Claudia A Sevillano1,2, Jeremie Vandenplas3, John W M Bastiaansen3, Rob Bergsma4, Mario P L Calus3. 1. Wageningen University & Research Animal Breeding and Genomics, 6700 AH, Wageningen, The Netherlands. claudia.sevillanodelaguila@wur.nl. 2. Topigs Norsvin Research Center, 6640 AA, Beuningen, The Netherlands. claudia.sevillanodelaguila@wur.nl. 3. Wageningen University & Research Animal Breeding and Genomics, 6700 AH, Wageningen, The Netherlands. 4. Topigs Norsvin Research Center, 6640 AA, Beuningen, The Netherlands.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Genomic prediction of purebred animals for crossbred performance can be based on a model that estimates effects of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in purebreds on crossbred performance. For crossbred performance, SNP effects might be breed-specific due to differences between breeds in allele frequencies and linkage disequilibrium patterns between SNPs and quantitative trait loci. Accurately tracing the breed-of-origin of alleles (BOA) in three-way crosses is possible with a recently developed procedure called BOA. A model that accounts for breed-specific SNP effects (BOA model), has never been tested empirically on a three-way crossbreeding scheme. Therefore, the objectives of this study were to evaluate the estimates of variance components and the predictive accuracy of the BOA model compared to models in which SNP effects for crossbred performance were assumed to be the same across breeds, using either breed-specific allele frequencies ([Formula: see text] model) or allele frequencies averaged across breeds ([Formula: see text] model). In this study, we used data from purebred and three-way crossbred pigs on average daily gain (ADG), back fat thickness (BF), and loin depth (LD). RESULTS: Estimates of variance components for crossbred performance from the BOA model were mostly similar to estimates from models [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text]. Heritabilities for crossbred performance ranged from 0.24 to 0.46 between traits. Genetic correlations between purebred and crossbred performance ([Formula: see text]) across breeds ranged from 0.30 to 0.62 for ADG and from 0.53 to 0.74 for BF and LD. For ADG, prediction accuracies of the BOA model were higher than those of the [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text] models, with significantly higher accuracies only for one maternal breed. For BF and LD, prediction accuracies of models [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text] were higher than those of the BOA model, with no significant differences. Across all traits, models [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text] yielded similar predictions. CONCLUSIONS: The BOA model yielded a higher prediction accuracy for ADG in one maternal breed, which had the lowest [Formula: see text] (0.30). Using the BOA model was especially relevant for traits with a low [Formula: see text]. In all other cases, the use of crossbred information in models [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text], does not jeopardize predictions and these models are more easily implemented than the BOA model.
BACKGROUND: Genomic prediction of purebred animals for crossbred performance can be based on a model that estimates effects of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in purebreds on crossbred performance. For crossbred performance, SNP effects might be breed-specific due to differences between breeds in allele frequencies and linkage disequilibrium patterns between SNPs and quantitative trait loci. Accurately tracing the breed-of-origin of alleles (BOA) in three-way crosses is possible with a recently developed procedure called BOA. A model that accounts for breed-specific SNP effects (BOA model), has never been tested empirically on a three-way crossbreeding scheme. Therefore, the objectives of this study were to evaluate the estimates of variance components and the predictive accuracy of the BOA model compared to models in which SNP effects for crossbred performance were assumed to be the same across breeds, using either breed-specific allele frequencies ([Formula: see text] model) or allele frequencies averaged across breeds ([Formula: see text] model). In this study, we used data from purebred and three-way crossbred pigs on average daily gain (ADG), back fat thickness (BF), and loin depth (LD). RESULTS: Estimates of variance components for crossbred performance from the BOA model were mostly similar to estimates from models [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text]. Heritabilities for crossbred performance ranged from 0.24 to 0.46 between traits. Genetic correlations between purebred and crossbred performance ([Formula: see text]) across breeds ranged from 0.30 to 0.62 for ADG and from 0.53 to 0.74 for BF and LD. For ADG, prediction accuracies of the BOA model were higher than those of the [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text] models, with significantly higher accuracies only for one maternal breed. For BF and LD, prediction accuracies of models [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text] were higher than those of the BOA model, with no significant differences. Across all traits, models [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text] yielded similar predictions. CONCLUSIONS: The BOA model yielded a higher prediction accuracy for ADG in one maternal breed, which had the lowest [Formula: see text] (0.30). Using the BOA model was especially relevant for traits with a low [Formula: see text]. In all other cases, the use of crossbred information in models [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text], does not jeopardize predictions and these models are more easily implemented than the BOA model.
Authors: Marcos S Lopes; Henk Bovenhuis; André M Hidalgo; Johan A M van Arendonk; Egbert F Knol; John W M Bastiaansen Journal: Genet Sel Evol Date: 2017-06-26 Impact factor: 4.297
Authors: Mario P L Calus; Jérémie Vandenplas; Ina Hulsegge; Randy Borg; John M Henshall; Rachel Hawken Journal: Poult Sci Date: 2019-12-01 Impact factor: 3.352
Authors: Claudia A Sevillano; Jeremie Vandenplas; John W M Bastiaansen; Rob Bergsma; Mario P L Calus Journal: Genet Sel Evol Date: 2017-12-27 Impact factor: 4.297
Authors: Claudia A Sevillano; Jan Ten Napel; Simone E F Guimarães; Fabyano F Silva; Mario P L Calus Journal: BMC Genomics Date: 2018-10-11 Impact factor: 3.969