Literature DB >> 29061741

In Vitro Antibacterial Properties of Cefiderocol, a Novel Siderophore Cephalosporin, against Gram-Negative Bacteria.

Akinobu Ito1, Takafumi Sato2, Merime Ota2, Miki Takemura2, Toru Nishikawa2, Shinsuke Toba2, Naoki Kohira2, Satoshi Miyagawa2, Naoki Ishibashi2, Shuhei Matsumoto2, Rio Nakamura2, Masakatsu Tsuji2, Yoshinori Yamano2.   

Abstract

Cefiderocol (CFDC; S-649266), a novel parenteral siderophore cephalosporin conjugated with a catechol moiety, has a characteristic antibacterial spectrum with a potent activity against a broad range of aerobic Gram-negative bacterial species, including carbapenem-resistant strains of Enterobacteriaceae and nonfermenting bacteria such as Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Acinetobacter baumannii Cefiderocol has affinity mainly for penicillin-binding protein 3 (PBP3) of Enterobacteriaceae and nonfermenting bacteria similar to that of ceftazidime. A deficiency of the iron transporter PiuA in P. aeruginosa or both CirA and Fiu in Escherichia coli caused 16-fold increases in cefiderocol MICs, suggesting that these iron transporters contribute to the permeation of cefiderocol across the outer membrane. The deficiency of OmpK35/36 in Klebsiella pneumoniae and the overproduction of efflux pump MexA-MexB-OprM in P. aeruginosa showed no significant impact on the activity of cefiderocol.
Copyright © 2017 Ito et al.

Entities:  

Keywords:  PBP; cefiderocol; efflux pump; iron transporter; morphology; penicillin-binding protein; porin; time kill

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29061741      PMCID: PMC5740388          DOI: 10.1128/AAC.01454-17

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother        ISSN: 0066-4804            Impact factor:   5.191


INTRODUCTION

Nosocomial infections caused by Gram-negative bacteria are increasingly difficult to treat due to the global spread of multidrug-resistant (MDR) strains which are resistant to several antibiotics, such as carbapenems, cephalosporins, aminoglycosides, and quinolones (1). The WHO has listed carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE), carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii as the pathogens against which urgent development of new antibiotics are needed, since the emergence of these resistant pathogens poses serious public health issues due to the limited number of treatment options (2, 3). Since the 1980s, numerous attempts to conjugate iron-binding functional groups onto β-lactams have been made to hijack the iron uptake systems of Gram-negative bacteria and circumvent the outer membrane barriers (4–6). However, none of the molecules have been approved for clinical use for various reasons, such as a lack of correlation between in vitro and in vivo efficacies (7–9). Cefiderocol (CFDC; S-649266), a novel catechol-substituted siderophore cephalosporin, is structurally different from other recently developed hydroxypyridone-substituted siderophore monobactam antibiotics such as BAL30072, MB-1, and MC-1 and has been reported to have potent antibacterial activity against MDR Gram-negative pathogens, including carbapenem-resistant strains of Enterobacteriaceae, P. aeruginosa, and A. baumannii, as well as potent in vivo efficacy against multiple clinical strains of Gram-negative bacteria in mouse lung infection models (10–14, 34; I. Ghazi, M. L. Monogue, M. Tsuji, and D. P. Nicolau, submitted for publication). This is the first report evaluating the in vitro features of cefiderocol, including its antibacterial spectrum against Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacteria and its mode of action, such as penicillin-binding protein (PBP) binding affinity and morphological changes, as well as the impacts of various β-lactamases, efflux pump overexpression, and deficiency of porin or iron transporter on the in vitro activity.

RESULTS

Antibacterial activity against Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacteria.

The MICs of cefiderocol were ≤2 μg/ml against a broad range of Gram-negative bacterial strains, including Enterobacteriaceae such as Enterobacter spp., Escherichia coli, Klebsiella spp., Proteus spp., Providencia spp., Salmonella spp., and Yersinia spp., as well as Vibrio species (Table 1). Cefiderocol showed in vitro activity against nonfermenting bacteria such as Acinetobacter spp., Pseudomonas spp., and Burkholderia spp.; cefiderocol also showed in vitro activity against the intrinsically MDR bacteria of Stenotrophomonas maltophilia and Elizabethkingia meningoseptica, as well as the causative pathogens for respiratory tract infections, such as Haemophilus spp., Moraxella catarrhalis, and Bordetella parapertussis. On the other hand, the MICs of cefiderocol against Campylobacter jejuni ATCC 33560 and 794009 as well as ceftriaxone-resistant Neisseria gonorrhoeae 868339 were relatively high (MIC, >4 μg/ml) for the Gram-negative bacteria tested, although the MICs of cefiderocol against two other N. gonorrhoeae strains, including an azithromycin-resistant strain, were ≤0.5 μg/ml. The MICs of cefiderocol against aerobic Gram-positive bacteria growing in an aerobic or microaerophilic atmosphere were ≥4 μg/ml, except for those against Streptococcus pneumoniae ATCC 49619, Streptococcus pyogenes ATCC 10389, and Micrococcus luteus ATCC 9341, which were 2, 1, and 4 μg/ml, respectively. The activities against these strains of Gram-positive bacteria were weaker than those of other tested β-lactam compounds. The MICs of cefiderocol against anaerobic Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacteria showed variation within genera and were higher than those of cefepime or meropenem, with cefiderocol MICs of 0.5 to >32 μg/ml, except for that against Fusobacterium necrophorum, which was ≤0.031 μg/ml (Table 2). Although cefiderocol showed activity against some ATCC strains of Bacteroides spp., Prevotella spp., and Clostridium spp., with MICs of 1 to 2 μg/ml, cefiderocol did not show potent activity against multiple clinical isolates of Bacteroides spp., Prevotella spp., or Clostridium difficile, of which the MIC50s were 32 μg/ml or higher (Table 3).
TABLE 1

MICs of cefiderocol and other antibiotics against Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacteria

