Literature DB >> 29062560

Use of a Minimally Invasive Cardiac Output Monitor to Optimise Haemodynamics in a Patient with Mitral Valve Disease Undergoing Cerebrovascular Surgery.

Ali M Al-Mashani1, Niranjan D Waje2, Neeraj Salhotra1, Samaresh Das3, Neelam Suri3, Rashid A Al-Sheheimi4, Nilay Chatterjee3.   

Abstract

Patients with mitral valve disease undergoing cerebrovascular surgery face increased inherent risks due to their associated cardiac comorbidities. As such, the anaesthetic management of such patients is distinctly challenging. Simultaneous consideration of both the cerebrovascular and underlying cardiac conditions determines key anaesthetic issues, as fluids and vasopressors or inotropes need to be titrated according to haemodynamic variables in order to optimise cerebral blood flow without compromising cardiac function. We report a 45-year-old female patient with mild mitral stenosis and moderate-to-severe mitral regurgitation who presented to the Khoula Hospital, Muscat, Oman, in 2016 following a ruptured anterior communicating artery aneurysm requiring urgent surgical intervention. As highlighted in this case, the VolumeView EV1000™ (Edwards Lifesciences, Irvine, California, USA) system is a minimially invasive haemodynamic monitor that can help immensely in the perioperative management of such patients.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Anesthesia; Cardiac Output; Case Report; Cerebral Aneurysm; Hemodynamics; Mitral Valve Regurgitation; Mitral Valve Stenosis; Oman

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29062560      PMCID: PMC5642367          DOI: 10.18295/squmj.2017.17.03.015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sultan Qaboos Univ Med J        ISSN: 2075-051X


  13 in total

1.  Changes in left ventricular preload, afterload, and cardiac output in response to a single dose of mannitol in neurosurgical patients undergoing craniotomy: a transesophageal echocardiographic study.

Authors:  Nilay Chatterjee; Thomas Koshy; Satyajeet Misra; Balethbail Suparna
Journal:  J Neurosurg Anesthesiol       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 3.956

2.  ACC/AHA 2007 Guidelines on Perioperative Cardiovascular Evaluation and Care for Noncardiac Surgery: Executive Summary: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Revise the 2002 Guidelines on Perioperative Cardiovascular Evaluation for Noncardiac Surgery): Developed in Collaboration With the American Society of Echocardiography, American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, Heart Rhythm Society, Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, Society for Vascular Medicine and Biology, and Society for Vascular Surgery.

Authors:  Lee A Fleisher; Joshua A Beckman; Kenneth A Brown; Hugh Calkins; Elliott Chaikof; Kirsten E Fleischmann; William K Freeman; James B Froehlich; Edward K Kasper; Judy R Kersten; Barbara Riegel; John F Robb; Sidney C Smith; Alice K Jacobs; Cynthia D Adams; Jeffrey L Anderson; Elliott M Antman; Christopher E Buller; Mark A Creager; Steven M Ettinger; David P Faxon; Valentin Fuster; Jonathan L Halperin; Loren F Hiratzka; Sharon A Hunt; Bruce W Lytle; Rick Nishimura; Joseph P Ornato; Richard L Page; Barbara Riegel; Lynn G Tarkington; Clyde W Yancy
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2007-09-27       Impact factor: 29.690

3.  Intraoperative determination of cardiac output using multiplane transesophageal echocardiography: a comparison to thermodilution.

Authors:  A C Perrino; S N Harris; M A Luther
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 7.892

4.  Performance of a new pulse contour method for continuous cardiac output monitoring: validation in critically ill patients.

Authors:  K Bendjelid; G Marx; N Kiefer; T P Simon; M Geisen; A Hoeft; N Siegenthaler; C K Hofer
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  2013-04-26       Impact factor: 9.166

5.  European Association of Echocardiography recommendations for the assessment of valvular regurgitation. Part 2: mitral and tricuspid regurgitation (native valve disease).

Authors:  Patrizio Lancellotti; Luis Moura; Luc A Pierard; Eustachio Agricola; Bogdan A Popescu; Christophe Tribouilloy; Andreas Hagendorff; Jean-Luc Monin; Luigi Badano; Jose L Zamorano
Journal:  Eur J Echocardiogr       Date:  2010-05

Review 6.  Newer methods of cardiac output monitoring.

Authors:  Yatin Mehta; Dheeraj Arora
Journal:  World J Cardiol       Date:  2014-09-26

7.  Does the central venous pressure predict fluid responsiveness? An updated meta-analysis and a plea for some common sense.

Authors:  Paul E Marik; Rodrigo Cavallazzi
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 7.598

8.  The effectiveness of right heart catheterization in the initial care of critically ill patients. SUPPORT Investigators.

Authors:  A F Connors; T Speroff; N V Dawson; C Thomas; F E Harrell; D Wagner; N Desbiens; L Goldman; A W Wu; R M Califf; W J Fulkerson; H Vidaillet; S Broste; P Bellamy; J Lynn; W A Knaus
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1996-09-18       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 9.  Aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage and the anaesthetist.

Authors:  H-J Priebe
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  2007-05-23       Impact factor: 9.166

10.  Clinical validation of a new thermodilution system for the assessment of cardiac output and volumetric parameters.

Authors:  Nicholas Kiefer; Christoph K Hofer; Gernot Marx; Martin Geisen; Raphaël Giraud; Nils Siegenthaler; Andreas Hoeft; Karim Bendjelid; Steffen Rex
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2012-05-30       Impact factor: 9.097

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.