Nanoscale dielectric resonators and quantum-confined semiconductors have enabled unprecedented control over light absorption and excited charges, respectively. In this work, we embed luminescent silicon nanocrystals (Si-NCs) into a 2D array of SiO2 nanocylinders and experimentally prove a powerful concept: the resulting metamaterial preserves the radiative properties of the Si-NCs and inherits the spectrally selective absorption properties of the nanocylinders. This hierarchical approach provides increased photoluminescence (PL) intensity obtained without utilizing any lossy plasmonic components. We perform rigorous calculations and predict that a freestanding metamaterial enables tunable absorption peaks up to 50% in the visible spectrum, in correspondence with the nanocylinder Mie resonances and of the grating condition in the array. We experimentally detect extinction spectral peaks in the metamaterial, which drive enhanced absorption in the Si-NCs. Consequently, the metamaterial features increased PL intensity, obtained without affecting the PL lifetime, angular pattern, and extraction efficiency. Remarkably, our best-performing metamaterial shows +30% PL intensity achieved with a lower amount of Si-NCs, compared to an equivalent planar film without nanocylinders, resulting in a 3-fold average PL enhancement per Si-NC. The principle demonstrated here is general, and the Si-NCs can be replaced with other semiconductor quantum dots, rare-earth ions, or organic molecules. Similarly, the dielectric medium can be adjusted on purpose. This spectral selectivity of absorption paves the way for an effective light down-conversion scheme to increase the efficiency of solar cells. We envision the use of this hierarchical design for other efficient photovoltaic, photocatalytic, and artificial photosynthetic devices with spectrally selective absorption and enhanced efficiency.
Nanoscale dielectric resonators and quantum-confined semiconductors have enabled unprecedented control over light absorption and excited charges, respectively. In this work, we embed luminescent silicon nanocrystals (Si-NCs) into a 2D array of SiO2 nanocylinders and experimentally prove a powerful concept: the resulting metamaterial preserves the radiative properties of the Si-NCs and inherits the spectrally selective absorption properties of the nanocylinders. This hierarchical approach provides increased photoluminescence (PL) intensity obtained without utilizing any lossy plasmonic components. We perform rigorous calculations and predict that a freestanding metamaterial enables tunable absorption peaks up to 50% in the visible spectrum, in correspondence with the nanocylinder Mie resonances and of the grating condition in the array. We experimentally detect extinction spectral peaks in the metamaterial, which drive enhanced absorption in the Si-NCs. Consequently, the metamaterial features increased PL intensity, obtained without affecting the PL lifetime, angular pattern, and extraction efficiency. Remarkably, our best-performing metamaterial shows +30% PL intensity achieved with a lower amount of Si-NCs, compared to an equivalent planar film without nanocylinders, resulting in a 3-fold average PL enhancement per Si-NC. The principle demonstrated here is general, and the Si-NCs can be replaced with other semiconductor quantum dots, rare-earth ions, or organic molecules. Similarly, the dielectric medium can be adjusted on purpose. This spectral selectivity of absorption paves the way for an effective light down-conversion scheme to increase the efficiency of solar cells. We envision the use of this hierarchical design for other efficient photovoltaic, photocatalytic, and artificial photosynthetic devices with spectrally selective absorption and enhanced efficiency.
Nanoscale solid-state systems
are boosting the prospects of material science by providing unparalleled
optical and electronic functionalities. Semiconductors with size comparable
to or smaller than the exciton Bohr radius (a few nanometers), such
as quantum dots and nanowires, display quantum-confinement properties.
The confinement of the electron wave function determines the quantization
of the energy states, accompanied by the widening of the semiconductor
band gap, the increase of radiative recombination, and the onset of
carrier multiplication.[1−3] A number of pioneering works have investigated the
interplay between plasmonic resonators and quantum dots, showing that
this interaction features enhanced absorption and emission rate.[4−6] Unfortunately, plasmonic resonances come with large parasitic losses,
heating due to dissipation in the metal, and incompatibility with
CMOS fabrication technology.[7−9] These drawbacks are particularly
detrimental for energy-related and -sustainable applications, which
require technological solutions excluding lossy metals and expensive/toxic
semiconductors.On the other hand, high-index dielectric nanoparticles
with size
of hundreds of nanometers support Mie resonances without utilizing
metal components.[10,11] Differently from plasmonic nanoparticles,
whose scattering is dominated by electric modes, their resonances
are both magnetic and electric in nature, with comparable strengths.[8,9,12] For refractive indices of >2,
available with group IV and group III–V semiconductors, dipole
and quadrupole resonant modes are well-defined.[9] Moreover, they guarantee reduced optical losses with respect
to their plasmonic counterpart.[7−9] Interference effects between magnetic
and electric dipole modes have been shown to enable directional light
scattering, as well as scattering suppression.[13,14] Building on the spectrally selective optical properties of the dielectric
scatterers,[12,15] dielectric metamaterials have
been very recently investigated for controlling the transmission/reflection
ratio in the infrared,[16] for light concentration
to an absorbing substrate,[17] for nonlinear
optical applications,[18] and for flat optics[19,20] and are currently being explored for photovoltaics.[21,22]Here, we explore the opportunity to combine quantum dots and
dielectric
resonators as building blocks of a hierarchical metamaterial, which
not only inherits the intrinsic optical and electronic properties
of its nanoscale constituents but also features enhanced performance.
