Literature DB >> 29055611

Mobile Versus Fixed Facility: Latinas' Attitudes and Preferences for Obtaining a Mammogram.

John R Scheel1, Allison A Tillack2, Lauren Mercer3, Gloria D Coronado4, Shirley A A Beresford5, Yamile Molina6, Beti Thompson7.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Mobile mammographic services have been proposed as a way to reduce Latinas' disproportionate late-stage presentation compared with white women by increasing their access to mammography. The aims of this study were to assess why Latinas may not use mobile mammographic services and to explore their preferences after using these services.
METHODS: Using a mixed-methods approach, a secondary analysis was conducted of baseline survey data (n = 538) from a randomized controlled trial to improve screening mammography rates among Latinas in Washington. Descriptive statistics and bivariate regression were used to characterize mammography location preferences and to test for associations with sociodemographic indices, health care access, and perceived breast cancer risk and beliefs. On the basis of these findings, a qualitative study (n = 18) was used to explore changes in perceptions after using mobile mammographic services.
RESULTS: More Latinas preferred obtaining a mammogram at a fixed facility (52.3% [n = 276]) compared with having no preference (46.3% [n = 249]) and preferring mobile mammographic services (1.7% [n = 9]). Concerns about privacy and comfort (15.6% [n = 84]) and about general quality (10.6% [n = 57]) were common reasons for preferring a fixed facility. Those with no history of mammography preferred a fixed facility (P < .05). In the qualitative study, Latinas expressed similar initial concerns but became positive toward the mobile mammographic services after obtaining a mammogram.
CONCLUSIONS: Although most Latinas preferred obtaining a mammogram at a fixed facility, positive experiences with mobile mammography services changed their attitudes toward them. These findings highlight the need to include community education when using mobile mammographic service to increase screening mammography rates in underserved communities.
Copyright © 2017 American College of Radiology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Latinas; Mobile mammography; mammovan; screening; underserved

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29055611      PMCID: PMC5756515          DOI: 10.1016/j.jacr.2017.08.030

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol        ISSN: 1546-1440            Impact factor:   5.532


  23 in total

Review 1.  Synthesising qualitative and quantitative evidence: a review of possible methods.

Authors:  Mary Dixon-Woods; Shona Agarwal; David Jones; Bridget Young; Alex Sutton
Journal:  J Health Serv Res Policy       Date:  2005-01

2.  Multi-level Intervention to increase participation in mammography screening: ¡Fortaleza Latina! study design.

Authors:  Gloria D Coronado; Ricardo Jimenez; Javiera Martinez-Gutierrez; Dale McLerran; India Ornelas; Donald Patrick; Robert Gutierrez; Sonia Bishop; Shirley A A Beresford
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2014-06-18       Impact factor: 2.226

3.  Neighborhood Predictors of Mammography Barriers Among US-Based Latinas.

Authors:  Yamile Molina; Jesse J Plascak; Donald L Patrick; Sonia Bishop; Gloria D Coronado; Shirley A A Beresford
Journal:  J Racial Ethn Health Disparities       Date:  2016-04-08

4.  Cost-effectiveness of detecting breast cancer in lower socioeconomic status African American and Hispanic women through mobile mammography services.

Authors:  M E Schweitzer; M T French; S G Ullmann; C B McCoy
Journal:  Med Care Res Rev       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 3.929

Review 5.  A systematic review of barriers and facilitators to mammography in Hispanic women.

Authors:  Bonnie Jerome-D'Emilia
Journal:  J Transcult Nurs       Date:  2014-05-05       Impact factor: 1.959

6.  Mammography capacity and appointment wait times: barriers to breast cancer screening.

Authors:  Elena B Elkin; Jacqueline G Snow; Nicole M Leoce; Coral L Atoria; Deborah Schrag
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2011-10-29       Impact factor: 2.506

7.  Sample size in qualitative research.

Authors:  M Sandelowski
Journal:  Res Nurs Health       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 2.228

Review 8.  Breast cancer interventions serving US-based Latinas: current approaches and directions.

Authors:  Yamile Molina; Beti Thompson; Noah Espinoza; Rachel Ceballos
Journal:  Womens Health (Lond)       Date:  2013-07

9.  Physician and Family Recommendations to Obtain a Mammogram and Mammography Intentions: The Moderating Effects of Perceived Seriousness and Risk of Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Yamile Molina; Beti Thompson; Rachel M Ceballos
Journal:  J Womens Health Care       Date:  2014-11

10.  Women's receptivity to church-based mobile mammography.

Authors:  Kathryn Pitkin Derose; Naihua Duan; Sarah A Fox
Journal:  J Health Care Poor Underserved       Date:  2002-05
View more
  3 in total

1.  Cancer Prevention in Low-Resource Countries: An Overview of the Opportunity.

Authors:  Sailaja Kamaraju; Jeffrey Drope; Rengaswamy Sankaranarayanan; Surendra Shastri
Journal:  Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book       Date:  2020-03

2.  Evaluation of a mobile mammography unit: concepts and randomized cluster trial protocol of a population health intervention research to reduce breast cancer screening inequalities.

Authors:  Elodie Guillaume; Quentin Rollet; Ludivine Launay; Séverine Beuriot; Olivier Dejardin; Annick Notari; Elodie Crevel; Ahmed Benhammouda; Laurent Verzaux; Marie-Christine Quertier; Guy Launoy
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2022-07-08       Impact factor: 2.728

3.  Patients characteristics related to screening mammography cancellation and rescheduling rates during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Authors:  Nita Amornsiripanitch; Sona A Chikarmane; Camden P Bay; Catherine S Giess
Journal:  Clin Imaging       Date:  2021-07-29       Impact factor: 1.605

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.