| Literature DB >> 35518187 |
Hongcheng Yang1,2, Miao Zhou3, Haodong Tang1, Mingyu Sun1, Pai Liu1, Yizun Liu2, Lixuan Chen3,4, Dongze Li3, Dan Wu1, Junjie Hao1,2, Bing Xu1,2, Zhili Zhao1, Zhenwei Ren1, Siqi Jia1, Kai Wang1, Xiao Wei Sun1.
Abstract
Quantum dots (QDs) have received considerable attention in information displays owing to their high quantum yield, high colour purity and low-cost fabrication. However, light emission for ultra-thin QD films with low mass percentage of QDs still need to be improved because the blue light can directly transmit the films, leading to insufficient energy to excite the QDs. In this study, we report QD films based on a poly(zinc methacrylate) coating with alloyed green-emitting CdZnSeS/ZnS quantum dots (QDs@PZnMA) together with high refractive-index BaTiO3 nanoparticles to enhance the scattering coefficient of the QD films. Results demonstrate a 7.5-fold increase in the absorption coefficient, 11.3-fold increase in the scattering coefficient, 8.5-fold increase in the optical density (OD) and 8.6-fold increase in the green-light emission of QD films, compared with films that have the same mass percentage of pristine QDs. This approach provides a promising strategy for developing QD optical films with high scattering and enhanced light emission for flexible displays. This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry.Entities:
Year: 2020 PMID: 35518187 PMCID: PMC9056395 DOI: 10.1039/d0ra05389a
Source DB: PubMed Journal: RSC Adv ISSN: 2046-2069 Impact factor: 3.361
Scheme 1Illustration for light scattering within the QD films with the flexible poly(ethylene terephthalate) (PET) as protective layers: QD films made with pristine QDs (left), QDs@PZnMA (middle) and QDs@PZnMA with BaTiO3 as scattering particles (right).
Fig. 1TEM image of QDs@PZnMA (A); Fourier transform infrared spectra of CdZnSeS/ZnS QDs, zinc methacrylate (ZnMA) and QDs@poly(zinc methacrylate) (B).
Fig. 2TEM image (A) and UV-Vis diffuse reflectance spectrum (B) of BaTiO3 nanoparticles.
The absorption coefficient (μa) and scattering coefficient (μs) of QD films
| Labels | Samples/films |
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| a | QDs | 0.33 | 5.12 |
| b | QDs@PZnMA | 0.93 | 10.75 |
| c | QDs@PZnMA + 5.00 wt% BaTiO3 | 2.19 | 36.32 |
| d | QDs@PZnMA + 10.00 wt% BaTiO3 | 2.48 | 57.91 |
The quantum yield (QY, Ex = 450 nm), optical density (OD) and luminance of QD filmsa
| Labels | QD films | QY (%) | OD | Luminance (cd m−2) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| a | QDs | 71.2 | 0.06 | 478.1 |
| b | QDs@PZnMA | 78.3 | 0.14 | 835.1 |
| c | QDs@PZnMA + 5.00 wt% BaTiO3 | 75.2 | 0.36 | 1529.2 |
| d | QDs@PZnMA + 10.00 wt% BaTiO3 | 73.9 | 0.51 | 1679.5 |
The QY was measured by integrating sphere (Hamamatsu, C11347); optical density (OD) for 450 nm was performed by DIS system; the luminance was acquired by luminance meter on the cell phone blue emitting backlight (10 mW cm−2).
Fig. 3Luminance spectra acquired by luminance meter (A); the relationships between PL increase/luminance/optical density and scattering coefficient (B); PL spectra measured by integrating sphere (Hamamatsu, C11347) (C), photographs under white light (D) and UV light (E) for the films (5 cm × 5 cm) with QDs (a), QDs@PZnMA (b), QDs@PZnMA with 5.00 wt% BaTiO3 nanoparticles (c) and QDs@PZnMA with 10.00 wt% BaTiO3 nanoparticles (d), respectively.