Literature DB >> 32812028

Smokers' Exposure to Perceived Modified Risk Claims for E-Cigarettes, Snus, and Smokeless Tobacco in the United States.

Olivia A Wackowski1, Richard J O'Connor2, Jennifer L Pearson3.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Based on arguments for harm reduction and health benefits, tobacco companies in the United States can apply for regulatory authorization to make "modified risk tobacco product" (MRTP) marketing claims. The impact of future MRTP claims may depend on whether they are noticed, believed, and lead to smokers switching products. This study provides baseline data about smokers' exposure to perceived MRTP claims ahead of any MRTP authorizations. AIMS AND METHODS: We analyzed measures from Wave 3 of the US-based Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health (PATH) study which asked smokers to indicate if they had seen any e-cigarettes, snus, or other smokeless tobacco (SLT) products that claim to be "less harmful" in the past 12 months, and their likelihood of using products with these claims in the next 30 days.
RESULTS: Significantly fewer smokers noted having seen snus (5.1%) or other SLT (5.6%) with "less harmful" claims compared with e-cigarettes (29.1%). For each product, the prevalence of MRTP claim exposure was higher among smokers who perceived the product to be less harmful than smoking, who currently used the product, and who had higher rates of tobacco advertising exposure at the point of sale. Among smokers who noticed products with "less harmful" claims, about one-quarter said they would use them in the future (24%-27%).
CONCLUSIONS: Ahead of any Food & Drug Administration (FDA) authorization for MRTP claims, some smokers already perceive exposure to "less harmful" claims for e-cigarettes, but few do for SLT. MRTP claims may motivate some smokers to use these products. IMPLICATIONS: This study provides new baseline data about smokers' perceived exposure to MRTP claims in the United States ahead of any regulatory claim authorization. Using data from Wave 3 of the US PATH study, we found that some smokers already perceive exposure to "less harmful" claims for e-cigarettes (29%), but few do for SLT (5%-6%). Among smokers who noticed products with "less harmful" claims, about one-quarter said they would use them in the future (24%-27%), suggesting MRTP claims may motivate some smokers to use products described as "less harmful."
© The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 32812028      PMCID: PMC7885787          DOI: 10.1093/ntr/ntaa159

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res        ISSN: 1462-2203            Impact factor:   4.244


  16 in total

1.  U.S. adult perceptions of the harmfulness of tobacco products: descriptive findings from the 2013-14 baseline wave 1 of the path study.

Authors:  Geoffrey T Fong; Tara Elton-Marshall; Pete Driezen; Annette R Kaufman; K Michael Cummings; Kelvin Choi; Jonathan Kwan; Amber Koblitz; Andrew Hyland; Maansi Bansal-Travers; Charles Carusi; Mary E Thompson
Journal:  Addict Behav       Date:  2018-11-17       Impact factor: 3.913

2.  Smokers' perceptions of risks and harm from snus relative to cigarettes: A latent profile analysis study.

Authors:  Olivia A Wackowski; Anne E Ray; Jerod L Stapleton
Journal:  Addict Behav       Date:  2018-11-14       Impact factor: 3.913

3.  The relative risks of a low-nitrosamine smokeless tobacco product compared with smoking cigarettes: estimates of a panel of experts.

Authors:  David T Levy; Elizabeth A Mumford; K Michael Cummings; Elizabeth A Gilpin; Gary Giovino; Andrew Hyland; David Sweanor; Kenneth E Warner
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 4.254

4.  Adult interest in using a hypothetical modified risk tobacco product: findings from wave 1 of the Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health Study (2013-14).