OrganismStrainMIC (μg/ml)f
CFDCCAZCFPMMEPMPIPC-TAZCAZ-AVICFT-TAZCOLAMKCPFX
Gram-negative bacteria
    Acinetobacter baumanniiATCC 196060.0638161161620.5161
    Acinetobacter calcoaceticusATCC 230550.0630.1250.063≤0.031≤0.0310.063≤0.0310.250.25≤0.031
    Acinetobacter haemolyticusATCC 17906≤0.031210.25≤0.0314≤0.0311>320.125
    Acinetobacter johnsoniiATCC 179090.125820.25≤0.03116≤0.0310.2510.25
    Acinetobacter lwoffiiATCC 15309≤0.03110.250.063≤0.0312≤0.0310.1250.50.25
    Aeromonas hydrophilaIFO38200.1250.50.063240.251>322≤0.031
    Bordetella parapertussisNCTC 5952111≤0.031≤0.0310.51≤0.0312≤0.031
    Burkholderia cepaciaATCC 25416≤0.03143243222>32>321
    Burkholderia multivoransSR0186922324>3224>32>324
    Campylobacter jejuniATCC 33560>4>1620.015644NTNTNT0.25
    Campylobacter jejuni794009>4>1620.015644NTNTNT>4
    Citrobacter freundiiATCC 80900.0631≤0.031≤0.03110.1250.250.52≤0.031
    Elizabethkingia meningosepticaNCTC 100161>32>3216>32>32>32>32328
    Enterobacter aerogenesATCC 13048≤0.03110.0630.06340.50.50.252≤0.031
    Enterobacter cloacaeATCC 130470.580.1250.063160.58>322≤0.031
    Enterobacter cloacaeaNCTC 134640.125280.06320.250.50.252≤0.031
    Escherichia coliATCC 259220.1250.50.125≤0.03120.50.250.51≤0.031
    Escherichia coliATCC 35218≤0.0310.250.125≤0.03110.1250.250.52≤0.031
    Escherichia coliaNCTC 1346228>32≤0.0312120.2540.25
    Haemophilus influenzaeATCC 102110.250.063≤0.0310.063≤0.031≤0.0310.1250.258≤0.031
    Haemophilus influenzaeATCC 4924720.510.1250.1250.12510.258≤0.031
    Haemophilus parainfluenzaeATCC 79010.25≤0.031≤0.031≤0.031≤0.031≤0.031≤0.0310.251≤0.031
    Klebsiella oxytocaATCC 131820.0630.250.1250.06340.50.50.2520.063
    Klebsiella pneumoniaeATCC 43816≤0.0310.1250.0630.06320.250.250.2510.063
    Moraxella catarrhalisATCC 25238≤0.0310.0630.125≤0.031≤0.0310.063≤0.03110.5≤0.031
    Morganella morganniiATCC 25830≤0.0310.1250.0630.125≤0.0310.0630.125>321≤0.031
    Neisseria gonorrhoeaeATCC 492260.50.120.120.03≤0.250.12NTNTNT0.004
    Neisseria gonorrhoeaeb8678070.250.120.060.015≤0.250.12NTNTNT0.008
    Neisseria gonorrhoeaec868339>4>16>80.061>16NTNTNT>4
    Neisseria meningitidisATCC 130770.1250.063≤0.031≤0.031≤0.031≤0.031≤0.031>328≤0.031
    Proteus mirabilisATCC 29906≤0.0310.250.1250.1250.50.1250.5>324≤0.031
    Proteus vulgarisATCC 13315≤0.0310.1250.0630.125≤0.0310.0630.25320.5≤0.031
    Providencia alcalifaciensATCC 9886≤0.0310.250.0630.06320.250.125>324≤0.031
    Providencia rettgeriATCC 29944≤0.0310.2510.06340.25>32>320.5≤0.031
    Providencia stuartiiATCC 29914≤0.0310.250.0630.12510.50.25>320.5≤0.031
    Pseudomonas aeruginosaATCC 278530.5220.25220.50.540.25
    Pseudomonas aeruginosadNCTC 134370.5>32>32>32>32>32>3213232
    Pseudomonas putidaATCC 126330.125221820.50.50.50.063
    Pseudomonas stutzeriiATCC 116070.1250.50.1250.12520.50.1250.1250.5≤0.031
    Salmonella enterica serovar CholeraesuisATCC 517410.0150.50.060.0340.5NTNTNT0.03
    Salmonella enterica serovar EnteritidisG-140.2510.063≤0.03120.51116≤0.031
    Salmonella enterica serovar Paratyphi5989890.060.50.060.0340.25NTNTNT>4
    Salmonella enterica serovar Typhi6739370.0150.50.120.0320.25NTNTNT>4
    Salmonella enterica serovar TyphimuriumATCC 13311≤0.0310.50.063≤0.03140.50.50.52≤0.031
    Serratia marcescensATCC 13880≤0.0310.50.250.063210.5>3210.063
    Shigella flexnerie7059270.50.060.250.0320.06NTNTNT0.015
    Stenotrophomonas maltophiliaATCC 136370.12532>32>32>323232140.25
    Vibrio fluvialisNCTC 113270.250.250.250.2540.540.252≤0.031
    Vibrio vulnificusATCC 2756210.51≤0.0310.063≤0.031242≤0.031
    Yersinia enterocoliticaATCC 9610≤0.0310.1250.0630.06310.1250.250.2520.063
    Yersinia pseudotuberculosisATCC 298330.50.250.063≤0.0310.50.250.25>322≤0.031
Gram-positive bacteria
    Bacillus subtilisATCC 663332410.0630.254280.25≤0.031
    Enterococcus faecalisATCC 29212>32>321622>3232>32>321
    Lactobacillus caseiATCC 393>3243210.542>3221
    Micrococcus luteusATCC 934140.5≤0.0310.063≤0.0310.50.5>3212
    Staphylococcus aureusATCC 2921332880.1251832>3220.5
    Streptococcus pneumoniaeATCC 4961920.5≤0.0310.0630.50.50.25>32320.5
    Streptococcus pyogenesATCC 1038910.125≤0.031≤0.0310.0630.1250.125>32160.125

CTX-M type β-lactamase producer.

Resistant to azithromycin.

Resistant to ceftriaxone.

VIM-10 and VEB-1 β-lactamase producer.

Resistant to tetracycline and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole.

MICs of cefiderocol (CFDC) were determined in iron-depleted cation-adjusted Mueller Hinton broth (ID-CAMHB), and those of other antibiotics were determined in CAMHB except when the following was used (see supplemental method 2): (i) CAMHB supplemented with 2.5 to 5.0% lysed horse blood for B. parapertussis, Streptococcus pneumoniae, Streptococcus pyogenes, Campylobacter jejuni, Neisseria meningitidis, and Lactobacillus casei, (ii) Haemophilus test medium broth for Haemophilus spp., or (iii) GC agar supplemented with 1% defined growth supplement for Neisseria gonorrhoeae, except for meropenem, which was determined on GC agar supplemented with 1% defined growth supplement without cysteine component. NT, not tested; CFDC, cefiderocol; CAZ, ceftazidime; CFPM, cefepime; MEPM, meropenem; PIPC-TAZ, piperacillin-tazobactam; CAZ-AVI, ceftazidime-avibactam; CFT-TAZ, ceftolozane-tazobactam; COL, colistin; AMK, amikacin; CPFX, ciprofloxacin. TAZ and AVI were at a fixed concentration of 4 μg/ml. MICs of PIPC-TAZ, CAZ-AVI, and CFT-TAZ are represented as the concentrations of PIPC, CAZ, and CFT, respectively.

