| Literature DB >> 29062114 |
Lorenzo Guzzetti1, Andrea Galimberti1, Ilaria Bruni1, Chiara Magoni1, Maura Ferri2,3, Annalisa Tassoni2, Enrico Sangiovanni4, Mario Dell'Agli4, Massimo Labra5.
Abstract
ABSRACT: The most anthropized regions of the world are characterized by an impressive abundance of invasive plants, which alter local biodiversity and ecosystem services. An alternative strategy to manage these species could be based on the exploitation of their fruits in a framework of bioprospecting to obtain high-added value compounds or phytocomplexes that are useful for humans. Here we tested this hypothesis on three invasive plants (Lonicera japonica Thunb., Phytolacca americana L., and Prunus serotina Ehrh.) in the Po plain (northern Italy) which bear fruits that are highly consumed by frugivorous birds and therefore dispersed over large distances. Our biochemical analyses revealed that unripe fruit shows high antioxidant properties due to the presence of several classes of polyphenols, which have a high benchmark value on the market. Fruit collection for phytochemical extraction could really prevent seed dispersal mediated by frugivorous animals and produce economic gains to support local management actions.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2017 PMID: 29062114 PMCID: PMC5653781 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-14183-5
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1Study area. Location of the Italian Po Plain in the Western Palearctic region (upper right box) and sampling sites (1: Cassinazza di Baselica; 2: Valle Lambro Park; 3: Ticino Park). Mountain chains are indicated in light gray, whereas the parks investigated in this study are indicated in dark gray. Arrows represent some of the main bird migration routes crossing the Po plain region. The map has been generated using QGis desktop 2.18.3 and modified with Adobe Photoshop CC. The source map was downloaded from the public dataset (http://thematicmapping.org/downloads/world_borders.php) licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/).
Figure 2Yields of the hydro-alcoholic (A) and aqueous (B) extractions conducted on fruits from the three invasive plant species and the control species V. myrtillus. Data are reported as mg of dry powder obtained from 1 g of fresh fruit and expressed as the mean ± standard deviation (SD). The letters above each bar indicate the results of Duncan’s multiple range test (p < 0.05). Average values with standard deviation followed by the same letters are not significantly different.
Figure 3Results of DPPH (A,B) and Folin-Ciocalteu assays (C,D). Results are showed for the hydro-alcoholic extraction (A,C) and the aqueous one (B,D) conducted on fruits of the three investigated invasive plants and the control species V. myrtillus. Green bars refer to the unripe fruits, whereas red bars indicate ripe ones. White dots express the mean values and the bars represent the 95% confidence interval. TE: Trolox Equivalents; GAE: Gallic Acid Equivalents.
Summary of regression analyses to assess biological and chemical variables influencing the antioxidant activity of invasive plant species extracts.
| Species | Best model | Chemical variables | Biological variables | Interaction between variables | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Polyphenols | Solvent | Ripening | Polyphenols*Ripening | Polyphenols*Solvent | ||
| GLS, ΔAICc = 9.27 | Value: 2.86; t-value: 5.42; P < 0.001 | Value: 176.17; t-value: 1.85; P = 0.0715 | — | Value: −0.79; t-value: −2.92; P = 0.0056 | — | |
| LM, Adj. | Value: 2.97; t-value: 5.38; P < 0.001 | — | Value: −113.20, t-value: −2.00; P = 0.052 | Value: 1.04; t-value: 1.44; P = 0.158 | Value: −0.27; t-value: −1.45; P = 0.154 | |
| GLS, ΔAICc = 7.81 | Value: 2.83; t-value: 6.96; P < 0.001 | — | Value: −290.18; t-value: −8.35; P < 0.001 | — | Value: −1.29; t-value: −9.99; P < 0.001 | |
For each investigated species, the best fitting model was selected by evaluation of the ΔAICc. Empty fields indicate that the variable considered was not significant and detrimental to the model.