This simple yet powerful scheme is of great impact for applications
in photovoltaics, photocatalysis, and artificial photosynthesis, as
well as for increasing the sustainability of the available optoelectronic
devices. In this work, we integrate quantum-confined luminescent silicon
nanocrystals (Si-NCs) within SiO2 nanocylinders, arranged
in a 2D array as depicted in Figure a–c. We demonstrate that the resulting metamaterial
preserves the radiative recombination properties of the Si-NCs, inherits
the spectrally selective absorption of the nanocylinder array, and
features enhanced emission intensity. As a proof of concept, we tackle
the spectral requirements of a light down-converter for solar cells,[23] namely, (i) total absorption of photons with
energy E > 2Egap and
(ii) total transmission of photons with E < 2Egap, where Egap is
the cell band gap (Egap ≈ 1.11
eV for Si). We address these requirements by designing a hierarchical
metamaterial optimized on three levels:
Figure 1
Schematic of the hierarchical
metamaterial: (a) quantum-confined
Si-NCs, (b) SiO2 nanocylinders resonating at the excitation
wavelength, and (c) photoluminescent 2D planar array. (d) HRTEM of
a Si-NC in a SiO2 matrix, (e) SEM of a SiO2 nanocylinder
with a height of 300 nm and diameter of 215 nm, and (f) SEM of the
2D metamaterial. Scale bars for panels (d)–(f) are 1 nm, 100
nm, and 1 μm, respectively.
Schematic of the hierarchical
metamaterial: (a) quantum-confined
Si-NCs, (b) SiO2 nanocylinders resonating at the excitation
wavelength, and (c) photoluminescent 2D planar array. (d) HRTEM of
a Si-NC in a SiO2 matrix, (e) SEM of a SiO2 nanocylinder
with a height of 300 nm and diameter of 215 nm, and (f) SEM of the
2D metamaterial. Scale bars for panels (d)–(f) are 1 nm, 100
nm, and 1 μm, respectively.(a) Si-NCs are quantum dots made of crystalline Si (see HRTEM
in Figure d) with
a typical
diameter of <10 nm. The electron wave function is broadened in
the momentum space due to the Heisenberg uncertainty principle, increasing
the rate of radiative recombination. Therefore, the constraint of
momentum conservation is relaxed (Si is an indirect semiconductor)
and Si-NCs show excitonic photoluminescence (PL) in the red/infrared
spectrum.[3,24] Notably, the occurrence of carrier multiplication
in ensembles of Si-NCs, due to a process named space-separated quantum
cutting (SSQC),[25,26] enables the down-conversion of
one high-energy photon into two photons with half of the original
energy. This has the huge potential to enable sunlight spectral shaping
and to truly improve the efficiency of solar cells by down-conversion.[23,27−29](b) The dielectric nanocylinders, shown in
the SEM of Figure e, are made of a
solid-state dispersion of Si-NCs in a SiO2 matrix (Si-NC:SiO2, in brief) and defined by electron-beam lithography. The
average size of the Si-NCs (∼2.6 nm) is 2 orders of magnitude
smaller than the wavelength of visible light, and, therefore, Si-NC:SiO2 is effectively a homogeneous medium. The effective refractive
index neff is a function of the volume
fraction of Si-NCs, and it is neff ≈
1.9 for the samples produced in this work (see Methods section). The excellent scattering properties of the nanocylinders
depend on their size, shape, and high refractive index neff, enabling the onset of Mie resonances in the visible
spectrum.[17,21,22](c)
The 2D hexagonal array of scattering nanocylinders forms an
optically thin metamaterial, as shown in Figure f, with enhanced absorption properties. Superabsorption
in a thin 1D dielectric metamaterial has been recently shown to arise
from the interference between the scattered and the incident waves,
which enables an optimal match of the optical impedances.[30] This results in a maximum absorption of 50%
for freestanding dielectric metamaterials, like their metal counterpart,
and 100% absorption with the support of a back-reflector.In
the following, we experimentally demonstrate that the investigated
metamaterial supports extinction peaks in correspondence with the
nanocylinder Mie resonances and the grating condition of the array,
whose spectral positions are tailored by geometrical design parameters.