TABLE 2

MICs of cefiderocol and other antibiotics against anaerobic bacteria

OrganismStrainMIC (μg/ml)a
CefiderocolCefepimeMeropenemCiprofloxacinMetronidazole
Gram-negative bacteria
    Bacteroides fragilisATCC 252852320.06320.25
    Bacteroides thetaiotaomicronATCC 29741>32>320.125161
    Fusobacterium mortiferumATCC 25557>32>320.2520.5
    Fusobacterium necrophorumATCC 25286≤0.031≤0.031≤0.03110.125
    Mobiluncus curtisiiATCC 3524110.25≤0.0310.52
    Prevotella biviaATCC 29303>32>320.25321
    Prevotella intermediaATCC 2561110.25≤0.0310.50.5
    Prevotella melaninogenicaATCC 2584520.25≤0.03110.5
    Veillonella parvulaATCC 107903210.1250.1252
Gram-positive bacteria
    Bifidobacterium bifidumATCC 295210.50.063≤0.03184
    Clostridium difficileATCC 700057>32>32180.125
    Clostridium perfringensATCC 1312410.25≤0.0310.250.5
    Collinsella aerofaciensATCC 25986>3220.12510.5
    Eubacterium limosumATCC 84860.5≤0.031≤0.03110.125
    Finegoldia magnaATCC 29328880.0630.250.5
    Parvimonas micraATCC 3327010.125≤0.0310.50.5
    Peptoniphilus asaccharolyticusATCC 14963320.063≤0.0310.50.5
    Peptostreptococcus anaerobiusATCC 2733780.50.2510.25
    Propionibacterium acnesATCC 691980.5≤0.0310.5>32

MICs were determined on brucella agar supplemented with hemin, vitamin K1, and laked sheep blood.

TABLE 3

MIC50s and MIC90s of cefiderocol and other antibiotics against anaerobic bacteria

Organism (no. of strains)aMIC50/MIC90 (μg/ml)b
CefiderocolCefepimeMeropenemCiprofloxacinMetronidazole
Bacteroides spp. (83)>32/>32>32/>320.125/216/>320.5/1
Prevotella spp. (37)32/>324/>32≤0.031/0.1251/>320.5/2
C. difficile (38)>32/>32>32/>321/28/>320.125/0.125

Bacteriodes spp. consisted of B. caccae (4 strains), B. fragilis (52), B. fragilis group (9), B. ovatus (2), B. stercoris (1), B. thetaiotaomicron (11), and B. vulgatus (4). Prevotella spp. consisted of P. bivia (11 strains), P. buccae (7), P. disiens (4), P. intermedia (10), P. melaninogenica (1), P. oralis (1), and Prevotella species (6).

MICs were determined on brucella agar supplemented with hemin, vitamin K1, and laked sheep blood.

MICs of cefiderocol and other antibiotics against Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacteria CTX-M type β-lactamase producer. Resistant to azithromycin. Resistant to ceftriaxone. VIM-10 and VEB-1 β-lactamase producer. Resistant to tetracycline and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole. MICs of cefiderocol (CFDC) were determined in iron-depleted cation-adjusted Mueller Hinton broth (ID-CAMHB), and those of other antibiotics were determined in CAMHB except when the following was used (see supplemental method 2): (i) CAMHB supplemented with 2.5 to 5.0% lysed horse blood for B. parapertussis, Streptococcus pneumoniae, Streptococcus pyogenes, Campylobacter jejuni, Neisseria meningitidis, and Lactobacillus casei, (ii) Haemophilus test medium broth for Haemophilus spp., or (iii) GC agar supplemented with 1% defined growth supplement for Neisseria gonorrhoeae, except for meropenem, which was determined on GC agar supplemented with 1% defined growth supplement without cysteine component. NT, not tested; CFDC, cefiderocol; CAZ, ceftazidime; CFPM, cefepime; MEPM, meropenem; PIPC-TAZ, piperacillin-tazobactam; CAZ-AVI, ceftazidime-avibactam; CFT-TAZ, ceftolozane-tazobactam; COL, colistin; AMK, amikacin; CPFX, ciprofloxacin. TAZ and AVI were at a fixed concentration of 4 μg/ml. MICs of PIPC-TAZ, CAZ-AVI, and CFT-TAZ are represented as the concentrations of PIPC, CAZ, and CFT, respectively. MICs of cefiderocol and other antibiotics against anaerobic bacteria MICs were determined on brucella agar supplemented with hemin, vitamin K1, and laked sheep blood. MIC50s and MIC90s of cefiderocol and other antibiotics against anaerobic bacteria Bacteriodes spp. consisted of B. caccae (4 strains), B. fragilis (52), B. fragilis group (9), B. ovatus (2), B. stercoris (1), B. thetaiotaomicron (11), and B. vulgatus (4). Prevotella spp. consisted of P. bivia (11 strains), P. buccae (7), P. disiens (4), P. intermedia (10), P. melaninogenica (1), P. oralis (1), and Prevotella species (6). MICs were determined on brucella agar supplemented with hemin, vitamin K1, and laked sheep blood.

Antibacterial activity against Gram-negative bacteria harboring various β-lactamases.

