucas A Garibaldi; Rosemary Hill; Josef Settele; Adam J Vanbergen
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2016-11-28       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Urbanization-mediated context dependence in the effect of floral neighborhood on pollinator visitation.

Authors:  Gordon M Fitch
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2017-10-23       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Occurrence of Honey Bee (Apis mellifera L.) Pathogens in Wild Pollinators in Northern Italy.

Authors:  Giovanni Cilia; Simone Flaminio; Laura Zavatta; Rosa Ranalli; Marino Quaranta; Laura Bortolotti; Antonio Nanetti
Journal:  Front Cell Infect Microbiol       Date:  2022-06-30       Impact factor: 6.073

4.  Flower plantings promote insect pollinator abundance and wild bee richness in Canadian agricultural landscapes.

Authors:  Stephen G Van Drunen; Jessica E Linton; Gregory Kuwahara; D Ryan Norris
Journal:  J Insect Conserv       Date:  2022-04-28       Impact factor: 2.620

5.  Crop production in the USA is frequently limited by a lack of pollinators.

Authors:  J R Reilly; D R Artz; D Biddinger; K Bobiwash; N K Boyle; C Brittain; J Brokaw; J W Campbell; J Daniels; E Elle; J D Ellis; S J Fleischer; J Gibbs; R L Gillespie; K B Gundersen; L Gut; G Hoffman; N Joshi; O Lundin; K Mason; C M McGrady; S S Peterson; T L Pitts-Singer; S Rao; N Rothwell; L Rowe; K L Ward; N M Williams; J K Wilson; R Isaacs; R Winfree
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2020-07-29       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  A list of bees from three locations in the Northern Rockies Ecoregion (NRE) of western Montana.

Authors:  Elizabeth G Reese; Laura A Burkle; Casey M Delphia; Terry Griswold
Journal:  Biodivers Data J       Date:  2018-10-30

7.  Do Viruses From Managed Honey Bees (Hymenoptera: Apidae) Endanger Wild Bees in Native Prairies?

Authors:  Zoe A Pritchard; Harmen P Hendriksma; Ashley L St Clair; David S Stein; Adam G Dolezal; Matthew E O'Neal; Amy L Toth
Journal:  Environ Entomol       Date:  2021-04-23       Impact factor: 2.377

Review 8.  Bombus (Hymenoptera: Apidae) Microcolonies as a Tool for Biological Understanding and Pesticide Risk Assessment.

Authors:  Ellen G Klinger; Allison A Camp; James P Strange; Diana Cox-Foster; David M Lehmann
Journal:  Environ Entomol       Date:  2019-12-02       Impact factor: 2.387

9.  Projected losses of ecosystem services in the US disproportionately affect non-white and lower-income populations.

Authors:  Jesse D Gourevitch; Aura M Alonso-Rodríguez; Natalia Aristizábal; Luz A de Wit; Eva Kinnebrew; Caitlin E Littlefield; Maya Moore; Charles C Nicholson; Aaron J Schwartz; Taylor H Ricketts
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2021-06-10       Impact factor: 14.919

10.  Meta-analysis reveals that seed-applied neonicotinoids and pyrethroids have similar negative effects on abundance of arthropod natural enemies.

Authors:  Margaret R Douglas; John F Tooker
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2016-12-07       Impact factor: 2.984

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.