Our numerical predictions show that the metamaterial absorption can
reach up to 50%. The optical losses in SiO2 are negligible
in the visible spectrum, and, therefore, the main contribution to
the absorption comes from optical transitions in the Si-NCs. We experimentally
prove that the increased absorption directly couples to the Si-NCs,
resulting in a 3-fold average PL enhancement per Si-NC. Specifically,
our experiments indicate that the PL intensity from the best performing
metamaterial is +30% compared to a planar Si-NC:SiO2 film
(without the nanocylinder patterning), despite that the number of
photoluminescent Si-NCs is reduced to 43%.The investigated
metamaterial can find application as an optically
thin down-converter of light on the front surface of commercial solar
cells. It is fair to remark that this application necessarily requires
a PL quantum yield (QY) above 50%, while the maximum value achieved
so far for Si-NC:SiO2 is 35%.[31] A flourishing and growing field of research is tackling the increase
of QY to match the requirements for applications.[31,32] Nevertheless, the fundamental goal of this work is to demonstrate
that the integration of quantum emitters into dielectric resonators
enables spectrally selective enhancement of photon absorption, obtained
without affecting the emitter radiative properties and resulting in
an overall increase of PL intensity. Although we propose and use a
specific material platform, the demonstrated principle is general
and can be applied to other semiconductor quantum dots and emitting
species, such as rare-earth ions and organic molecules. We envision
the application of this principle to areas such as light conversion
and spectral shaping for photovoltaics, but also photocatalysis and
artificial photosynthesis.
Methods
In the deposited Si-NC:SiO2 films, the size of Si-NCs
is 2 orders of magnitude smaller than the wavelength of visible light
and their volume fraction f is 17 ± 4%. Therefore,
Si-NC:SiO2 can be effectively approximated as a homogeneous
medium, with intermediate optical properties between Si and SiO2. Detailed studies of the refractive index of Si-NC:SiO2 films can be found in the literature,[33,34] showing that its value approaches 1.9 for the stoichiometry of interest
in our work (SiO with x ≈ 1.37) and that there is good agreement with the Maxwell–Garnett
formula.[35] Small deviations are due to
the fact that the electronic states of Si-NCs are strongly affected
by quantum confinement, and therefore the NC refractive index is different
from bulk Si. We apply the Maxwell–Garnett homogenization formula
to estimate the effective refractive index neff, as shown in Supporting Figure S1, and we find a good agreement with the measured transmission and
reflection data. The volume fraction f affects both
the optical and electronic properties of the Si-NC:SiO2 medium. Any change of f modifies the effective
refractive index according to the homogenization models: as the concentration
of Si increases, the refractive index becomes higher. Moreover, as f increases, the average distance between the Si-NCs is
reduced and the probability of SSQC increases as well. Our group demonstrated
the existence of an optimal distance for the probability of the SSQC
process.[36] Furthermore, the Si-NC size
has a strong influence on the PL QY, and an optimum size exists.[31] Therefore, the interplay between f, the deposition parameters, and the film thickness determines the
resulting PL spectrum, QY, and SSQC efficiency.[37,38]We fabricate three sets of metamaterials with nominal nanocylinder
height H = 100, 300, and 450 nm. For each height,
we produce (on the same substrate) six arrays with nanocylinder diameter
from D = 164 to 420 nm. A complete list of investigated
samples is provided in the Supporting Table S1. In order to have a fair comparison between metamaterials with the
same height, we keep the number of Si-NCs equal in all the metamaterial
geometries by fixing the nanocylinder area coverage (AC ≈ 43%).
This choice also determines the array spacing. Moreover, all the samples
with the same height, including the planar film used as reference,
are made starting from the same deposited Si-NC:SiO2 film,
and therefore the optical and electronic properties are the same.
The fabrication process consists of a sequence of eight steps (a–h),
as illustrated in Supporting Figure S2.
First, we deposit a planar film made of Si-NC:SiO2 with
thickness H = 100, 300, and 450 nm (on three different
substrates, steps a–c). Then, a nanolithographic method is
used to pattern the metamaterial geometry into the Si-NC:SiO2 films (steps d–h). The fabrication process results in hexagonal
2D arrays of Si-NC:SiO2 nanocylinders. The arrays have
a size of 30 μm. The resulting height H of
the nanocylinders is equal to the thickness of the original film deposited
in steps a–c.The optical extinction is measured in a
Zeiss Axio Observer inverted
microscope. The light source is a halogen lamp focused by a condenser
with numerical aperture NA = 0.35, and the transmitted light is collected
through a NA = 0.75 100× objective. The spectra are recorded
by a Princeton Instruments Acton SpectraPro SP2300 spectrometer equipped
with a PyLoN:400 (1340 × 400) cryogenically cooled charge-coupled
device (CCD). For the 0th-order extinction, we use a customized system
where the light source is a fiber-coupled lamp focused by a NA = 0.42
lens. The transmitted and reflected light beams are collected by identical
lenses (for the reflection we additionally use a half transparent
mirror) and delivered to an OceanOptics USB2000+Vis-NIR spectrometer.
The PL experiments are performed in the same Zeiss Axio Observer inverted
microscope. The excitation is the 488 nm line of a Spectra-Physics
Stabilite 2017 Ar laser, focused onto a fixed spot of 50 μm
by a 100× objective with NA = 0.75. The excitation power is fixed
at 2.5 mW. The PL signal is collected by the same objective by using
a dichroic mirror and measured by the spectrometer and the CCD camera.