Authors:  Jennifer L Pearson; Amanda L Johnson; Sarah E Johnson; Cassandra A Stanton; Andrea C Villanti; Raymond S Niaura; Allison M Glasser; Baoguang Wang; David B Abrams; K Michael Cummings; Andrew Hyland
Journal:  Addiction       Date:  2017-09-06       Impact factor: 6.526

5.  A content analysis of smokeless tobacco coverage in U.S. newspapers and news wires.

Authors:  Olivia A Wackowski; M Jane Lewis; Cristine D Delnevo; Pamela M Ling
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2013-01-03       Impact factor: 4.244

6.  Managing nicotine without smoke to save lives now: Evidence for harm minimization.

Authors:  David B Abrams; Allison M Glasser; Andrea C Villanti; Jennifer L Pearson; Shyanika Rose; Raymond S Niaura
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2018-06-23       Impact factor: 4.018

7.  A Nicotine-Focused Framework for Public Health.

Authors:  Scott Gottlieb; Mitchell Zeller
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2017-08-16       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  Design and methods of the Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health (PATH) Study.

Authors:  Andrew Hyland; Bridget K Ambrose; Kevin P Conway; Nicolette Borek; Elizabeth Lambert; Charles Carusi; Kristie Taylor; Scott Crosse; Geoffrey T Fong; K Michael Cummings; David Abrams; John P Pierce; James Sargent; Karen Messer; Maansi Bansal-Travers; Ray Niaura; Donna Vallone; David Hammond; Nahla Hilmi; Jonathan Kwan; Andrea Piesse; Graham Kalton; Sharon Lohr; Nick Pharris-Ciurej; Victoria Castleman; Victoria R Green; Greta Tessman; Annette Kaufman; Charles Lawrence; Dana M van Bemmel; Heather L Kimmel; Ben Blount; Ling Yang; Barbara O'Brien; Cindy Tworek; Derek Alberding; Lynn C Hull; Yu-Ching Cheng; David Maklan; Cathy L Backinger; Wilson M Compton
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2016-08-08       Impact factor: 7.552

9.  Estimating the harms of nicotine-containing products using the MCDA approach.

Authors:  David J Nutt; Lawrence D Phillips; David Balfour; H Valerie Curran; Martin Dockrell; Jonathan Foulds; Karl Fagerstrom; Kgosi Letlape; Anders Milton; Riccardo Polosa; John Ramsey; David Sweanor
Journal:  Eur Addict Res       Date:  2014-04-03       Impact factor: 3.015

10.  Comparison of Nicotine and Toxicant Exposure in Users of Electronic Cigarettes and Combustible Cigarettes.

Authors:  Maciej L Goniewicz; Danielle M Smith; Kathryn C Edwards; Benjamin C Blount; Kathleen L Caldwell; Jun Feng; Lanqing Wang; Carol Christensen; Bridget Ambrose; Nicolette Borek; Dana van Bemmel; Karen Konkel; Gladys Erives; Cassandra A Stanton; Elizabeth Lambert; Heather L Kimmel; Dorothy Hatsukami; Stephen S Hecht; Raymond S Niaura; Mark Travers; Charles Lawrence; Andrew J Hyland
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2018-12-07
View more
  3 in total

1.  Exposure to e-cigarette health claims and association with e-cigarette use and risk perceptions: A cohort study of young adults.

Authors:  Kimberly G Wagoner; Beth A Reboussin; Jennifer Cornacchione Ross; Rachel Denlinger-Apte; John Spangler; Erin L Sutfin
Journal:  Addict Behav       Date:  2022-05-07       Impact factor: 4.591

2.  Effect of a hypothetical modified risk tobacco product claim on heated tobacco product use intention and perceptions in young adults.

Authors:  Julia C Chen-Sankey; Afton Kechter; Jessica Barrington-Trimis; Rob McConnell; Evan A Krueger; Tess Boley Cruz; Jennifer B Unger; Benjamin W Chaffee; Adam Leventhal
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2021-05-31       Impact factor: 6.953

3.  Smokers' and Young Adult Non-Smokers' Perceptions and Perceived Impact of Snus and E-Cigarette Modified Risk Messages.

Authors:  Olivia A Wackowski; Mariam Rashid; Kathryn L Greene; M Jane Lewis; Richard J O'Connor
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-09-18       Impact factor: 3.390

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.