| Literature DB >> 29053741 |
Gamal M K Mehaisen1,2, Rania M Ibrahim1, Adel A Desoky1, Hosam M Safaa1, Osama A El-Sayed3, Ahmed O Abass1,2.
Abstract
Heat stress is one of the most detrimental confrontations in tropical and subtropical regions of the world, causing considerable economic losses in poultry production. Propolis, a resinous product of worker honeybees, possesses several biological activities that could be used to alleviate the deleterious effects of high environmental temperature on poultry production. The current study was aimed at evaluating the effects of propolis supplementation to Japanese quail (Coturnix coturnix japonica) diets on the production performance, intestinal histomorphology, relative physiological and immunological parameters, and selected gene expression under heat stress conditions. Three hundred one-day-old Japanese quail chicks were randomly distributed into 20 wired-cages. At 28 d of age, the birds were divided into 2 temperature treatment groups; a normal at 24°C (C group) and a heat stress at 35°C (HS group). The birds in each group were further assigned to 2 subgroups; one of them was fed on a basal diet without propolis supplementation (-Pr subgroup) while the other was supplemented with propolis (+Pr subgroup). Production performance including body weight gain, feed intake and feed conversion ratio were measured. The intestinal histomorphological measurements were also performed for all treatment groups. Relative physiological parameters including body temperature, corticosterone hormone level, malondialdehyde (MDA) and free triiodothyronine hormone (fT3), as well as the relative immunological parameters including the total white blood cells count (TWBC's), heterophil/lymphocyte (H/L) ratio and lymphocyte proliferation index, were also measured. Furthermore, the mRNA expression for toll like receptor 5 (TLR5), cysteine-aspartic protease-6 (CASP6) and heat shock proteins 70 and 90 (Hsp70 and Hsp90) genes was quantified in this study. The quail production performance was significantly (P<0.05) impaired by HS treatment, while Pr treatment significantly improved the quail production performance. The villus width and area were significantly (P<0.05) lower in the HS compared to the C group, while Pr treatment significantly increased crypts depth of quail. A negative impact of HS treatment was observed on the physiological status of quail; however, propolis significantly alleviated this negative effect. Moreover, quail of the HS group expressed lower immunological parameters than C group, while propolis enhanced the immune status of the quail. The relative mRNA expression of TLR5 gene was down-regulated by HS treatment while it was up-regulated by the Pr treatment. Furthermore, the positive effects of propolis in HS-quail were evidenced by normalizing the high expressions of CASP6 and Hsp70 genes when compared to the C group. Based on these results, the addition of propolis to quail diets as a potential nutritional strategy in order to improve their performance, especially under heat stress conditions, is recommended.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 29053741 PMCID: PMC5650467 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0186907
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Details of primers used for real-time PCR quantitative analysis.
| Gene | Forward primer sequences | Reverse primer sequences | Product size (bp) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 176 | |||
| 271 | |||
| 166 | |||
| 158 | |||
| 90 |
Least square means for the production performance traits as affected by heat stress and dietary propolis supplementation in Japanese quail.
| Items | n | Treatment groups | SEM | Main effects | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| C | HS | ||||||||
| - Pr | + Pr | - Pr | + Pr | HS | Pr | HSxPr | |||
| Initial body weight (g) | 25 | 192.0 | 193.7 | 190.1 | 189.5 | 2.58 | NS | NS | NS |
| Body weight gain (g/bird) | 25 | 29.0 | 37.9 | 16.0 | 26.0 | 0.33 | S | S | NS |
| Feed Intake (g/bird) | 5 | 101.0 | 108.7 | 65.0 | 83.2 | 1.32 | S | S | S |
| Feed conversion ratio | 5 | 3.5 | 2.9 | 4.1 | 3.2 | 0.04 | S | S | S |
a-d Means with different superscripts, within the same row, are significantly different (P<0.05).
n: number of observations per treatment group. SEM: standard error of the mean.
1 C: control groups that were exposed to 24°C; HS: heat stress groups that were exposed to 35°C; -Pr: subgroups without dietary propolis supplementation; +Pr: subgroups with dietary propolis supplementation.
2 HS: heat stress effect; Pr: propolis effect; HSxPr: interaction between HS and Pr effect. S: significant; NS: non-significant.