Cefiderocol exhibited potent in vitro activity against 33 strains of Gram-negative bacteria harboring various kinds of β-lactamases, including extended-spectrum β-lactamases (ESBLs) and carbapenemases (Table 4). The MICs of cefiderocol were 8 μg/ml or lower against all the test strains, including carbapenemase producers such as Klebsiella pneumoniae harboring NDM-1, KPC, or GES-4, P. aeruginosa harboring VIM or IMP-1, and A. baumannii harboring OXA-23 and/or OXA-51-like or OXA-58. Other tested antibiotics, including various classes of β-lactams, amikacin, and ciprofloxacin, showed less activity against most of these carbapenemase producers, with MICs of 16 μg/ml or more, while colistin showed MICs of 1 μg/ml or lower.
TABLE 4

MICs of cefiderocol against Gram-negative bacteria harboring β-lactamases

OrganismStrainβ-Lactamase(s)MIC (μg/ml)a
CFDCCAZCFPMMEPMPIPC-TAZCAZ-AVICFT-TAZCOLAMKCPFX
E. coliSR34250CTX-M-14, TEM-10.12524≤0.03120.250.50.25232
E. coliSR34201CTX-M-15, TEM-12>32>320.06320.250.50.5232
E. coliSR34241CTX-M-27188≤0.03120.250.50.252>32
E. coliATCC BAA-196TEM-101>324≤0.0318220.2580.25
E. coliATCC BAA-198TEM-260.5>324≤0.0314110.2520.25
K. pneumoniaeATCC 51983SHV-50.5>3220.06320.2510.52≤0.031
K. pneumoniaeATCC 700603SHV-181320.50.063160.510.2510.5
K. pneumoniaeNUBL-KG502GES-40.25>3216163216>320.25320.063
P. aeruginosaSR24837PER-14>32>328>32>32>320.581
K. pneumoniaeVA-360KPC-2, TEM-1, SHV-11, SHV-128>32>32>32>322>320.2516>32
K. pneumoniaeVA-375KPC-3, TEM-1, SHV-11, SHV-142>323232>322>320.258>32
E. coliNUBL-24IMP-11>32>32816>32>320.252>32
P. aeruginosaSR27060IMP-10.25>32>32>32>32>32>3211632
A. baumanniiSBRKM-181IMP-10.125>32>323232>32>320.5160.5
K. pneumoniaeSR08933IMP-60.125>32>32324>32>320.5132
E. coliIR5NDM-1, CTX-M-15, OXA-92>32>32>32>32>32>320.25>32>32
K. pneumoniaeI1NDM-1, SHV-122>32>3232>32>32>328>32>32
K. pneumoniaeKI2NDM-1, OXA-1, CTX-M-15, CMY-6, TEM-1, SHV-28, OXA-94>32>32>32>32>32>320.25>32>32
P. aeruginosaAK54VIM-20.1253216>32>3232>321>3216
P. aeruginosaDM3355VIM-62>32>32>32>32>32>321>32>32
P. aeruginosaP0510VIM-10.53232>32>3232>321>3216
E. coliSR09616CMY-20.125>3210.063320.2540.520.25
K. pneumoniaeNUBL-HKY327CMY-191>32>320.063>32>32>320.2516≤0.031
K. pneumoniaeSR09603CMY-80.06380.1250.2580.250.50.258≤0.031
K. pneumoniaeSR09635DHA0.125>320.1250.125>320.2510.250.50.5
S. marcescensSR36500AmpC0.125810.251628>32164
P. aeruginosaTESSAmpC0.25321616>32420.5>3232
A. baumannii585OXA-230.063>3232>32>328160.25>32>32
A. baumanniiCHAROXA-581>323216>32>32>3216>32>32
A. baumanniiNCTC 13303OXA-26, OXA-51-like0.5>32>32>32>32>32>320.5>32>32
A. baumanniiNCTC 13422OXA-51-like0.5>32>328>32>32>320.5>32>32
A. baumanniiNCTC 13424OXA-23, OXA-51-like≤0.031>323232>3232320.5>32>32
K. pneumoniaePLEOXA-48≤0.031122>320.2510.252>32

MICs of cefiderocol were determined in iron-depleted cation-adjusted Mueller Hinton broth (ID-CAMHB), and those of other antibiotics were determined in CAMHB. CFDC, cefiderocol; CAZ, ceftazidime; CFPM, cefepime; MEPM, meropenem; PIPC-TAZ, piperacillin-tazobactam; CAZ-AVI, ceftazidime-avibactam; CFT-TAZ, ceftolozane-tazobactam; COL, colistin; AMK, amikacin; CPFX, ciprofloxacin. TAZ and AVI were at a fixed concentration of 4 μg/ml. MICs of PIPC-TAZ, CAZ-AVI, and CFT-TAZ are represented as the concentrations of PIPC, CAZ and CFT, respectively.

MICs of cefiderocol against Gram-negative bacteria harboring β-lactamases MICs of cefiderocol were determined in iron-depleted cation-adjusted Mueller Hinton broth (ID-CAMHB), and those of other antibiotics were determined in CAMHB. CFDC, cefiderocol; CAZ, ceftazidime; CFPM, cefepime; MEPM, meropenem; PIPC-TAZ, piperacillin-tazobactam; CAZ-AVI, ceftazidime-avibactam; CFT-TAZ, ceftolozane-tazobactam; COL, colistin; AMK, amikacin; CPFX, ciprofloxacin. TAZ and AVI were at a fixed concentration of 4 μg/ml. MICs of PIPC-TAZ, CAZ-AVI, and CFT-TAZ are represented as the concentrations of PIPC, CAZ and CFT, respectively.

Affinity for penicillin-binding proteins, morphological changes, and time-kill.

The affinities (50% inhibitory concentrations [IC50s]) of cefiderocol for PBPs of E. coli NIHJ JC-2, K. pneumoniae SR22291, P. aeruginosa ATCC 27853, and A. baumannii ATCC 17978 were determined (Table 5). The IC50s of cefiderocol against PBP3 of E. coli NIHJ JC-2, K. pneumoniae SR22291, P. aeruginosa ATCC 27853, and A. baumannii ATCC 17978 were 0.04, 0.062, 0.06, and 0.67 μg/ml, respectively, which were lower than those of ceftazidime, indicating a higher affinity of cefiderocol for PBP3 than that of ceftazidime. Other than its affinity for PBP3, cefiderocol had an affinity for PBP2 of K. pneumoniae SR22291 as ceftazidime did (IC50s of cefiderocol and ceftazidime were 0.063 and 0.41 μg/ml, respectively), and cefiderocol also had an affinity for PBP1a of P. aeruginosa ATCC 27853 as ceftazidime did (IC50s of cefiderocol and ceftazidime were 0.85 and 3.62 μg/ml, respectively). Morphological changes of these four bacteria were examined by phase-contrast microscopy after exposure to cefiderocol (see Fig. S1 and S2 in the supplemental material). Filamentous cells were observed in all the test strains after exposure to cefiderocol, similar to what was observed after exposure to ceftazidime. In the time-kill study with the four strains E. coli NIHJ JC-2, K. pneumoniae SR22291, P. aeruginosa ATCC 27853, and A. baumannii ATCC 17978, cefiderocol reduced the bacterial counts in a manner similar to that of ceftazidime after exposure at 1, 4, or 16 times the MIC, and the killing rates were similar between 4 times and 16 times the MIC (Fig. 1 and 2).
TABLE 5

Affinity of cefiderocol and ceftazidime for penicillin-binding proteins of E. coli NIHJ JC-2, K. pneumoniae SR22291, P. aeruginosa ATCC 27853, and A. baumannii ATCC 17978

PBPIC50 (μg/ml)
E. coli NIHJ JC-2
K. pneumoniae SR22291
P. aeruginosa ATCC 27853
A. baumannii ATCC 17978
a
CefiderocolCeftazidimeCefiderocolCeftazidimeCefiderocolCeftazidimeCefiderocolCeftazidime
PBP1a3.80>42.801.500.853.621.050.91
PBP1b3.37>43.502.30>4>4
PBP22.12>40.0630.41>4>42.31>64
PBP30.040.450.0620.220.060.090.671.78
PBP4NCb>10.283.60>4>4NDcND

The IC50s cannot be divided into separate values for PBP1a and PBP1b.

