Literature DB >> 29059330

Sex Differences in Subjective Responses To Moderate Versus Very Low Nicotine Content Cigarettes.

Kenneth A Perkins1, Joshua L Karelitz1, Nicole Kunkle1.   

Abstract

Introduction: Men and women may be differentially sensitive to the acute perceptual responses to smoking cigarettes that vary in nicotine content ("dose") but are matched on non-nicotine constituents.
Methods: Dependent adult smokers (43 M, 31 F) took four controlled puffs from Spectrum research cigarettes that were moderate (16-17 mg/g) or very low (0.4 mg/g) in nicotine content, and matched on "tar." To ensure reliable responses, each cigarette was administered singly five times in random order under blind conditions, with one or the other provided every 15 minutes over a 2.5-hour session following overnight abstinence. Subjective perceptions (eg, "satisfying", "how much nicotine") were rated after each cigarette.
Results: Subjective ratings differed due to cigarette nicotine content, as expected, and did so differentially between men and women. The interaction of nicotine content by sex was significant for most rated subjective perceptions of the cigarette, as multivariate analyses showed that differences due to nicotine content were highly significant for men (p < .001) but only marginal for women (p = .08). Conclusions: Relative to men, women's subjective responses to acute smoking are less sensitive to differences in cigarette nicotine content. To our knowledge, this is the first comparison of sex differences in response to very carefully controlled doses of smoked nicotine per se. Further research should examine possible sex differences in nicotine dosing administered by other smoked and nonsmoked methods, as well as the developmental pattern of these differences during onset and during cessation of dependent smoking. Implications: Subjective perceptions of smoking cigarettes varying in nicotine contents differ between men and women. These results with research cigarettes are similar to other studies with carefully dosed nicotine administration by other means, supporting the notion that women, relative to men, are less sensitive to pharmacological factors and more sensitive to nonpharmacological factors in acute cigarette smoking. Future studies are warranted to examine sex differences in other responses to controlled nicotine intake via smoking, and via other smoked and nonsmoked methods of administering nicotine doses.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29059330      PMCID: PMC6121913          DOI: 10.1093/ntr/ntx205

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res        ISSN: 1462-2203            Impact factor:   4.244


  44 in total

1.  Biochemical verification of tobacco use and cessation.

Authors: 
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 4.244

2.  Sex differences in the contribution of nicotine and nonpharmacological stimuli to nicotine self-administration in rats.

Authors:  Nadia Chaudhri; Anthony R Caggiula; Eric C Donny; Sheri Booth; Maysa A Gharib; Laure A Craven; Shannon S Allen; Alan F Sved; Kenneth A Perkins
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2005-01-29       Impact factor: 4.530

3.  Reinforcing effects of nicotine and non-nicotine components of cigarette smoke.

Authors:  Jed E Rose; Al Salley; Frederique M Behm; James E Bates; Eric C Westman
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2010-04-01       Impact factor: 4.530

4.  Estimating tar and nicotine exposure: human smoking versus machine generated smoke yields.

Authors:  F K St Charles; A A Kabbani; M F Borgerding
Journal:  Regul Toxicol Pharmacol       Date:  2009-08-31       Impact factor: 3.271

Review 5.  Does nicotine do what we think it does? A meta-analytic review of the subjective effects of nicotine in nasal spray and intravenous studies with smokers and nonsmokers.

Authors:  David Kalman; Stevens S Smith
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 4.244

Review 6.  Sex differences in nicotine effects and self-administration: review of human and animal evidence.

Authors:  K A Perkins; E Donny; A R Caggiula
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 4.244

7.  Smokers' sex and the effects of tobacco cigarettes: subject-rated and physiological measures.

Authors:  T Eissenberg; C Adams; E C Riggins; M Likness
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 4.244

8.  Female sex and oral contraceptive use accelerate nicotine metabolism.

Authors:  Neal L Benowitz; Christina N Lessov-Schlaggar; Gary E Swan; Peyton Jacob
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 6.875

Review 9.  Nicotine discrimination in men and women.