Least square means for the histomorphological measurements of small intestines as affected by heat stress and dietary propolis supplementation in Japanese quail.
| Items | n | Treatment groups | SEM | Main effects | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| C | HS | ||||||||
| - Pr | + Pr | - Pr | + Pr | HS | Pr | HSxPr | |||
| Intestinal length (cm) | 10 | 60.0 | 66.3 | 63.3 | 61.7 | 4.19 | NS | NS | NS |
| Villus length (μm) | 10 | 915.4 | 940.3 | 751.9 | 919.4 | 72.57 | NS | NS | NS |
| Villus width (μm) | 10 | 192.4 | 155.4 | 128.0 | 149.7 | 15.32 | S | NS | NS |
| Villus area (x103 μm2) | 10 | 166.1 | 126.3 | 84.5 | 82.7 | 19.41 | S | NS | NS |
| Crypts depth (μm) | 10 | 80.3 | 171.7 | 109.4 | 131.3 | 19.10 | NS | S | NS |
a-c Means with different superscripts, within the same row, are significantly different (P<0.05).
n: number of observations per treatment group. SEM: standard error of the mean.
1 C: control groups that were exposed to 24°C; HS: heat stress groups that were exposed to 35°C; -Pr: subgroups without dietary propolis supplementation; +Pr: subgroups with dietary propolis supplementation.
2 HS: heat stress effect; Pr: propolis effect; HSxPr: interaction between HS and Pr effect. S: significant; NS: non-significant.
Fig 1Visual examples for the histomorphological alteration in the intestinal villi of Japanese quail subjected to heat stress and supplemented with propolis in the basal diet (Scale bars 100 μm).
C: control groups that were exposed to 24°C; HS: heat stress groups that were exposed to 35°C; -Pr: subgroups without dietary propolis supplementation; +Pr: subgroups with dietary propolis supplementation. The thick arrow indicates the damage and desquamation observed at the tips of the intestinal villi, while the thin arrow indicates the normal structure of intestinal villi.
Least square means for some physiological parameters as affected by heat stress and dietary propolis supplementation in Japanese quail.
| Items | n | Treatment groups | SEM | Main effects | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| C | HS | ||||||||
| - Pr | + Pr | - Pr | + Pr | HS | Pr | HSxPr | |||
| Body temperature (°C) | 10 | 40.5 | 40.2 | 41.4 | 40.7 | 0.15 | S | S | NS |
| Corticosterone (ng/ml) | 5 | 2.8 | 2.6 | 8.0 | 5.0 | 0.56 | S | S | S |
| MDA (nmol/ml) | 5 | 1.8 | 1.8 | 3.4 | 2.4 | 0.24 | S | NS | NS |
| Free T3 (pg/ml) | 5 | 4.0 | 5.1 | 2.3 | 4.0 | 0.52 | S | S | NS |
a-c Means with different superscripts, within the same row, are significantly different (P<0.05).
n: number of observations per treatment group. SEM: standard error of the mean.
1 C: control groups that were exposed to 24°C; HS: heat stress groups that were exposed to 35°C; -Pr: subgroups without dietary propolis supplementation; +Pr: subgroups with dietary propolis supplementation.
2 HS: heat stress effect; Pr: propolis effect; HSxPr: interaction between HS and Pr effect. S: significant; NS: non-significant.
Least square means for some immunological parameters as affected by heat stress and dietary propolis supplementation in Japanese quail.
| Items | n | Treatment groups | SEM | Main effects | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| C | HS | ||||||||
| - Pr | + Pr | - Pr | + Pr | HS | Pr | HSxPr | |||
| TWBC’s (x103/mm3) | 5 | 81.8 | 131.2 | 60.4 | 108.8 | 8.24 | S | S | NS |
| H/L ratio | 5 | 0.4 | 0.3 | 0.8 | 0.6 | 0.04 | S | S | NS |
| T-lymphocyte proliferation (SI) | 5 | 4.2 | 6.3 | 1.6 | 3.0 | 0.40 | S | S | NS |
a-d Means with different superscripts, within the same row, are significantly different (P<0.05).
n: number of observations per treatment group. SEM: standard error of the mean.
1 C: control groups that were exposed to 24°C; HS: heat stress groups that were exposed to 35°C; -Pr: subgroups without dietary propolis supplementation; +Pr: subgroups with dietary propolis supplementation.
2 HS: heat stress effect; Pr: propolis effect; HSxPr: interaction between HS and Pr effect. S: significant; NS: non-significant.
Fig 2The hepatic relative expression of TLR5, CASP6, Hsp70 and Hsp90 genes as affected by heat stress and dietary propolis supplementation in Japanese quail.
Bars express the means ± standard error of means (n = 10). C: control groups that were exposed to 24°C; HS: heat stress groups that were exposed to 35°C; -Pr: subgroups without dietary propolis supplementation; +Pr: subgroups with dietary propolis supplementation. a-b Means within the same gene with different superscripts are significantly different (P<0.05). The main effects of heat stress (HS), propolis (Pr) and their interaction (HSxPr) are provided for each gene in the table (S: significant; NS: non-significant).