Lynn Nguyen1, Joshua Garcia2, Katherine Gruenberg1, Conan MacDougall3. 1. Department of Clinical Pharmacy, University of California San Francisco School of Pharmacy, 533 Parnassus Ave, U-585, Box 0622, San Francisco, CA, 94143-0622, USA. 2. Department of Pharmacy Practice, Marshall B. Ketchum University College of Pharmacy, Fullerton, CA, USA. 3. Department of Clinical Pharmacy, University of California San Francisco School of Pharmacy, 533 Parnassus Ave, U-585, Box 0622, San Francisco, CA, 94143-0622, USA. conan.macdougall@ucsf.edu.
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: As the sixth most common nosocomial pathogen in the USA, Pseudomonas aeruginosa poses a significant threat to patients within the healthcare system. Its intrinsic and acquired resistance mechanisms also significantly limit the choices for antimicrobial therapy, prompting an increase in the research and development of antibacterial agents with enhanced activity against multidrug-resistant (MDR) P. aeruginosa. While many approved and pipeline antibiotics have activity against wild-type P. aeruginosa, only four new antibiotics have promising activity against MDR P. aeruginosa: ceftazidime-avibactam (Avycaz®), ceftolozane-tazobactam (Zerbaxa®), cefiderocol, and imipenem-cilastatin/relebactam. The goal of this paper is to review the epidemiology and mechanisms of resistance in P. aeruginosa as well as explore the newly approved and pipeline agents that overcome these mechanisms of resistance. RECENT FINDINGS: Ceftazidime-avibactam and ceftolozane-tazobactam are currently FDA-approved and available for use, while cefiderocol and imipenem-cilastatin/relebactam are in development. Current evidence suggests ceftazidime-avibactam and ceftolozane-tazobactam both may have a role in treatment of MDR P. aeruginosa infections. Ceftolozane-tazobactam appears to be modestly more potent against P. aeruginosa, but emergence of resistance has been noted in various reported cases. Trials are ongoing for cefiderocol and imipenem-cilastatin/relebactam and early results appear promising. The aforementioned agents fill important gaps in the antibiotic armamentarium, particularly for patients with MDR P. aeruginosa infections who otherwise have extremely limited and often toxic antibiotic options. However, resistance to all of these agents will likely emerge, and additional antibiotic development is warranted to provide sufficient options to successfully manage MDR P. aeruginosa infections.
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: As the sixth most common nosocomial pathogen in the USA, Pseudomonas aeruginosa poses a significant threat to patients within the healthcare system. Its intrinsic and acquired resistance mechanisms also significantly limit the choices for antimicrobial therapy, prompting an increase in the research and development of antibacterial agents with enhanced activity against multidrug-resistant (MDR) P. aeruginosa. While many approved and pipeline antibiotics have activity against wild-type P. aeruginosa, only four new antibiotics have promising activity against MDR P. aeruginosa: ceftazidime-avibactam (Avycaz®), ceftolozane-tazobactam (Zerbaxa®), cefiderocol, and imipenem-cilastatin/relebactam. The goal of this paper is to review the epidemiology and mechanisms of resistance in P. aeruginosa as well as explore the newly approved and pipeline agents that overcome these mechanisms of resistance. RECENT FINDINGS:Ceftazidime-avibactam and ceftolozane-tazobactam are currently FDA-approved and available for use, while cefiderocol and imipenem-cilastatin/relebactam are in development. Current evidence suggests ceftazidime-avibactam and ceftolozane-tazobactam both may have a role in treatment of MDR P. aeruginosa infections. Ceftolozane-tazobactam appears to be modestly more potent against P. aeruginosa, but emergence of resistance has been noted in various reported cases. Trials are ongoing for cefiderocol and imipenem-cilastatin/relebactam and early results appear promising. The aforementioned agents fill important gaps in the antibiotic armamentarium, particularly for patients with MDR P. aeruginosa infections who otherwise have extremely limited and often toxic antibiotic options. However, resistance to all of these agents will likely emerge, and additional antibiotic development is warranted to provide sufficient options to successfully manage MDR P. aeruginosa infections.
Authors: Sibylle H Lob; Meredith A Hackel; Krystyna M Kazmierczak; Katherine Young; Mary R Motyl; James A Karlowsky; Daniel F Sahm Journal: Antimicrob Agents Chemother Date: 2017-05-24 Impact factor: 5.191
Authors: Matthew Sims; Valeri Mariyanovski; Patrick McLeroth; Wayne Akers; Yu-Chieh Lee; Michelle L Brown; Jiejun Du; Alison Pedley; Nicholas A Kartsonis; Amanda Paschke Journal: J Antimicrob Chemother Date: 2017-09-01 Impact factor: 5.790
Authors: Meredith A Hackel; Masakatsu Tsuji; Yoshinori Yamano; Roger Echols; James A Karlowsky; Daniel F Sahm Journal: Antimicrob Agents Chemother Date: 2017-08-24 Impact factor: 5.191
Authors: Hayley R Nordstrom; Daniel R Evans; Amanda G Finney; Kevin J Westbrook; Paula F Zamora; Casey E Hofstaedter; Mohamed H Yassin; Akansha Pradhan; Alina Iovleva; Robert K Ernst; Jennifer M Bomberger; Ryan K Shields; Yohei Doi; Daria Van Tyne Journal: iScience Date: 2022-05-10
Authors: David A Dik; Chinedu S Madukoma; Shusuke Tomoshige; Choonkeun Kim; Elena Lastochkin; William C Boggess; Jed F Fisher; Joshua D Shrout; Shahriar Mobashery Journal: ACS Chem Biol Date: 2019-01-18 Impact factor: 5.100
Authors: S R Lotlikar; E Gallaway; T Grant; S Popis; M Whited; M Guragain; R Rogers; S Hamilton; N G Gerasimchuk; M A Patrauchan Journal: Polymers (Basel) Date: 2019-06-09 Impact factor: 4.329
Authors: Daniela Loconsole; Marisa Accogli; Monica Monaco; Maria Del Grosso; Anna Lisa De Robertis; Anna Morea; Loredana Capozzi; Laura Del Sambro; Annarosa Simone; Vincenzo De Letteriis; Michele Quarto; Antonio Parisi; Maria Chironna Journal: Antimicrob Resist Infect Control Date: 2020-05-25 Impact factor: 4.887