Bonnie Jerome-D'Emilia1. 1. Rutgers, School of Nursing-Camden, Camden, NJ, USA bjdem@camden.rutgers.edu.
Abstract
PURPOSE: A systematic review of the research on barriers and facilitators to mammography in Latinas was conducted to determine if the challenges faced by these women are unique to this population. METHOD: Medline and CINAHL database searches for the years 2005-2013 were included. The PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines were used to guide this review. RESULTS: Of the 174 articles identified, 18 articles met inclusion criteria. The most consistent findings were that income and education were associated with screening. CONCLUSIONS: Financial barriers and social characteristics were significant predictors of mammography in these studies, which were composed almost exclusively of low-income Latinas. These findings are similar to those found in other populations of low-income women and therefore are not likely unique to Latinas. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: It is likely that there is little difference between poor Latinas and other populations of poor, non-English-speaking women in barriers and facilitators to mammography.
PURPOSE: A systematic review of the research on barriers and facilitators to mammography in Latinas was conducted to determine if the challenges faced by these women are unique to this population. METHOD: Medline and CINAHL database searches for the years 2005-2013 were included. The PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines were used to guide this review. RESULTS: Of the 174 articles identified, 18 articles met inclusion criteria. The most consistent findings were that income and education were associated with screening. CONCLUSIONS: Financial barriers and social characteristics were significant predictors of mammography in these studies, which were composed almost exclusively of low-income Latinas. These findings are similar to those found in other populations of low-income women and therefore are not likely unique to Latinas. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: It is likely that there is little difference between poor Latinas and other populations of poor, non-English-speaking women in barriers and facilitators to mammography.
Authors: John R Scheel; Yamile Molina; Gloria Coronado; Sonia Bishop; Sarah Doty; Ricardo Jimenez; Beti Thompson; Constance D Lehman; Shirley A A Beresford Journal: Oncol Nurs Forum Date: 2017-01-01 Impact factor: 2.172
Authors: Sanja Percac-Lima; Jeffrey M Ashburner; Steven J Atlas; Nancy A Rigotti; Efren J Flores; Salome Kuchukhidze; Elyse R Park Journal: J Immigr Minor Health Date: 2019-12
Authors: John R Scheel; Allison A Tillack; Lauren Mercer; Gloria D Coronado; Shirley A A Beresford; Yamile Molina; Beti Thompson Journal: J Am Coll Radiol Date: 2017-10-19 Impact factor: 5.532
Authors: Jennifer J Salinas; Theresa Byrd; Charmaine Martin; Alok K Dwivedi; Adam Alomari; Rebekah Salaiz; Navkiran K Shokar Journal: Breast Cancer (Auckl) Date: 2018-06-18
Authors: Zeina Nahleh; Salman Otoukesh; Hamid Reza Mirshahidi; Anthony Loc Nguyen; Gayathri Nagaraj; Gehan Botrus; Nabeel Badri; Nabih Diab; Andres Alvarado; Luis A Sanchez; Alok K Dwivedi Journal: Cancer Med Date: 2018-05-07 Impact factor: 4.452
Authors: Charlotte J Talham; Francisco A Montiel Ishino; Katie M O'Brien; Dale P Sandler; Faustine Williams Journal: Cancer Med Date: 2022-02-12 Impact factor: 4.711
Authors: John S Luque; Ayaba Logan; Grace Soulen; Kent E Armeson; Danielle M Garrett; Caroline B Davila; Marvella E Ford Journal: J Cancer Educ Date: 2019-06 Impact factor: 1.771
Authors: Kristin E Morrill; Melissa Lopez-Pentecost; Guadalupe Ballesteros; Jeanne L Pfander; Melanie D Hingle; Yann C Klimentidis; Cynthia A Thomson; David O Garcia Journal: Syst Rev Date: 2019-12-01