The values reported here are the PL intensities integrated across
the emission spectrum. For the PL excitation experiment, we use the
415–537.5 nm signal of a SOLAR LP603-I optical parametric oscillator
(OPO), pumped by the third harmonic of a Nd:YAG LQ629-10 1064 nm laser
with 100 Hz repetition rate and 12 ns pulse duration. The OPO signal
is collimated and coupled to the inverted microscope, exciting the
samples perpendicularly to their surface. For the PL lifetime measurements,
we use the CW output at 445 nm of a Becker & Hickl diode laser,
modulated by a square wave with 1 kHz frequency, 100 μs ON-state,
and 3 μs fall time.[39] The detector
is an ID100 Quantique silicon avalanche photodiode with 40 ps timing
resolution, connected to a DPC-230 Becker & Hickl timing card.
Absolute QY measurements are performed for the planar Si-NC:SiO2 films before nanopatterning. The samples are placed in an
integrating sphere (7.5 cm in diameter, Newport) with the PL directed
into a Solar LS M266 spectrometer coupled with a Hamamatsu S7031-1108S
Vis-CCD camera. For excitation, we used a 150 W Hamamatsu L2273 xenon
lamp coupled to double grating Solar MSA130 monochromator. The measured
QY is ∼2%, while the maximum value achieved so far in the literature
is 35%,[31] which requires a time-consuming
optimization of the material deposition process (the absolute value
of the QY is not relevant for the concept demonstrated in this article).
The home-built Fourier microscopy setup consists of a 100× objective
with NA = 0.90, a set of telescope lenses L1 and L2 with equal focal
lengths (f = 20 mm), and a Fourier lens L3 (f = 200 mm). The detector is an Andor Technology silicon
CCD. The excitation is a PicoQuant LDH diode laser at 450 nm, and
a pinhole is used to selectively excite one metamaterial sample per
each acquisition.We use the transition matrix method, also
known as null-field,
to calculate the scattering cross-section spectra of individual nanocylinders.[40] In this method, the expansion coefficients for
the scattered field are retrieved by combining the null-field equation
with the boundary conditions. We also use the rigorous coupled wave
approach (RCWA), also known as the Fourier modal method, to calculate
the transmission (T), reflection (R), and absorption (A) spectra of the 2D arrays of
nanocylinders.[41] This method is particularly
suitable for simulating light interaction with periodic layered structures
that are invariant in the direction normal to the periodicity, due
to its Fourier basis representation. Under the conditions of perfectly
planar films and periodic arrays in the metamaterial regime (when
the incident wavelength is larger than the lattice spacing), only
the 0th-order transmittance T0 and reflectance R0 exist, and therefore we have T0 + R0 + A = 1. In transmission experiments, the extinction is the fraction
of incident light that does not reach the detector, defined as Ext
= 1 – T0, and therefore Ext = R0 + A. For real films and metamaterials
with surface roughness and geometrical imperfections, diffuse (i.e.,
nondirectional) scattering is also present, both transmitted toward
the side of the transmission (Tds) and
to the side of the reflection. Therefore, the actual transmittance
measured in a transmission experiment is T = T0 + Tds and Ext
= 1 – T = 1 – T0 – Tds. Given the diffuse
character of Tds, its contribution strongly
varies with the angular aperture of the collection optics. For sufficiently
narrow apertures we have Ext ≈ 1 – T0. Analogous considerations hold for the reflectance R.For periodic metamaterials in the grating regime
(when the incident
wavelength is equal to or shorter than the lattice spacing), highly
directional diffraction modes take place both in transmission and
in reflection. In our RCWA calculations, the total transmittance T and reflectance R take into account all
the diffraction modes of any order, including the 0th: T = T0 + T±1 + ··· + T± and R = R0 + R±1 + ··· + R±. In these calculations, the diffuse
scattering is zero because a perfect periodic geometry (in terms of
periodicity and unit cell shape) is assumed. Therefore, the absorption
is A = 1 – T – R.
Results and Discussion
The metamaterial
transmission, scattering, and absorption depend
on the nanocylinder size and distance. We quantify this dependence
by measuring the extinction spectra in the 350–600 nm spectral
range, as shown in Figure a–c for the nanocylinder height H =
100, 300, and 450 nm. The extinction is defined as 1 – T, with T being the transmittance collected
with an angular aperture ±49°, which comprises also significant
contributions from diffuse scattering (see Methods). The extinction spectra of the three planar Si-NC:SiO2 films are conveniently reported in black and are used as reference
samples throughout this article. For very thin metamaterials (H = 100 nm, Figure a), an extinction band appears with increasing diameter D, and the amplitude increases from 5% to only 20% at λ
≈ 400 nm. For metamaterials with H = 300 nm
(Figure b), the maximum
extinction amplitude is boosted up to 70%. In particular, for diameters
from 215 to 372 nm, we can distinguish the occurrence of broad extinction
peaks in the spectra. These spectra confirm that the nanocylinders
with a height of approximately 300 nm are efficient Mie scatterers,
whose modes rely on significant retardation effects along the propagation
direction. Eventually, if we further increase the metamaterials height
to H = 450 nm (Figure c), we observe a slight increase with respect to the
previous height and a shift in the extinction spectral features, in
agreement with previous numerical studies.[17]
Figure 2
Extinction
spectra (collection aperture ±49°) of metamaterials
with nanocylinder height (a) H = 100 nm, (b) 300
nm, and (c) 450 nm, parametrized for a diameter in the range 164–420
nm. The spectra of the reference planar films are reported in black
for each thickness H. The insets show representative
SEMs of the nanocylinder for each height. (d) 0th-order extinction
spectra (collection aperture ±25°) of metamaterials with H = 300 nm, parametrized for a diameter from D = 215 to 372 nm. The continuous (dashed) part of the spectra indicates
that the wavelength is longer (shorter) than the array spacing.