Characterization of the main important classes of polyphenols by spectrophotometric analyses.
| Species | Ripening | Extraction | Flavonoids (mg CAT eq *g−1) | Catechins (mg CAT eq *g−1) | Hydroxicinnamic acids (mg FA eq *g−1) | Tannins (mg*g−1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| unripe | HA | 34.14 ± 0.18 | Undet. | 386.78 ± 15.08 | 38.37 ± 2.27 | |
| A | 19.69 ± 0.27 | Undet. | 117.05 ± 5.36 | 21.40 ± 1.61 | ||
| ripe | HA | 12.37 ± 0.48 | Undet. | 52.06 ± 4.66 | 13.02 ± 0.43 | |
| A | 16.06 ± 0.45 | Undet. | 166.41 ± 52.21 | 18.49 ± 0.52 | ||
| unripe | HA | 36.54 ± 0.36 | Undet. | 44.76 ± 4.67 | 12.85 ± 1.90 | |
| A | 6.43 ± 0.04 | Undet. | 7.06 ± 2.32 | 4.65 ± 0.00 | ||
| ripe | HA | 27.50 ± 5.09 | Undet. | 17.00 ± 0.00 | Undet. | |
| A | 3.65 ± 0.00 | Undet. | 3.68 ± 0.42 | Undet. | ||
| unripe | HA | 53.10 ± 0.14 | 16.39 ± 0.62 | 374.08 ± 31.74 | 82.15 ± 1.35 | |
| A | 72.90 ± 2.97 | 73.69 ± 9.79 | 650.60 ± 62.84 | 96.15 ± 0.55 | ||
| ripe | HA | 10.18 ± 1.59 | Undet. | 200.84 ± 24.19 | 21.20 ± 1.85 | |
| A | 9.83 ± 1.27 | Undet. | 159.33 ± 18.41 | 17.45 ± 0.20 | ||
| unripe | HA | 32.75 ± 0.78 | 20.21 ± 1.95 | 252.67 ± 19.33 | 69.25 ± 2.60 | |
| A | 26.10 ± 0.14 | 4.42 ± 0.26 | 263.05 ± 20.35 | 39.80 ± 0.55 | ||
| ripe | HA | 7.79 ± 2.82 | Undet. | 68.02 ± 18.01 | 25.30 ± 3.35 | |
| A | 5.54 ± 0.91 | Undet. | 46.68 ± 4.18 | 19.35 ± 0.40 |
Hydro-alcoholic (HA) and aqueous (A) extracts of L. japonica, P. americana, P. serotina and the reference species V. myrtillus. Data are expressed as mg of catechin (CAT) and mg of ferulic acid (FA) equivalents per gram of lyophilized extract for flavonoids (including catechins) and hydroxicinnamic acids respectively, and as mg of detected compounds per g of dry extract for tannins. Results are the mean of three replicates ± Standard Deviation (SD).
Seed viability and the bioprospecting value of the three invasive plant species.
| Species | Ripening | Viability | Extraction | Yields dry extract (g) * 100 fruits−1 | Valuable compounds (mg*100 fruits−1) | Market price (€/mg) | Value (€) * 100 fruits |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| unripe | — | HA | 0.883 | 2.066 | 12.863 | ||
| 0.0026 | 0.008 | ||||||
| 0.970 | 0.575 | ||||||
| A | 1.842 | 2.066 | 3.117 | ||||
| 0.0026 | 0.003 | ||||||
| 0.970 | 0.346 | ||||||
| ripe | 54% | HA | 0.749 | 2.066 | 2.444 | ||
| 0.0026 | 0.003 | ||||||
| 0.970 | 0.344 | ||||||
| A | 1.631 | 2.066 | 2.675 | ||||
| 0.0026 | 0.003 | ||||||
| 0.970 | 0.647 | ||||||
| unripe | — | HA | 4.249 | 0.0026 | 0.020 | ||
| 4.496 | 10.872 | ||||||
| A | 7.069 | 0.0026 | 0.001 | ||||
| ripe | 56% | HA | 2.931 | 0.0026 | 0.009 | ||
| 16.790 | 38.480 | ||||||
| A | 4.853 | 16.790 | 56.130 | ||||
| unripe | — | HA | 1.125 | 0.16 | 0.565 | ||
| 0.0026 | 0.052 | ||||||
| 0.54 | 0.360 | ||||||
| 68 | 6.800 | ||||||
| A | 2.207 | 0.160 | 1.130 | ||||
| 0.0026 | 0.111 | ||||||
| 16.790 | 30.730 | ||||||
| 68 | 27.000 | ||||||
| ripe | 72% | HA | 3.135 | 0.16 | 0.307 | ||
| 0.0026 | 0.004 | ||||||
| 16.790 | 77.120 | ||||||
| A | 3.429 | 0.16 | 0.390 | ||||
| 0.0026 | 0.002 |
For each species, the percentage of viable seeds assessed by the tetrazolium-chloride test is reported. Yields of extraction and the quantification of high-valuable compounds for each ripening stage and protocol of extraction are provided. Moreover, the market price of each metabolite was reported. The number of fruits considered = 100.