NC, not calculated. Cefiderocol inhibited 63% of PBP4 at 4 μg/ml, but the sigmoid curve did not fit and the IC50 cannot be calculated.

ND, not detected.

FIG 1

Bactericidal activities of cefiderocol (a and c) and ceftazidime (b and d) against E. coli NIHJ JC-2 (a and b) and K. pneumoniae SR22291 (c and d). ID-CAMHB and CAMHB were used for cefiderocol and ceftazidime, respectively, as the test media.

FIG 2

Bactericidal activities of cefiderocol (a and c) and ceftazidime (b and d) against P. aeruginosa ATCC 27853 (a and b) and A. baumannii ATCC 17978 (c and d). ID-CAMHB and CAMHB were used for cefiderocol and ceftazidime, respectively, as the test media.

Affinity of cefiderocol and ceftazidime for penicillin-binding proteins of E. coli NIHJ JC-2, K. pneumoniae SR22291, P. aeruginosa ATCC 27853, and A. baumannii ATCC 17978 The IC50s cannot be divided into separate values for PBP1a and PBP1b. NC, not calculated. Cefiderocol inhibited 63% of PBP4 at 4 μg/ml, but the sigmoid curve did not fit and the IC50 cannot be calculated. ND, not detected. Bactericidal activities of cefiderocol (a and c) and ceftazidime (b and d) against E. coli NIHJ JC-2 (a and b) and K. pneumoniae SR22291 (c and d). ID-CAMHB and CAMHB were used for cefiderocol and ceftazidime, respectively, as the test media. Bactericidal activities of cefiderocol (a and c) and ceftazidime (b and d) against P. aeruginosa ATCC 27853 (a and b) and A. baumannii ATCC 17978 (c and d). ID-CAMHB and CAMHB were used for cefiderocol and ceftazidime, respectively, as the test media.

Effects of transposon insertion into or deletions of genes relating to outer membrane permeability on the activities.

The effects of the deficiency of iron transporters were examined using P. aeruginosa and E. coli (Table 6 and 7). The MICs of cefiderocol against all the test P. aeruginosa PAO1 derivative mutant strains which have a transposon (Tn) insertion in the genes of iron transporters, including major siderophore receptors for pyoverdine (fpvA and fpvB), pyochelin (fptA), and enterobactin (pirA), ranged from 0.063 to 0.125 μg/ml, equivalent to the MIC against the parent strain PAO1, with the exception of the MICs against the strains having a Tn insertion in the probable iron transport receptor gene piuA (Table 6). The MIC of cefiderocol increased to 2 μg/ml (PW8599) after Tn insertion into piuA, which was complemented by the introduction of wild-type PiuA (SR-L00252). MICs of ceftazidime ranged from 1 to 2 μg/ml against all the tested strains with a Tn insertion in iron transporter-related genes as well as the parent strain PAO1. The MIC of cefiderocol against E. coli BW25113 with deletion of iron transporter gene cirA or fiu was 0.063 or 0.125 μg/ml, within 2-fold of that against the parent strain, whereas the MIC of cefiderocol increased 16-fold by the double knockout of cirA and fiu (Table 7).
TABLE 6

Effects of transposon insertion into genes for iron transporters, efflux pump, and porin on the activities of cefiderocol against P. aeruginosa PAO1

StrainDescriptionaMIC (μg/ml)b
CefiderocolCeftazidimeImipenemCiprofloxacinAztreonam
PAO10.125210.1254
PW1781mexB (Tn)0.063110.0630.25
PW1783oprM (Tn)0.06311≤0.0310.25
PW1776mexR (Tn)0.25810.516
PW7066nalD (Tn)0.25810.516
PW2742oprD (Tn)0.25180.254
PW1861fiuA (Tn)0.0632
PW2689pirA (Tn)0.0632
PW3399pfuA (Tn)0.0632
PW4366feuA (cirA) (Tn)0.0632
PW5036fpvA (Tn)0.0632
PW5144foxA (optS) (Tn)0.1252
PW5503pfeA (Tn)0.0631
PW7590fecA (Tn)0.0631
PW8065fpvB (Tn)0.0632
PW8161fptA (Tn)0.1252
PW8599piuA (Tn)22
SR-L00016piuA (Tn) and pirA (deletion)22
SR-L00197piuA (Tn)/pMMB67HE-Gm21
SR-L00252piuA (Tn)/pMMB67HE-Gm-piuA0.0631

Tn, transposon insertion.

—, not tested. MICs of cefiderocol were determined in ID-CAMHB, and those of references were determined in CAMHB.

TABLE 7

Effects of deletions of genes for iron transporters and porins on the activities of cefiderocol against E. coli BW25113 and K. pneumoniae NVT2001S

StrainDescriptionMIC (μg/ml)a
CefiderocolCeftazidimeMeropenem
E. coli
    BW25113Derivative strain of K-120.0630.25
    BW25113 ΔcirAcirA deletion strain of BW251130.0630.25
    BW25113 Δfiufiu deletion strain of BW251130.1250.125
    BW25113 ΔcirA ΔfiucirA and fiu deletion strain of BW2511310.25
K. pneumoniae
    NVT2001SStreptomycin-resistant isolate of clinical strain NVT20010.0310.1250.016
    NVT2001S ΔompK35ompK35 deletion strain of NVT2001S0.1250.50.031
    NVT2001S ΔompK36ompK36 deletion strain of NVT2001S0.0630.250.031
    NVT2001S ΔompK35/36ompK35 and ompK36 deletion strain of NVT2001S0.0630.50.125

MICs of cefiderocol were determined in ID-CAMHB, and those of references were determined in CAMHB.