Extinction
spectra (collection aperture ±49°) of metamaterials
with nanocylinder height (a) H = 100 nm, (b) 300
nm, and (c) 450 nm, parametrized for a diameter in the range 164–420
nm. The spectra of the reference planar films are reported in black
for each thickness H. The insets show representative
SEMs of the nanocylinder for each height. (d) 0th-order extinction
spectra (collection aperture ±25°) of metamaterials with H = 300 nm, parametrized for a diameter from D = 215 to 372 nm. The continuous (dashed) part of the spectra indicates
that the wavelength is longer (shorter) than the array spacing.To shed light on the origin of
the observed spectral features,
we focus on the metamaterials with H = 300 nm and
measure the 0th-order extinction by narrowing the collection angular
aperture to ±25° to reduce the contribution of diffuse scattering.
The spectra, shown in Figure d, feature neat maxima, whose spectral position spans a wide
range from λ = 400 to 700 nm, depending on the nanocylinder
diameter. We can easily attribute them to the occurrence of dipoleMie resonances in the nanocylinders. According to a simple rule-of-thumb
formula, electric and magnetic dipole resonances appear close in the
spectrum, approximately at the wavelength[9−11]In
resonators with similar refractive index,
the magnetic resonance has been predicted to have a slightly larger
wavelength than the electric one.[17] Moreover,
the electric mode is expected to red-shift more quickly than the magnetic
one by increasing the nanocylinder size.[16] In our measurements, we observe a pronounced peak asymmetry for
all the investigated metamaterials and even a double peak for the
case D = 264 nm. In addition, we observe extinction
maxima occurring at shorter wavelengths than the Mie resonances. Their
spectral position approximately coincides with the array spacing S, revealing the fact that they are related to the grating
conditionWe conclude that our 2D metamaterial
design supports extinction
peaks due to the occurrence of Mie resonances of the nanocylinders
and due to the grating condition. Their spectral position is separate
and can be independently tuned by the nanocylinder shape (mainly the
diameter) and the array spacing.To better interpret the difference
between the measured extinction
spectra of Figure b and d, we perform rigorous full-wave electromagnetic calculations
of individual (i.e., isolated) nanocylinders and 2D hexagonal arrays.
The scattering spectra of individual nanocylinders with H = 300 nm are shown in Figure a and are characterized by broadband features, with local
maxima shifting as the nanocylinder diameter increases. On the other
hand, the calculated extinction spectra (1 – T) for 2D arrays of nanocylinders are shown in Figure b, and we can clearly distinguish sharp extinction
peaks due to dipoleMie resonances and grating modes. These calculations
indicate that the extinction measurements of Figure b are dominated by diffuse scattering from
the nanocylinders, while the peaks in the spectra of Figure d are due to collective resonant
modes (this difference is simply obtained by reducing the angular
aperture of the detection optics). The identification of the resonances
modes in the calculations for 2D arrays can be made by calculating
the spatial distribution of the electromagnetic field. As an example,
in Figure c we show
the electric and magnetic fields for the metamaterial with D = 264 nm excited at λexc = 440 nm (top)
and 485 nm (bottom). The first case corresponds to the Mie electric
dipole resonance, while the second case to the magnetic one.[16,17] We calculate the contribution of the absorption to the extinction
peak and show it in Figure d. Both the nanocylinder Mie resonances and the grating condition
induce absorption peaks, and a maximum absorption value of ∼50%
is predicted. This is in agreement with a recent investigation on
superabsorbing free-standing metamaterials, showing that 50% absorption
is achieved if the forward-scattered wave is exactly π-delayed
with respect to the incident one.[30] In Supplementary Figures S3 and S4 we calculate
the dependence of the absorption spectra on the nanocylinder diameter,
height, and distance. In Supplementary Figure S5, we demonstrate the condition for enhanced absorption for
our 2D metamaterial configuration.
Figure 3
(a) Calculated scattering cross-section
spectra of isolated nanocylinders
parametrized for the diameter D = 164 nm (cyan),
215 nm (blue), 264 nm (green), 314 nm (red), 372 nm (orange), and
420 (magenta). (b) Calculated extinction spectra of a 2D array of
nanocylinders parametrized for the diameter D (colors
as in panel a). (c) Electric (left) and magnetic (right) field distributions
for the metamaterial with D = 264 nm excited at λexc = 440 nm (top) and 485 nm (bottom). (d) Same as panel (b)
for absorption spectra. All the calculations are relative to nanocylinders
with height H = 300 nm.
