Literature DB >> 33325519

Genetic parameters and purebred-crossbred genetic correlations for growth, meat quality, and carcass traits in pigs.

Hadi Esfandyari1, Dinesh Thekkoot2, Robert Kemp3, Graham Plastow2, Jack Dekkers1.   

Abstract

Growth, meat quality, and carcass traits are of economic importance in swine breeding. Understanding their genetic basis in purebred (PB) and commercial crossbred (CB) pigs is necessary for a successful breeding program because, although the breeding goal is to improve CB performance, phenotype collection and selection are usually carried out in PB populations housed in biosecure nucleus herds. Thus, the selection is indirect, and the accuracy of selection depends on the genetic correlation between PB and CB performance (rpc). The objectives of this study were to 1) estimate genetic parameters for growth, meat quality, and carcass traits in a PB sire line and related commercial CB pigs and 2) estimate the corresponding genetic correlations between purebred and crossbred performance (rpc). Both objectives were investigated by using pedigree information only (PBLUP) and by combining pedigree and genomic information in a single-step genomic BLUP (ssGBLUP) procedure. Growth rate showed moderate estimates of heritability for both PB and CB based on PBLUP, while estimates were higher in CB based on ssGBLUP. Heritability estimates for meat quality traits were diverse and slightly different based on PB and CB data with both methods. Carcass traits had higher heritability estimates based on PB compared with CB data based on PBLUP and slightly higher estimates for CB data based on ssGBLUP. A wide range of estimates of genetic correlations were obtained among traits within the PB and CB data. In the PB population, estimates of heritabilities and genetic correlations were similar based on PBLUP and ssGBLUP for all traits, while based on the CB data, ssGBLUP resulted in different estimates of genetic parameters with lower SEs. With some exceptions, estimates of rpc were moderate to high. The SE on the rpc estimates was generally large when based on PBLUP due to limited sample size, especially for CBs. In contrast, estimates of rpc based on ssGBLUP were not only more precise but also more consistent among pairs of traits, considering their genetic correlations within the PB and CB data. The wide range of estimates of rpc (less than 0.70 for 7 out of 13 traits) indicates that the use of CB phenotypes recorded on commercial farms, along with genomic information, for selection in the PB population has potential to increase the genetic progress of CB performance.
© The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Society of Animal Science. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  crossbred and purebred pigs; genetic parameters; genomic information

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33325519      PMCID: PMC7755176          DOI: 10.1093/jas/skaa379

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Sci        ISSN: 0021-8812            Impact factor:   3.159


  41 in total

1.  Genetic parameter estimates from joint evaluation of purebreds and crossbreds in swine using the crossbred model.

Authors:  E Lutaaya; I Misztal; J W Mabry; T Short; H H Timm; R Holzbauer
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 3.159

2.  Marbling effects on quality characteristics of pork loin chops: consumer purchase intent, visual and sensory characteristics.

Authors:  M S Brewer; L G Zhu; F K McKeith
Journal:  Meat Sci       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 5.209

3.  The impact of genetic relationship information on genome-assisted breeding values.

Authors:  D Habier; R L Fernando; J C M Dekkers
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  Improving genetic evaluation of litter size and piglet mortality for both genotyped and nongenotyped individuals using a single-step method.

Authors:  X Guo; O F Christensen; T Ostersen; Y Wang; M S Lund; G Su
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 3.159

5.  Variation in actual relationship as a consequence of Mendelian sampling and linkage.

Authors:  W G Hill; B S Weir
Journal:  Genet Res (Camb)       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 1.588

6.  Variance components and heritabilities for sow productivity traits estimated from purebred versus crossbred sows.

Authors:  M J Ehlers; J W Mabry; J K Bertrand; K J Stalder
Journal:  J Anim Breed Genet       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 2.380

7.  Genetic parameter estimates of meat quality traits in Duroc pigs selected for average daily gain, longissimus muscle area, backfat thickness, and intramuscular fat content.

Authors:  K Suzuki; M Irie; H Kadowaki; T Shibata; M Kumagai; A Nishida
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 3.159

8.  Genetic analyses of growth, real-time ultrasound, carcass, and pork quality traits in Duroc and Landrace pigs: II. Heritabilities and correlations.

Authors:  L L Lo; D G McLaren; F K McKeith; R L Fernando; J Novakofski
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  1992-08       Impact factor: 3.159

9.  Different genomic relationship matrices for single-step analysis using phenotypic, pedigree and genomic information.

Authors:  Selma Forni; Ignacio Aguilar; Ignacy Misztal
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2011-01-05       Impact factor: 4.297

10.  Design of reference populations for genomic selection in crossbreeding programs.

Authors:  Ilse E M van Grevenhof; Julius H J van der Werf
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2015-03-07       Impact factor: 4.297

View more
  1 in total

1.  Genotyping and phenotyping strategies for genetic improvement of meat quality and carcass composition in swine.

Authors:  Emmanuel André Lozada-Soto; Daniela Lourenco; Christian Maltecca; Justin Fix; Clint Schwab; Caleb Shull; Francesco Tiezzi
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2022-06-07       Impact factor: 5.100

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.