Effects of transposon insertion into genes for iron transporters, efflux pump, and porin on the activities of cefiderocol against P. aeruginosa PAO1 Tn, transposon insertion. —, not tested. MICs of cefiderocol were determined in ID-CAMHB, and those of references were determined in CAMHB. Effects of deletions of genes for iron transporters and porins on the activities of cefiderocol against E. coli BW25113 and K. pneumoniae NVT2001S MICs of cefiderocol were determined in ID-CAMHB, and those of references were determined in CAMHB. The MICs of cefiderocol against PAO1 derivative mutant strains which have a Tn insertion in the genes of multidrug efflux pump MexAB-OprM, its transcriptional regulator, and porin OprD, which are involved in β-lactam resistance, were examined (Table 6). MICs of aztreonam against the strains with a Tn insertion in either mexB (PW1781) or oprM (PW1783), which lost the function of the MexAB-OprM efflux pump, were 16-fold lower than that against PAO1, while the decreases in cefiderocol MICs due to a Tn insertion were 2- or 4-fold. The MIC of cefiderocol was also determined against PW1781 and PW1783 in cation-adjusted Mueller-Hinton broth (CAMHB), which contains ferric iron, and the cefiderocol MICs were 0.125 and 0.063 μg/ml, respectively, which were 2- or 4-fold lower, respectively, than that against PAO1, which was 0.25 in CAMHB. The MICs of ceftazidime, aztreonam, and ciprofloxacin against the strains with a Tn insertion in either mexR (PW1776) or nalD (PW7066), which leads to overexpression of the MexAB-OprM efflux pump, were 4-fold higher than that against PAO1, while the increases in cefiderocol MICs due to a Tn insertion were within 2-fold. The MIC of cefiderocol was also determined against PW1776 and PW7066 in CAMHB, and the increases in cefiderocol MICs were also 2-fold compared to that against PAO1. Against the strain with a Tn insertion in oprD, imipenem showed an 8-fold higher MIC than against the parent strain, while the increases in MIC of cefiderocol and other test antibiotics were within 2-fold. The MIC of cefiderocol was determined against K. pneumoniae NVT2001S and its derivative mutant strains, which were deficient in porin ompK35 and/or ompK36, which are involved in resistance to various classes of β-lactam antibiotics, including carbapenems (Table 7). The MIC of meropenem against the double deletion mutant strain was 8-fold higher than that against the parental strain NVT2001S, whereas the increases in MICs of cefiderocol and ceftazidime against strains with deletion of ompK35 and/or ompK36 were 2- to 4-fold that against the parental strain.

DISCUSSION

In comparison to carbapenem antibiotics, cefiderocol has more potent in vitro activity against a broad range of Gram-negative bacteria, including carbapenem-resistant strains of Enterobacteriaceae and nonfermenting bacteria that produce carbapenemases as well as ESBLs and class C β-lactamases, but weaker activity against Gram-positive bacteria and anaerobic bacteria. Cefiderocol has an antibacterial spectrum that is significantly different from that of carbapenem antibiotics, which have been mainly used for the treatment of Gram-negative bacterial infections. The reason for this unique antibacterial spectrum is the active ferric iron uptake by the siderophore, which is observed only in aerobic Gram-negative bacteria. The detailed mode of action on the activity against some of the strains or species among Gram-positives and anaerobic bacteria has not been sufficiently observed. The global surveillance studies of cefiderocol, SIDERO-WT-2014, using recent clinical isolates (n = 9,205) against Enterobacteriaceae and nonfermenting bacteria such as P. aeruginosa, A. baumannii, and S. maltophilia, including MDR strains, and other studies to evaluate the antibacterial activity of cefiderocol against well-characterized carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative pathogens have shown that cefiderocol also has potent activity against these problematic Gram-negative pathogens (10–12). This study revealed that the antibacterial action of cefiderocol is to inhibit mainly PBP3 of Enterobacteriaceae and nonfermenting bacteria, resulting in morphological changes of filamentous cells, similar to the action of ceftazidime. Although the impact of the differences in PBP3 affinity on the in vitro activities of cefiderocol and ceftazidime is not clear, the antibacterial activity of cefiderocol determined by the time-kill experiment was similar to that of ceftazidime. The key features of cefiderocol are its active uptake mechanisms by Gram-negative bacteria under iron-depleted conditions and its improved stability to various types of β-lactamases reported previously (15). In this study, we showed that PiuA is one of the iron transporters of P. aeruginosa that is responsible for the active transport of cefiderocol into bacterial cells resulting in the activity of cefiderocol, as is the case for MC-1 (16). However, the MIC results also showed that PirA, which was reported to be one of the iron transporters responsible for the activity of MC-1 (16), did not contribute to the in vitro activity of cefiderocol. Moreover, this study demonstrated the contribution of both cirA and fiu of E. coli, which has been reported to be involved in the monomeric catechols and whose production is regulated by the availability of ferric iron, to the in vitro activity of cefiderocol (17). The MIC results with mutant strains showed that the effect of the deficiency of the porin OmpK35/36 of K. pneumoniae, which is reported to be one of the resistance determinants coordinated with various β-lactamases against carbapenems (18, 19), on the activity of cefiderocol was not significant, which may also contribute to the potent activity of cefiderocol against such carbapenem-resistant K. pneumoniae strains. In terms of the efflux pump MexAB-OprM of P. aeruginosa, the decrease in the MIC of cefiderocol against the strains with a deficient efflux pump indicates that cefiderocol could be a substrate for the efflux pump MexAB-OprM. However, the overproduction of the efflux pump increased the cefiderocol MIC only slightly, even under the condition with ferric iron in the medium, in which the function of active transport for cefiderocol is weak; this indicates that the effect of the overproduction on the activity of cefiderocol should be limited and that cefiderocol is not taken into bacterial cells faster than it is extruded from the bacterial cells by the efflux pump. On the other hand, it has been reported that BAL30072 is a substrate for the efflux pumps MexAB-OprM and MexEF-OprN (20) and that MC-1 is a substrate for the efflux pump MexAB-OprM (16). Those reports suggest that cefiderocol has different profiles of transport into P. aeruginosa with other siderophore-conjugated β-lactams. These studies are limited in clarifying and understanding the differences in the mechanisms of action of cefiderocol and other siderophore-conjugated β-lactams, and further detailed studies are required. In summary, this study showed that cefiderocol has potent in vitro activity against a broad range of aerobic Gram-negative bacteria, including MDR strains, and that the antibacterial activity of cefiderocol is based mainly on the inhibition of PBP3. This study also revealed that iron transporters such as PiuA of P. aeruginosa and CirA and Fiu of E. coli are involved in the permeation of cefiderocol into bacterial cells. The characteristics of cefiderocol indicate that cefiderocol may be a promising option for the treatment of infections caused by a broad range of Gram-negative pathogens, including MDR Enterobacteriaceae and MDR nonfermenting bacteria.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Bacterial strains.