Authors:  K A Perkins
Journal:  Pharmacol Biochem Behav       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 3.533

10.  Sex differences in acute relief of abstinence-induced withdrawal and negative affect due to nicotine content in cigarettes.

Authors:  Kenneth A Perkins; Joshua L Karelitz
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 4.244

View more
  9 in total

1.  Menthol blunts the interoceptive discriminative stimulus effects of nicotine in female but not male rats.

Authors:  Y Wendy Huynh; Anthony Raimondi; Andrew Finkner; Jordan D Kuck; Carly Selleck; Rick A Bevins
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2020-05-24       Impact factor: 4.530

2.  Evaluating the utility of the modified cigarette evaluation questionnaire and cigarette purchase task for predicting acute relative reinforcing efficacy of cigarettes varying in nicotine content.

Authors:  Cecilia L Bergeria; Sarah H Heil; Danielle R Davis; Joanna M Streck; Stacey C Sigmon; Janice Y Bunn; Jennifer W Tidey; Chris A Arger; Derek D Reed; Thomas Gallagher; John R Hughes; Diann E Gaalema; Maxine L Stitzer; Stephen T Higgins
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2019-02-13       Impact factor: 4.492

Review 3.  Role of Exogenous Progesterone in the Treatment of Men and Women with Substance Use Disorders: A Narrative Review.

Authors:  MacKenzie R Peltier; Mehmet Sofuoglu
Journal:  CNS Drugs       Date:  2018-05       Impact factor: 5.749

4.  A Procedure to Standardize Puff Topography During Evaluations of Acute Tobacco or Electronic Cigarette Exposure.

Authors:  Kenneth A Perkins; Joshua L Karelitz
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2020-04-21       Impact factor: 4.244

5.  Potential Moderating Effects of Sex/Gender on the Acute Relative Reinforcing and Subjective Effects of Reduced Nicotine Content Cigarettes in Vulnerable Populations.

Authors:  Joanna M Streck; Danielle R Davis; Raina D Pang; Stacey C Sigmon; Janice Y Bunn; Cecilia L Bergeria; Jennifer W Tidey; Sarah H Heil; Diann E Gaalema; John R Hughes; Maxine L Stitzer; Ellaina Reed; Stephen T Higgins
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2020-05-26       Impact factor: 4.244

6.  Association of Reduced Nicotine Content Cigarettes With Smoking Behaviors and Biomarkers of Exposure Among Slow and Fast Nicotine Metabolizers: A Nonrandomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Melissa Mercincavage; Kirsten Lochbuehler; E Paul Wileyto; Neal L Benowitz; Rachel F Tyndale; Caryn Lerman; Andrew A Strasser
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2018-08-24

7.  Nicotine Reduction in Cigarettes: Literature Review and Gap Analysis.

Authors:  Micah L Berman; Allison M Glasser
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2019-12-23       Impact factor: 4.244

8.  Effects of Cigarette Nicotine Content and Menthol Preference on Perceived Health Risks, Subjective Ratings, and Carbon Monoxide Exposure Among Adolescent Smokers.

Authors:  Rachel L Denlinger-Apte; Rachel N Cassidy; Suzanne M Colby; Alexander W Sokolovsky; Jennifer W Tidey
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2019-12-23       Impact factor: 4.244

9.  The Impact of Gradual and Immediate Nicotine Reduction on Subjective Cigarette Ratings.

Authors:  Tracy T Smith; Eric C Donny; Xianghua Luo; Alicia M Allen; Dana M Carroll; Rachel L Denlinger-Apte; Sarah S Dermody; Joseph S Koopmeiners; F Joseph McClernon; Lauren R Pacek; Ryan Vandrey; Dorothy K Hatsukami
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2019-12-23       Impact factor: 4.244

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.