Literature DB >> 29053105

Biological and dosimetric characterisation of spatially fractionated proton minibeams.

Juergen Meyer1, Robert D Stewart, Daniel Smith, James Eagle, Eunsin Lee, Ning Cao, Eric Ford, Reza Hashemian, Jan Schuemann, Jatinder Saini, Steve Marsh, Robert Emery, Eric Dorman, Jeff Schwartz, George Sandison.   

Abstract

The biological effectiveness of proton beams varies with depth, spot size and lateral distance from the beam central axis. The aim of this work is to incorporate proton relative biological effectiveness (RBE) and equivalent uniform dose (EUD) considerations into comparisons of broad beam and highly modulated proton minibeams. A Monte Carlo model of a small animal proton beamline is presented. Dose and variable RBE is calculated on a per-voxel basis for a range of energies (30-109 MeV). For an open beam, the RBE values at the beam entrance ranged from 1.02-1.04, at the Bragg peak (BP) from 1.3 to 1.6, and at the distal end of the BP from 1.4 to 2.0. For a 50 MeV proton beam, a minibeam collimator designed to produce uniform dose at the depth of the BP peak, had minimal impact on the open beam RBE values at depth. RBE changes were observed near the surface when the collimator was placed flush with the irradiated object, due to a higher neutron contribution derived from proton interactions with the collimator. For proton minibeams, the relative mean RBE weighted entrance dose (RWD) was ~25% lower than the physical mean dose. A strong dependency of the EUD with fraction size was observed. For 20 Gy fractions, the EUD varied widely depending on the radiosensitivity of the cells. For radiosensitive cells, the difference was up to ~50% in mean dose and ~40% in mean RWD and the EUD trended towards the valley dose rather than the mean dose. For comparative studies of uniform dose with spatially fractionated proton minibeams, EUD derived from a per-voxel RWD distribution is recommended for biological assessments of reproductive cell survival and related endpoints.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29053105     DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/aa950c

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  8 in total

1.  Exploring the feasibility of a clinical proton beam with an adaptive aperture for pre-clinical research.

Authors:  Isabel P Almeida; Ana Vaniqui; Lotte Ejr Schyns; Brent van der Heyden; James Cooley; Townsend Zwart; Armin Langenegger; Frank Verhaegen
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2018-11-07       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 2.  Spatially fractionated proton minibeams.

Authors:  Juergen Meyer; John Eley; Thomas E Schmid; Stephanie E Combs; Remi Dendale; Yolanda Prezado
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2018-11-07       Impact factor: 3.039

3.  Proton minibeams-a springboard for physics, biology and clinical creativity.

Authors:  F Avraham Dilmanian; Bhanu P Venkatesulu; Narayan Sahoo; Xiaodong Wu; Jessica R Nassimi; Steven Herchko; Jiade Lu; Bilikere S Dwarakanath; John G Eley; Sunil Krishnan
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2020-01-24       Impact factor: 3.039

4.  Comparison of the [18F]-FDG and [18F]-FLT PET Tracers in the Evaluation of the Preclinical Proton Therapy Response in Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

Authors:  David Brasse; Hélène Burckel; Patrice Marchand; Marc Rousseau; Ali Ouadi; Marie Vanstalle; Christian Finck; Patrice Laquerriere; Frédéric Boisson
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2021-04-13       Impact factor: 3.488

5.  Iodine nanoparticles enhance radiotherapy of intracerebral human glioma in mice and increase efficacy of chemotherapy.

Authors:  James F Hainfeld; Sharif M Ridwan; Yaroslav Stanishevskiy; Rahul Panchal; Daniel N Slatkin; Henry M Smilowitz
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-03-14       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Clinical microbeam radiation therapy with a compact source: specifications of the line-focus X-ray tube.

Authors:  Johanna Winter; Marek Galek; Christoph Matejcek; Jan J Wilkens; Kurt Aulenbacher; Stephanie E Combs; Stefan Bartzsch
Journal:  Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol       Date:  2020-06-11

7.  Treatment Planning Study for Microbeam Radiotherapy Using Clinical Patient Data.

Authors:  Kim Melanie Kraus; Johanna Winter; Yating Zhang; Mabroor Ahmed; Stephanie Elisabeth Combs; Jan Jakob Wilkens; Stefan Bartzsch
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-01-28       Impact factor: 6.639

8.  Heavy Ion Minibeam Therapy: Side Effects in Normal Brain.

Authors:  John G Eley; Catherine W Haga; Asaf Keller; Ellis M Lazenby; Charles Raver; Adam Rusek; Farrokh Avraham Dilmanian; Sunil Krishnan; Jaylyn Waddell
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-09       Impact factor: 6.639

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.