A number of type strains were obtained from the American Type Culture Collection (Manassa, VA), the National Collection of Type Cultures (Salisbury, United Kingdom), and the National Institute of Technology and Evaluation Biological Resource Center (Tokyo, Japan). A number of clinical strains were kindly provided by the Bicêtre Hospital (Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France), Singapore General Hospital (Singapore), and GlaxoSmithKline plc (Middlesex, United Kingdom). Other test strains were obtained from various hospitals, mainly in Japan. Species-appropriate quality control (QC) strains, which were obtained from the ATCC, were used as described in Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) guidelines (21–24). Transposon (Tn) insertion mutant strains of P. aeruginosa PAO1 were kindly provided by the University of Washington (25). A PAO1 derivative of SR-L00016 was constructed from PW8599 by deletion of the pirA gene according to the method described by Alexeyev et al. and Schweizer et al. (26, 27). The PiuA expression plasmid was constructed by using an In-Fusion HD cloning kit (TaKaRa Bio, Inc., Shiga, Japan) with pMMB67HE-Gm, and PW8599 was transformed with the plasmid to obtain SR-L00252. The cirA and/or fiu deletion mutants of E. coli BW25113 were constructed according to the methods described by Datsenko et al. (28). Detailed procedures for constructing the plasmid and recombinant strains are described in the supplemental material (see Method S1). K. pneumoniae NVT2001S and its ompK35 and/or ompK36 deletion mutants were kindly provided by the National Health Research Institutes in Taiwan.

Antibiotics.

Cefiderocol, ceftolozane, and avibactam were synthesized at the research laboratories of Shionogi & Co., Ltd. (Osaka, Japan). Commercial-grade antibiotics were obtained as follows: ceftazidime, tazobactam, amikacin, and aztreonam from Chem-Impex International, Inc. (Wood Dale, IL); cefepime and metronidazole from U.S. Pharmacopeia (Rockville, MD); meropenem, colistin, and gentamicin from Wako Pure Chemical Industries, Ltd. (Osaka, Japan); and ciprofloxacin and piperacillin from LKT Laboratories, Inc. (St. Paul, MN).

MIC.

MICs were determined by using broth microdilution or agar dilution according to the CLSI (21–24), except for the MIC for Bordetella parapertussis, which was determined by the method described by Mortensen and Rodgers (29). For the determination of cefiderocol MIC, iron-depleted cation-adjusted Mueller-Hinton broth (ID-CAMHB) was prepared as previously described and used according to the recommendations of the CLSI (30), except for the cases that are required to determine MICs under specific conditions (Method S2). The quality control MIC ranges of cefiderocol approved by the CLSI were 0.06 to 0.5 μg/ml for both E. coli ATCC 25922 and P. aeruginosa ATCC 27853 (31). For anaerobic bacteria, brucella agar (Becton, Dickinson and Company, NJ) supplemented with hemin, vitamin K1, and laked sheep blood was used. For recombinant strains, test medium was supplemented with 10 μg/ml of gentamicin and/or 0.1 mM IPTG (isopropyl-β-d-thiogalactopyranoside) (Wako Pure Chemical Industries) when required.

Affinity for penicillin-binding proteins.

The affinities of cefiderocol and ceftazidime for PBPs of E. coli NHIJ JC-2, K. pneumoniae SR22291, and P. aeruginosa ATCC 27853 were determined by using benzylpenicillin [benzyl-14C]potassium (American Radiolabeled Chemicals, Inc., St. Louis, MO) as described by Spratt (32). For A. baumannii ATCC 17978, the method using Bocillin FL penicillin sodium salt (Life Technologies, Inc., Carlsbad, CA) reported by Vashist et al. (33) was used. Detailed procedures are described in the supplemental material (Method S3).

Morphological observation.

A bacterial suspension of the log-phase bacteria was smeared on compound-containing thin-layer Mueller-Hinton agar (Becton, Dickinson and Company, NJ) coated on a glass slide. After incubation at 35°C for 4 to 6 h, morphological changes of bacterial cells were observed with Leica DM2500 microscopy (Leica, Germany). Detailed procedures are described in the supplemental material (Method S4).

Time-kill study.

An overnight culture of the test strain was diluted into fresh medium to yield an inoculum of approximately 106 CFU/ml. The ID-CAMHB and CAMHB media were used for cefiderocol and ceftazidime, respectively. Concentrations of antibiotics were 0 (control), 0.25, 1, 4, or 16 times the MIC. Incubation was performed at 35°C, and the sampling times were 2, 4, and 6 h after initiation of incubation. MICs against E. coli NIHJ JC-2, K. pneumoniae SR22291, P. aeruginosa ATCC 27853, and A. baumannii ATCC 17978 were 0.25, 0.008, 0.063 and 0.016 μg/ml, respectively, for cefiderocol (ID-CAMHB) and 0.25, 0.063, 1 and 4 μg/ml, respectively, for ceftazidime (CAMHB).
  28 in total

1.  Comprehensive transposon mutant library of Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

Authors:  Michael A Jacobs; Ashley Alwood; Iyarit Thaipisuttikul; David Spencer; Eric Haugen; Stephen Ernst; Oliver Will; Rajinder Kaul; Christopher Raymond; Ruth Levy; Liu Chun-Rong; Donald Guenthner; Donald Bovee; Maynard V Olson; Colin Manoil
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-11-14       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Klebsiella pneumoniae outer membrane porins OmpK35 and OmpK36 play roles in both antimicrobial resistance and virulence.

Authors:  Yu-Kuo Tsai; Chang-Phone Fung; Jung-Chung Lin; Jiun-Han Chen; Feng-Yee Chang; Te-Li Chen; L Kristopher Siu
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2011-01-31       Impact factor: 5.191

3.  Potentiation of antibacterial activity of the MB-1 siderophore-monobactam conjugate using an efflux pump inhibitor.

Authors:  Andrew P Tomaras; Jared L Crandon; Craig J McPherson; David P Nicolau
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2015-01-20       Impact factor: 5.191

4.  Stability of Novel Siderophore Cephalosporin S-649266 against Clinically Relevant Carbapenemases.

Authors:  Tsukasa Ito-Horiyama; Yoshikazu Ishii; Akinobu Ito; Takafumi Sato; Rio Nakamura; Norio Fukuhara; Masakatsu Tsuji; Yoshinori Yamano; Keizo Yamaguchi; Kazuhiro Tateda
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2016-06-20       Impact factor: 5.191

5.  Activity of cefiderocol (S-649266) against carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacteria collected from inpatients in Greek hospitals.

