Literature DB >> 25558437

Physician and Family Recommendations to Obtain a Mammogram and Mammography Intentions: The Moderating Effects of Perceived Seriousness and Risk of Breast Cancer.

Yamile Molina1, Beti Thompson2, Rachel M Ceballos2.   

Abstract

A growing body of literature has demonstrated psychosocial factors enable mammography intentions and usage among Latinas. Although these factors (e.g., family recommendations, breast cancer perceptions) likely influence one another, little research has examined interactive effects. The current study assessed the moderating effect of perceived breast cancer seriousness and risk on associations between recommendations to obtain mammography and mammography intentions. This sample included 97 Latinas in rural Eastern Washington State. After adjusting for age, two significant interactions emerged: perceived seriousness × physician recommendation and perceived risk × family recommendation. This exploratory study provides important directions for future communication research and planning to improve screening disparities.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Family recommendations; Latina; Mammography; Perceived risk; Physician recommendations

Year:  2014        PMID: 25558437      PMCID: PMC4281937          DOI: 10.4172/2167-0420.1000199

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Womens Health Care        ISSN: 2167-0420


  46 in total

Review 1.  Can cultural competency reduce racial and ethnic health disparities? A review and conceptual model.

Authors:  C Brach; I Fraser
Journal:  Med Care Res Rev       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 3.929

Review 2.  Disparities in screening mammography. Current status, interventions and implications.

Authors:  Monica E Peek; Jini H Han
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 5.128

3.  Breast cancer early detection, health beliefs, and cancer worries in randomly selected women with and without a family history of breast cancer.

Authors:  Miri Cohen
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 3.894

Review 4.  Health disparities in receipt of screening mammography in Latinas: a critical review of recent literature.

Authors:  Kristen J Wells; Richard G Roetzheim
Journal:  Cancer Control       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 3.302

5.  Barriers to genetic testing for breast cancer risk among ethnic minority women: an exploratory study.

Authors:  Beth A Glenn; Neetu Chawla; Roshan Bastani
Journal:  Ethn Dis       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 1.847

Review 6.  Breast cancer interventions serving US-based Latinas: current approaches and directions.

Authors:  Yamile Molina; Beti Thompson; Noah Espinoza; Rachel Ceballos
Journal:  Womens Health (Lond)       Date:  2013-07

7.  Patterns of agreement on breast cancer screening knowledge and practices among women in Dominican and Mexican families in New York City.

Authors:  Samantha Garbers; Mary Ann Chiasson
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2004-10-26

8.  Knowledge, attitudes, and perceptions about breast cancer and breast cancer screening among Hispanic women residing in South Central Pennsylvania.

Authors:  Raffy R Luquis; Irma J Villanueva Cruz
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  2006-02

9.  Cancer statistics for Hispanics/Latinos, 2012.

Authors:  Rebecca Siegel; Deepa Naishadham; Ahmedin Jemal
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2012 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 508.702

Review 10.  The relevance of fatalism in the study of Latinas' cancer screening behavior: a systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Karla Espinosa de Los Monteros; Linda C Gallo
Journal:  Int J Behav Med       Date:  2011-12
View more
  5 in total

1.  Improvements in Colorectal Cancer Incidence Not Experienced by Nonmetropolitan Women: A Population-Based Study From Utah.

Authors:  Brynn Fowler; N Jewel Samadder; Deanna Kepka; Qian Ding; Lisa Pappas; Anne C Kirchhoff
Journal:  J Rural Health       Date:  2017-04-20       Impact factor: 4.333

2.  Differential Use of Screening Mammography in Older Women Initiating Metformin versus Sulfonylurea.

Authors:  Jin-Liern Hong; Louise M Henderson; Michele Jonsson Funk; Jennifer L Lund; John B Buse; Virginia Pate; Til Stürmer
Journal:  Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf       Date:  2017-03-29       Impact factor: 2.890

3.  Family/friend recommendations and mammography intentions: the roles of perceived mammography norms and support.

Authors:  Yamile Molina; India J Ornelas; Sarah L Doty; Sonia Bishop; Shirley A A Beresford; Gloria D Coronado
Journal:  Health Educ Res       Date:  2015-08-31

4.  Mobile Versus Fixed Facility: Latinas' Attitudes and Preferences for Obtaining a Mammogram.

Authors:  John R Scheel; Allison A Tillack; Lauren Mercer; Gloria D Coronado; Shirley A A Beresford; Yamile Molina; Beti Thompson
Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol       Date:  2017-10-19       Impact factor: 5.532

5.  Acceptability, Utility, and Cost of a Mobile Health Cancer Screening Education Application for Training Primary Care Physicians in India.

Authors:  Sujha Subramanian; Regi Jose; Anoop Lal; Paul Augustine; Madeleine Jones; Bipin K Gopal; Shinu Krishnan Swayamvaran; Veena Saroji; Resmi Samadarsi; Rengaswamy Sankaranarayanan
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2021-07-27
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.