Literature DB >> 29057197

Semi-Parametric Estimation and Inference for the Mean Outcome of the Single Time-Point Intervention in a Causally Connected Population.

Oleg Sofrygin1, Mark J van der Laan1.   

Abstract

We study the framework for semi-parametric estimation and statistical inference for the sample average treatment-specific mean effects in observational settings where data are collected on a single network of connected units (e.g., in the presence of interference or spillover). Despite recent advances, many of the current statistical methods rely on estimation techniques that assume a particular parametric model for the outcome, even though some of the most important statistical assumptions required by these models are most likely violated in the observational network settings, often resulting in invalid and anti-conservative statistical inference. In this manuscript, we rely on the recent methodological advances for the targeted maximum likelihood estimation (TMLE) of causal effects in a network of causally connected units, to describe an estimation approach that permits for more realistic classes of data-generative models and provides valid statistical inference in the context of network-dependent data. The approach is applied to an observational setting with a single time point stochastic intervention. We start by assuming that the true observed data-generating distribution belongs to a large class of semi-parametric statistical models. We then impose some restrictions on the possible set of the data-generative distributions that may belong to our statistical model. For example, we assume that the dependence among units can be fully described by the known network, and that the dependence on other units can be summarized via some known (but otherwise arbitrary) summary measures. We show that under our modeling assumptions, our estimand is equivalent to an estimand in a hypothetical iid data distribution, where the latter distribution is a function of the observed network data-generating distribution. With this key insight in mind, we show that the TMLE for our estimand in dependent network data can be described as a certain iid data TMLE algorithm, also resulting in a new simplified approach to conducting statistical inference. We demonstrate the validity of our approach in a network simulation study. We also extend prior work on dependent-data TMLE towards estimation of novel causal parameters, e.g., the unit-specific direct treatment effects under interference and the effects of interventions that modify the initial network structure.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Networks; causal inference; dependent data; interference; spillover; stochastic intervention; targeted maximum likelihood estimation

Year:  2016        PMID: 29057197      PMCID: PMC5650205          DOI: 10.1515/jci-2016-0003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Causal Inference        ISSN: 2193-3685


  17 in total

1.  Emergence of scaling in random networks

Authors: 
Journal:  Science       Date:  1999-10-15       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Causal Inference for a Population of Causally Connected Units.

Authors:  Mark J van der Laan
Journal:  J Causal Inference       Date:  2014-03

3.  Sensitivity analysis for contagion effects in social networks.

Authors:  Tyler J VanderWeele
Journal:  Sociol Methods Res       Date:  2011-05

4.  A graphical approach to the identification and estimation of causal parameters in mortality studies with sustained exposure periods.

Authors:  J Robins
Journal:  J Chronic Dis       Date:  1987

5.  Sampling Networks from Their Posterior Predictive Distribution.

Authors:  Ravi Goyal; Victor De Gruttola; Joseph Blitzstein
Journal:  Netw Sci (Camb Univ Press)       Date:  2014-04-01

6.  On causal inference in the presence of interference.

Authors:  Eric J Tchetgen Tchetgen; Tyler J VanderWeele
Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res       Date:  2010-11-10       Impact factor: 3.021

7.  Large sample randomization inference of causal effects in the presence of interference.

Authors:  Lan Liu; Michael G Hudgens
Journal:  J Am Stat Assoc       Date:  2014-01-01       Impact factor: 5.033

8.  Inference for influence over multiple degrees of separation on a social network.

Authors:  Tyler J VanderWeele
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2013-02-20       Impact factor: 2.373

9.  The spread of obesity in a large social network over 32 years.

Authors:  Nicholas A Christakis; James H Fowler
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2007-07-25       Impact factor: 91.245

10.  Semi-Parametric Estimation and Inference for the Mean Outcome of the Single Time-Point Intervention in a Causally Connected Population.

Authors:  Oleg Sofrygin; Mark J van der Laan
Journal:  J Causal Inference       Date:  2016-11-29
View more
  8 in total

1.  Causal inference when counterfactuals depend on the proportion of all subjects exposed.

Authors:  Caleb H Miles; Maya Petersen; Mark J van der Laan
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2019-04-03       Impact factor: 2.571

2.  Dependent Happenings: A Recent Methodological Review.

Authors:  M Elizabeth Halloran; Michael G Hudgens
Journal:  Curr Epidemiol Rep       Date:  2016-07-28

3.  Targeted maximum likelihood estimation of causal effects with interference: A simulation study.

Authors:  Paul N Zivich; Michael G Hudgens; Maurice A Brookhart; James Moody; David J Weber; Allison E Aiello
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2022-07-18       Impact factor: 2.497

Review 4.  Social Influences on Obesity: Current Knowledge, Emerging Methods, and Directions for Future Research and Practice.

Authors:  Natalie R Smith; Paul N Zivich; Leah Frerichs
Journal:  Curr Nutr Rep       Date:  2020-03

5.  Semi-Parametric Estimation and Inference for the Mean Outcome of the Single Time-Point Intervention in a Causally Connected Population.

Authors:  Oleg Sofrygin; Mark J van der Laan
Journal:  J Causal Inference       Date:  2016-11-29

6.  Spillover effects in epidemiology: parameters, study designs and methodological considerations.

Authors:  Jade Benjamin-Chung; Benjamin F Arnold; David Berger; Stephen P Luby; Edward Miguel; John M Colford; Alan E Hubbard
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  2018-02-01       Impact factor: 7.196

7.  Assortativity and Bias in Epidemiologic Studies of Contagious Outcomes: A Simulated Example in the Context of Vaccination.

Authors:  Paul N Zivich; Alexander Volfovsky; James Moody; Allison E Aiello
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2021-11-02       Impact factor: 5.363

8.  Inverse probability weighted estimators of vaccine effects accommodating partial interference and censoring.

Authors:  Sujatro Chakladar; Samuel Rosin; Michael G Hudgens; M Elizabeth Halloran; John D Clemens; Mohammad Ali; Michael E Emch
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2021-04-14       Impact factor: 1.701

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.