Authors:  Matthew E Falagas; Tilemachos Skalidis; Konstantinos Z Vardakas; Nicholas J Legakis
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  2017-06-01       Impact factor: 5.790

6.  Properties of the penicillin-binding proteins of Escherichia coli K12,.

Authors:  B G Spratt
Journal:  Eur J Biochem       Date:  1977-01

7.  Improved antibiotic-resistance gene cassettes and omega elements for Escherichia coli vector construction and in vitro deletion/insertion mutagenesis.

Authors:  M F Alexeyev; I N Shokolenko; T P Croughan
Journal:  Gene       Date:  1995-07-04       Impact factor: 3.688

8.  Analysis of penicillin-binding proteins (PBPs) in carbapenem resistant Acinetobacter baumannii.

Authors:  Jitendra Vashist; Vishvanath Tiwari; Rituparna Das; Arti Kapil; Moganty R Rajeswari
Journal:  Indian J Med Res       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 2.375

9.  Siderophore Cephalosporin Cefiderocol Utilizes Ferric Iron Transporter Systems for Antibacterial Activity against Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

Authors:  Akinobu Ito; Toru Nishikawa; Shuhei Matsumoto; Hidenori Yoshizawa; Takafumi Sato; Rio Nakamura; Masakatsu Tsuji; Yoshinori Yamano
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2016-11-21       Impact factor: 5.191

10.  In Vitro Activity of the Siderophore Cephalosporin, Cefiderocol, against a Recent Collection of Clinically Relevant Gram-Negative Bacilli from North America and Europe, Including Carbapenem-Nonsusceptible Isolates (SIDERO-WT-2014 Study).

Authors:  Meredith A Hackel; Masakatsu Tsuji; Yoshinori Yamano; Roger Echols; James A Karlowsky; Daniel F Sahm
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2017-08-24       Impact factor: 5.191

View more
  75 in total

1.  Long-Term Compassionate Use of Cefiderocol To Treat Chronic Osteomyelitis Caused by Extensively Drug-Resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Extended-Spectrum-β-Lactamase-Producing Klebsiella pneumoniae in a Pediatric Patient.

Authors:  Zain I Alamarat; Jessica Babic; Truc T Tran; Susan H Wootton; An Q Dinh; William R Miller; Blake Hanson; Audrey Wanger; Joshua L Gary; Cesar A Arias; Norma Pérez
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2020-03-24       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 2.  Cefiderocol: A Siderophore Cephalosporin with Activity Against Carbapenem-Resistant and Multidrug-Resistant Gram-Negative Bacilli.

Authors:  George G Zhanel; Alyssa R Golden; Sheryl Zelenitsky; Karyn Wiebe; Courtney K Lawrence; Heather J Adam; Temilolu Idowu; Ronald Domalaon; Frank Schweizer; Michael A Zhanel; Philippe R S Lagacé-Wiens; Andrew J Walkty; Ayman Noreddin; Joseph P Lynch Iii; James A Karlowsky
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2019-02       Impact factor: 9.546

3.  Burkholderia pseudomallei Clinical Isolates Are Highly Susceptible In Vitro to Cefiderocol, a Siderophore Cephalosporin.

Authors:  Delaney Burnard; Gemma Robertson; Andrew Henderson; Caitlin Falconer; Michelle J Bauer; Kyra Cottrell; Ian Gassiep; Robert Norton; David L Paterson; Patrick N A Harris
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2021-01-20       Impact factor: 5.191

4.  [New antibiotics for severe infections due to multidrug-resistant pathogens : Definitive treatment and escalation].

Authors:  D C Richter; T Brenner; A Brinkmann; B Grabein; M Hochreiter; A Heininger; D Störzinger; J Briegel; M Pletz; M A Weigand; C Lichtenstern
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 1.041

Review 5.  Multidrug-Resistant Pseudomonas Infections: Hard to Treat, But Hope on the Horizon?

Authors:  Lynn Nguyen; Joshua Garcia; Katherine Gruenberg; Conan MacDougall
Journal:  Curr Infect Dis Rep       Date:  2018-06-06       Impact factor: 3.725

Review 6.  New Treatment Options against Carbapenem-Resistant Acinetobacter baumannii Infections.

Authors:  Burcu Isler; Yohei Doi; Robert A Bonomo; David L Paterson
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2018-12-21       Impact factor: 5.191

7.  ARGONAUT-I: Activity of Cefiderocol (S-649266), a Siderophore Cephalosporin, against Gram-Negative Bacteria, Including Carbapenem-Resistant Nonfermenters and Enterobacteriaceae with Defined Extended-Spectrum β-Lactamases and Carbapenemases.

Authors:  Michael R Jacobs; Ayman M Abdelhamed; Caryn E Good; Daniel D Rhoads; Kristine M Hujer; Andrea M Hujer; T Nicholas Domitrovic; Susan D Rudin; Sandra S Richter; David van Duin; Barry N Kreiswirth; Chris Greco; Derrick E Fouts; Robert A Bonomo
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2018-12-21       Impact factor: 5.191

8.  Comparative In Vivo Antibacterial Activity of Human-Simulated Exposures of Cefiderocol and Ceftazidime against Stenotrophomonas maltophilia in the Murine Thigh Model.

Authors:  Iris H Chen; James M Kidd; Kamilia Abdelraouf; David P Nicolau
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2019-10-07       Impact factor: 5.191

9.  Cefiderocol Resistance in Acinetobacter baumannii: Roles of β-Lactamases, Siderophore Receptors, and Penicillin Binding Protein 3.

Authors:  Saquib Malik; Monica Kaminski; David Landman; John Quale
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2020-10-20       Impact factor: 5.191

10.  Evaluation of the Xpert Carba-R NxG Assay for Detection of Carbapenemase Genes in a Global Challenge Set of Pseudomonas aeruginosa Isolates.

Authors:  Christian M Gill; Tomefa E Asempa; Isabella A Tickler; Caitlin Dela Cruz; Fred C Tenover; David P Nicolau
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2020-11-18       Impact factor: 5.948

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.