BACKGROUND: Despite extensive preoperative evaluation, a significant proportion of patients with biliary cancer (BC) proves to be unresectable at laparotomy. Diagnostic laparoscopy (DL) has been suggested to avoid unnecessary laparotomy. Aim of the study was to evaluate the additional benefit of combining LUS to DL in patients with proximal BC. METHODS: Inclusion criteria were all patients affected by proximal BC undergone DL + LUS based on the following criteria: preoperative diagnosis of gallbladder cancer, hilar cholangiocarcinomas (HC) and borderline resectable intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (IHC). The overall yield (OY) and accuracy (AC) of DL ± LUS in determining unresectable disease were calculated. RESULTS: From 01/2006 to 12/2014, 107 out of 191 (56%) potentially resectable proximal BC were evaluated. One hundred patients fulfilled inclusion criteria: 44 IHC, 21 GC and 35 HC. Forty-eight (48%) patients were male with median age of 65 (41-87) years. The median number of preoperative imaging was 3 ± 0.99. Patients underwent DL + LUS 10.5 ± 15.6 days after last imaging. DL + LUS identified unresectable diseases in 24 patients, 6 (25%) of them only thanks to LUS findings (3 GC and 3 IHC). At laparotomy, 6 (4 HC and 2 GC) out of 76 patients were found unresectable because of carcinomatosis (n = 2), new liver metastasis (n = 2) and vascular invasion (n = 2). LUS increased the OY (from 18 to 24%) and AC (from 60 to 80%) in the whole group. The advantages of LUS were confirmed for GC (OY from 38.1 to 52.4%, AC from 61.5 to 84.6%) and IHC patients (OY from 11.4 to 18.2%, AC from 62.5 to 100%) but not for HC group. The presence of biliary drainage was the only factor able to predict negative yield (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: LUS increases overall yield and accuracy of DL for detecting unresectable disease in patients with preoperative diagnosis of gallbladder cancer and borderline resectable intrahepatic cholangiocarcinomas.
BACKGROUND: Despite extensive preoperative evaluation, a significant proportion of patients with biliary cancer (BC) proves to be unresectable at laparotomy. Diagnostic laparoscopy (DL) has been suggested to avoid unnecessary laparotomy. Aim of the study was to evaluate the additional benefit of combining LUS to DL in patients with proximal BC. METHODS: Inclusion criteria were all patients affected by proximal BC undergone DL + LUS based on the following criteria: preoperative diagnosis of gallbladder cancer, hilar cholangiocarcinomas (HC) and borderline resectable intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (IHC). The overall yield (OY) and accuracy (AC) of DL ± LUS in determining unresectable disease were calculated. RESULTS: From 01/2006 to 12/2014, 107 out of 191 (56%) potentially resectable proximal BC were evaluated. One hundred patients fulfilled inclusion criteria: 44 IHC, 21 GC and 35 HC. Forty-eight (48%) patients were male with median age of 65 (41-87) years. The median number of preoperative imaging was 3 ± 0.99. Patients underwent DL + LUS 10.5 ± 15.6 days after last imaging. DL + LUS identified unresectable diseases in 24 patients, 6 (25%) of them only thanks to LUS findings (3 GC and 3 IHC). At laparotomy, 6 (4 HC and 2 GC) out of 76 patients were found unresectable because of carcinomatosis (n = 2), new liver metastasis (n = 2) and vascular invasion (n = 2). LUS increased the OY (from 18 to 24%) and AC (from 60 to 80%) in the whole group. The advantages of LUS were confirmed for GC (OY from 38.1 to 52.4%, AC from 61.5 to 84.6%) and IHC patients (OY from 11.4 to 18.2%, AC from 62.5 to 100%) but not for HC group. The presence of biliary drainage was the only factor able to predict negative yield (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: LUS increases overall yield and accuracy of DL for detecting unresectable disease in patients with preoperative diagnosis of gallbladder cancer and borderline resectable intrahepatic cholangiocarcinomas.
Authors: W R Jarnagin; Y Fong; R P DeMatteo; M Gonen; E C Burke; J Bodniewicz BS; M Youssef BA; D Klimstra; L H Blumgart Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2001-10 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: Saxon Connor; Emma Barron; Stephen J Wigmore; Krishnakumar K Madhavan; Rowan W Parks; O James Garden Journal: J Gastrointest Surg Date: 2005-04 Impact factor: 3.452
Authors: D Goere; G D Wagholikar; P Pessaux; N Carrère; A Sibert; V Vilgrain; A Sauvanet; J Belghiti Journal: Surg Endosc Date: 2006-02-27 Impact factor: 4.584
Authors: Hauke Lang; Georgios C Sotiropoulos; Nils R Frühauf; Marco Dömland; Andreas Paul; Eva-Maria Kind; Massimo Malagó; Christoph E Broelsch Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2005-01 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: Lotte C Franken; Robert Jan S Coelen; Eva Roos; Joanne Verheij; Saffire S Phoa; Marc G Besselink; Olivier R C Busch; Thomas M van Gulik Journal: Visc Med Date: 2020-03-03
Authors: Robert J S Coelen; Anthony T Ruys; Marc G H Besselink; Olivier R C Busch; Thomas M van Gulik Journal: Surg Endosc Date: 2016-02-19 Impact factor: 4.584
Authors: Robert J S Coelen; Anthony T Ruys; Jimme K Wiggers; Chung Y Nio; Joanne Verheij; Dirk J Gouma; Marc G H Besselink; Olivier R C Busch; Thomas M van Gulik Journal: Ann Surg Oncol Date: 2016-09-01 Impact factor: 5.344
Authors: Maciej Sebastian; Maciej Sroczyński; Piotr Donizy; Jerzy Rudnicki Journal: Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne Date: 2017-07-03 Impact factor: 1.195