(a) Calculated scattering cross-section
spectra of isolated nanocylinders
parametrized for the diameter D = 164 nm (cyan),
215 nm (blue), 264 nm (green), 314 nm (red), 372 nm (orange), and
420 (magenta). (b) Calculated extinction spectra of a 2D array of
nanocylinders parametrized for the diameter D (colors
as in panel a). (c) Electric (left) and magnetic (right) field distributions
for the metamaterial with D = 264 nm excited at λexc = 440 nm (top) and 485 nm (bottom). (d) Same as panel (b)
for absorption spectra. All the calculations are relative to nanocylinders
with height H = 300 nm.The calculated extinction peaks of Figure b are blue-shifted with respect to the experimental
ones of Figure d.
This is due to the fact that the substrate is neglected in the calculations
(i.e., the 2D array is free-standing). The effects of the substrate
have been already investigated, and they are well-known to determine
a red-shift of the resonances and a change in their relative amplitude.[17,30] Moreover, the calculated peaks feature a narrower spectral width
and a larger separation between the electric and magnetic resonances.
We attribute this to the significant geometrical imperfections of
the fabricated nanoscatterers, which are not ideal cylinders (the
top and bottom bases have different diameter, the top one is rounded,
the sides are not perfectly vertical, and the surface is not smooth).
Eventually, we also mention that the effective refractive index neff used in the calculations is just an approximation
of the actual index, since it is derived from a homogenization method.
In Supplementary Figures S6 we show a comparison
between experimental and calculated extinction spectra, the latter
taking into account the substrate and the geometrical imperfections
mentioned above.The comparison between experiments and calculations
conclusively
confirms the existence of absorption peaks in the investigated 2D
Si-NC:SiO2 metamaterials due to both the nanocylinder Mie
resonances and the grating condition. This absorption enhancement
in the Si-NCs is expected to produce an increase of their photoluminescence
intensity. As a matter of fact, at steady-state excitation the PL
intensity IPL, expressed as photon flux,
iswhere NT is the
number of Si-NCs and Iexc is the excitation
flux. The absorption cross-section is σ ≈ 10–15 cm2 under blue excitation, a value comparable with direct-band-gap
semiconductor quantum dots.[42,43] We measure the PL spectra,
shown in Figure a,
by exciting the samples with the 488 nm line of an Ar laser. To quantify
the effect of the absorption enhancement on the emission, we measure
the PL intensity of the metamaterials (for each of the three heights H) and compare it with that of the planar Si-NC:SiO2 film (of thickness equal to H) used as reference,
under the same excitation conditions. We perform these measurements
as a function of the nanocylinder size and of the excitation wavelength.
The average Si-NC concentration and PL QY are the same for all the
samples with the same height H (including the reference),
because they are fabricated starting from the same Si:NC:SIO2 film. However, the total number NT of
emitting Si-NCs in the metamaterials is lower than the reference (N/NT,meta = AC–1) due to the nanopatterning.
Therefore, we define the PL enhancement as
Figure 4
(a) Representative PL spectra of metamaterials
with H = 100 nm (cyan), 300 nm (olive-green), and
450 nm (tan) and with D = 215 nm excited at λexc = 488 nm. (b)
PL enhancement as a function of nanocylinder diameter of metamaterials
with H = 100 nm (cyan), 300 nm (olive-green), and
450 nm (tan), for λexc = 488 nm. (c) PLE enhancement
for the metamaterial with D = 215 nm (blue), 264
nm (green), 314 nm (red), and 372 nm (orange). Circles are relative
to the metamaterials with H = 300 nm; triangles are
for H = 450 nm. (d) CCD image (false color) of the
PL intensity from the metamaterial with H = 300 nm
and D = 372 nm (left) and the reference sample (right).
(a) Representative PL spectra of metamaterials
with H = 100 nm (cyan), 300 nm (olive-green), and
450 nm (tan) and with D = 215 nm excited at λexc = 488 nm. (b)
PL enhancement as a function of nanocylinder diameter of metamaterials
with H = 100 nm (cyan), 300 nm (olive-green), and
450 nm (tan), for λexc = 488 nm. (c) PLE enhancement
for the metamaterial with D = 215 nm (blue), 264
nm (green), 314 nm (red), and 372 nm (orange). Circles are relative
to the metamaterials with H = 300 nm; triangles are
for H = 450 nm. (d) CCD image (false color) of the
PL intensity from the metamaterial with H = 300 nm
and D = 372 nm (left) and the reference sample (right).The PL enhancement is shown in Figure b as a function of
the nanocylinder diameter,
for the three heights H = 100 nm (cyan), 300 nm (olive-green),
and 450 nm (tan). For the metamaterial with H = 100
nm, the PL enhancement increases with the diameter, and then it stays
constant at a value of ∼1. This simply means that the average
PL intensity per Si-NC is equal to that of the reference planar film.
