Introduction: Men and women may be differentially sensitive to the acute perceptual responses to smoking cigarettes that vary in nicotine content ("dose") but are matched on non-nicotine constituents. Methods: Dependent adult smokers (43 M, 31 F) took four controlled puffs from Spectrum research cigarettes that were moderate (16-17 mg/g) or very low (0.4 mg/g) in nicotine content, and matched on "tar." To ensure reliable responses, each cigarette was administered singly five times in random order under blind conditions, with one or the other provided every 15 minutes over a 2.5-hour session following overnight abstinence. Subjective perceptions (eg, "satisfying", "how much nicotine") were rated after each cigarette. Results: Subjective ratings differed due to cigarette nicotine content, as expected, and did so differentially between men and women. The interaction of nicotine content by sex was significant for most rated subjective perceptions of the cigarette, as multivariate analyses showed that differences due to nicotine content were highly significant for men (p < .001) but only marginal for women (p = .08). Conclusions: Relative to men, women's subjective responses to acute smoking are less sensitive to differences in cigarette nicotine content. To our knowledge, this is the first comparison of sex differences in response to very carefully controlled doses of smoked nicotine per se. Further research should examine possible sex differences in nicotine dosing administered by other smoked and nonsmoked methods, as well as the developmental pattern of these differences during onset and during cessation of dependent smoking. Implications: Subjective perceptions of smoking cigarettes varying in nicotine contents differ between men and women. These results with research cigarettes are similar to other studies with carefully dosed nicotine administration by other means, supporting the notion that women, relative to men, are less sensitive to pharmacological factors and more sensitive to nonpharmacological factors in acute cigarette smoking. Future studies are warranted to examine sex differences in other responses to controlled nicotine intake via smoking, and via other smoked and nonsmoked methods of administering nicotine doses.
Introduction: Men and women may be differentially sensitive to the acute perceptual responses to smoking cigarettes that vary in nicotine content ("dose") but are matched on non-nicotine constituents. Methods: Dependent adult smokers (43 M, 31 F) took four controlled puffs from Spectrum research cigarettes that were moderate (16-17 mg/g) or very low (0.4 mg/g) in nicotine content, and matched on "tar." To ensure reliable responses, each cigarette was administered singly five times in random order under blind conditions, with one or the other provided every 15 minutes over a 2.5-hour session following overnight abstinence. Subjective perceptions (eg, "satisfying", "how much nicotine") were rated after each cigarette. Results: Subjective ratings differed due to cigarette nicotine content, as expected, and did so differentially between men and women. The interaction of nicotine content by sex was significant for most rated subjective perceptions of the cigarette, as multivariate analyses showed that differences due to nicotine content were highly significant for men (p < .001) but only marginal for women (p = .08). Conclusions: Relative to men, women's subjective responses to acute smoking are less sensitive to differences in cigarette nicotine content. To our knowledge, this is the first comparison of sex differences in response to very carefully controlled doses of smoked nicotine per se. Further research should examine possible sex differences in nicotine dosing administered by other smoked and nonsmoked methods, as well as the developmental pattern of these differences during onset and during cessation of dependent smoking. Implications: Subjective perceptions of smoking cigarettes varying in nicotine contents differ between men and women. These results with research cigarettes are similar to other studies with carefully dosed nicotine administration by other means, supporting the notion that women, relative to men, are less sensitive to pharmacological factors and more sensitive to nonpharmacological factors in acute cigarette smoking. Future studies are warranted to examine sex differences in other responses to controlled nicotine intake via smoking, and via other smoked and nonsmoked methods of administering nicotine doses.
Authors: Nadia Chaudhri; Anthony R Caggiula; Eric C Donny; Sheri Booth; Maysa A Gharib; Laure A Craven; Shannon S Allen; Alan F Sved; Kenneth A Perkins Journal: Psychopharmacology (Berl) Date: 2005-01-29 Impact factor: 4.530
Authors: Jed E Rose; Al Salley; Frederique M Behm; James E Bates; Eric C Westman Journal: Psychopharmacology (Berl) Date: 2010-04-01 Impact factor: 4.530
Authors: Y Wendy Huynh; Anthony Raimondi; Andrew Finkner; Jordan D Kuck; Carly Selleck; Rick A Bevins Journal: Psychopharmacology (Berl) Date: 2020-05-24 Impact factor: 4.530
Authors: Cecilia L Bergeria; Sarah H Heil; Danielle R Davis; Joanna M Streck; Stacey C Sigmon; Janice Y Bunn; Jennifer W Tidey; Chris A Arger; Derek D Reed; Thomas Gallagher; John R Hughes; Diann E Gaalema; Maxine L Stitzer; Stephen T Higgins Journal: Drug Alcohol Depend Date: 2019-02-13 Impact factor: 4.492
Authors: Joanna M Streck; Danielle R Davis; Raina D Pang; Stacey C Sigmon; Janice Y Bunn; Cecilia L Bergeria; Jennifer W Tidey; Sarah H Heil; Diann E Gaalema; John R Hughes; Maxine L Stitzer; Ellaina Reed; Stephen T Higgins Journal: Nicotine Tob Res Date: 2020-05-26 Impact factor: 4.244
Authors: Melissa Mercincavage; Kirsten Lochbuehler; E Paul Wileyto; Neal L Benowitz; Rachel F Tyndale; Caryn Lerman; Andrew A Strasser Journal: JAMA Netw Open Date: 2018-08-24
Authors: Rachel L Denlinger-Apte; Rachel N Cassidy; Suzanne M Colby; Alexander W Sokolovsky; Jennifer W Tidey Journal: Nicotine Tob Res Date: 2019-12-23 Impact factor: 4.244
Authors: Tracy T Smith; Eric C Donny; Xianghua Luo; Alicia M Allen; Dana M Carroll; Rachel L Denlinger-Apte; Sarah S Dermody; Joseph S Koopmeiners; F Joseph McClernon; Lauren R Pacek; Ryan Vandrey; Dorothy K Hatsukami Journal: Nicotine Tob Res Date: 2019-12-23 Impact factor: 4.244