Remarkably, for the sample with H = 300 nm, the absolute
PL intensity is equal to that of the reference, i.e., IPL,meta ≈ IPL,ref,
despite the lower amount of Si-NCs, and the maximum PL enhancement
exceeds 2 (PLenh ≈ AC–1). Eventually, for the sample with H = 450 nm, the
PL enhancement slightly decreases from the previous case, confirming
again the existence of an optimum nanocylinder height.In order
to confirm the dependence of the absorption enhancement
(and therefore of the PL intensity) on the excitation wavelength,
we performed photoluminescence excitation (PLE) experiments by scanning
the excitation range λexc = 415–530 nm. The
results are shown in Figure c, where the circles are relative to the metamaterials with H = 300 nm and the triangles are for H =
450 nm. The metamaterial with H = 300 nm and D = 215 nm (blue line) shows an increase of PL enhancement
toward short wavelengths, in proximity of the Mie extinction peak
at λ ≈ 420 nm measured in Figure d. Analogously, the sample with D = 264 nm (green line), which features an extinction peak at λ
≈ 500 nm, shows increased PL toward longer wavelengths up to
∼2.6. The sample with D = 372 nm (orange line)
deserves a separate mention, because it features a grating condition
in the investigated excitation range, and, interestingly, it shows
the highest enhancement value: the IPL meta/IPL ref ratio is 130% (+30%), and
the nominal ACmeta is 43%, resulting in an enhancement
PLenh = 3.02. This excellent performance, also shown in
the PL images of Figure d, is easily explained, since the fabrication method determines a
small deviation on the nanocylinders’ separations (±2
nm), which controls the grating condition, while a much larger error
affects their diameter (±10 nm) and shape (bases and surface
roughness), reducing the amplitude of the Mie absorption peak, as
listed in Supplementary Table S1. The metamaterials
with H = 450 nm show analogous trends, but with lower
absolute PL enhancement, as already observed in Figure b. In order to increase the enhancement factor,
we could improve the quality of the nanopatterning, in terms of the
nanocylinder diameter, shape, and distance, and by accurately matching
the optical impedance of the substrate, as previously discussed in
the text. However, while this effort is needed for real applications,
it is not strictly necessary to demonstrate the validity of our concept.In the following, we consider and systematically address all the
possible alternative explanations for the observed increase of PL
emission, namely, (i) the PL extraction efficiency and (ii) directionality,
(iii) the photonic density of states (PDOS), and (iv) the saturation
of the Si-NC absorption/emission states. As a matter of fact, the
metamaterial nanopattern can modify the PL extraction efficiency and
directionality by changing the effective Fresnel reflection and transmission
coefficients in the emission spectrum. Moreover, it can modify the
PDOS and affect the Si-NC radiative lifetime, due to the Purcell effect.[44,45] Eventually, it can lead to the saturation of the absorption/emission
states in the Si-NCs, resulting in an unfair comparison between samples
and artifacts in the determination of the PL enhancement. We unambiguously
prove that these phenomena do not significantly affect the PL intensity
of the investigated metamaterial geometries with respect to the reference
planar film, and we conclude that the increased absorption efficiency
is indeed the dominant process.A modification of the Fresnel
coefficients is simply detectable
in the reflection and transmission spectra. Figure a and b show the variation of the reflectance and of the transmittance , respectively, for the metamaterial
samples
with respect to the unpatterned film at normal incidence. For all
samples, the Mie resonances and the grating conditions are far from
the emission spectrum, indicated by the sea-green-shaded area. The
maximum values of and are 8%
at λ = 758 nm and 22% at λ
= 832 nm, respectively, while the average across the emission spectrum
is <2% for both. For each wavelength, we quantify the variation
of PL intensity due to changes of R and T by using a first-order approximation: and . By considering that the integrated PL
intensity is IPL = ∫IPL,s(λ) dλ, we find that the overall
change in PL intensity is only < 2% and < 3%. Therefore, the PL extraction efficiency
is approximatively the same for the metamaterial and the reference
samples.
Figure 5
Variation of the measured reflectance (a) and transmittance (b)
of the metamaterials with H = 300 nm and D = 215 nm (blue), 264 nm (green), 314 nm (red), and 372
nm (orange), with respect to the reference. The PL full width at half-maximum
(fwhm) spectral width is indicated by the sea-green-shaded area. Fourier
image of the transmitted light (c) and PL (d) for the metamaterial
with H = 300 nm and D = 264 nm.
(e) PL intensity time dynamics for the planar reference film (black)
and stretched-exponential fit (red). The inset shows the PL decays
for the sample metamaterial samples as in panel (a), plotted with
an artificial vertical offset, for the sake of clarity. (f) Dependence
of the PL intensity on the excitation power for the same sample as
in panel (c).
Variation of the measured reflectance (a) and transmittance (b)
of the metamaterials with H = 300 nm and D = 215 nm (blue), 264 nm (green), 314 nm (red), and 372
nm (orange), with respect to the reference. The PL full width at half-maximum
(fwhm) spectral width is indicated by the sea-green-shaded area. Fourier
image of the transmitted light (c) and PL (d) for the metamaterial
with H = 300 nm and D = 264 nm.
(e) PL intensity time dynamics for the planar reference film (black)
and stretched-exponential fit (red). The inset shows the PL decays
for the sample metamaterial samples as in panel (a), plotted with
an artificial vertical offset, for the sake of clarity. (f) Dependence
of the PL intensity on the excitation power for the same sample as
in panel (c).To directly exclude any
change in the PL directionality, we perform
Fourier (or k-space) microscopy of the PL intensity.
This technique is based on capturing the Fourier plane image formed
in the back focal plane of a high-NA objective, which contains the k-space information on the radiative field. For all the
samples, including the reference, the Fourier image is homogeneous,
which indicates an isotropic PL emission. Here we focus on one representative
metamaterial sample with H = 300 nm and D = 264 nm, and we first report in Figure c the Fourier image of the transmitted light.
It only shows the 0th-order central spot, which simply confirms that
the metamaterial is subwavelength at the excitation wavelength. The
Fourier image of PL is displayed in Figure d, and it shows isotropic emission. Therefore,
we can exclude any effect of the PL angular dependence on the observed
PL enhancement.Furthermore, a change in the PDOS in the metamaterial
samples would
significantly affect the PL spectrum and lifetime. On the contrary,
our measurements indicate that they do not change with the nanocylinder
diameter, and they are equal to those of the reference sample. Specifically,
the average PL lifetime is ∼45 ± 2 μs, as obtained
by fitting the decay with a stretched-exponential function. In Figure e, we show the PL
time dynamics of the reference sample (black) and of the metamaterial
samples with the highest PL enhancement (H = 300
nm and D = 215, 264, and 372 nm). Therefore, we can
exclude any effect of the PDOS on the observed PL enhancement. Eventually, Figure f shows the dependence
of the PL intensity on the excitation power for the representative
sample with H = 300 nm and D = 264
nm, which clearly indicates that all the samples were characterized
in the linear regime, far from the saturation of the Si-NCs. Therefore,
we can safely attribute the increased PL in the metamaterial samples
exclusively to the enhancement of the absorption at the excitation
wavelength. This result was remarkably achieved without affecting
the transmission/reflection properties in the emission spectrum. Moreover,
the emission properties in terms of angular pattern, lifetime, and
spectral shape are approximately the same as the planar sample without
nanocylinders.
Conclusions
In conclusion, we have
successfully integrated quantum-confined
Si-NCs into SiO2 nanocylinders, arranged into a 2D metamaterial.
This hierarchical metamaterial inherits the optical and electronic
properties of its building blocks and shows boosted performances over
the individual components. We have experimentally detected the occurrence
of extinction peaks related to dipoleMie resonances in the nanocylinders
and to the grating condition, which can be tailored throughout the
visible spectrum. Both of them induce spectrally selective enhancement
of the absorption, as predicted by our rigorous calculations. The
Si-NCs experience increased excitation and, as a consequence, exhibit
a more intense light emission. Remarkably, our experiments show that
the best-performing metamaterial features higher light emission than
a planar film without nanopatterning, despite the reduced amount of
Si-NCs. The metamaterial design principles described in this work
are applicable to any QD semiconductor and to other emitters such
as rare-earth ions and organic molecules. The specific implementation
investigated in this work is completely based on Si, it is fully compatible
with CMOS technology, and it can be integrated with Si solar cells
for spectral shaping purposes. We envision the application of this
approach to photovoltaics, photocatalysis, and photosynthesis.
Authors: James C Ginn; Igal Brener; David W Peters; Joel R Wendt; Jeffrey O Stevens; Paul F Hines; Lorena I Basilio; Larry K Warne; Jon F Ihlefeld; Paul G Clem; Michael B Sinclair Journal: Phys Rev Lett Date: 2012-02-29 Impact factor: 9.161
Authors: Maxim R Shcherbakov; Polina P Vabishchevich; Alexander S Shorokhov; Katie E Chong; Duk-Yong Choi; Isabelle Staude; Andrey E Miroshnichenko; Dragomir N Neshev; Andrey A Fedyanin; Yuri S Kivshar Journal: Nano Lett Date: 2015-09-29 Impact factor: 11.189
Authors: Arseniy I Kuznetsov; Andrey E Miroshnichenko; Mark L Brongersma; Yuri S Kivshar; Boris Luk'yanchuk Journal: Science Date: 2016-11-18 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: Mikhail V Zyuzin; Denis G Baranov; Alberto Escudero; Indranath Chakraborty; Anton Tsypkin; Elena V Ushakova; Florain Kraus; Wolfgang J Parak; Sergey V Makarov Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2018-04-17 Impact factor: 4.379
Authors: Tom Veeken; Benjamin Daiber; Harshal Agrawal; Mark Aarts; Esther Alarcón-Lladó; Erik C Garnett; Bruno Ehrler; Jorik van de Groep; Albert Polman Journal: Nanoscale Adv Date: 2022-01-07