Michelle W Moore1,2, Julie A Fiez2,3,4, Connie A Tompkins2,4. 1. West Virginia University, Morgantown. 2. University of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. 3. Learning Research and Development Center, Pittsburgh, PA. 4. Center for the Neural Basis of Cognition, Pittsburgh, PA.
Abstract
Purpose: Most research examining long-term-memory effects on nonword repetition (NWR) has focused on lexical-level variables. Phoneme-level variables have received little attention, although there are reasons to expect significant sublexical effects in NWR. To further understand the underlying processes of NWR, this study examined effects of sublexical long-term phonological knowledge by testing whether performance differs when the stimuli comprise consonants acquired later versus earlier in speech development. Method: Thirty (Experiment 1) and 20 (Experiment 2) college students completed tasks that investigated whether an experimental phoneme-level variable (consonant age of acquisition) similarly affects NWR and lexical-access tasks designed to vary in articulatory, auditory-perceptual, and phonological short-term-memory demands. The lexical-access tasks were performed in silence or with concurrent articulation to explore whether consonant age-of-acquisition effects arise before or after articulatory planning. Results: NWR accuracy decreased on items comprising later- versus earlier-acquired phonemes. Similar consonant age-of-acquisition effects were observed in accuracy measures of nonword reading and lexical decision performed in silence or with concurrent articulation. Conclusion: Results indicate that NWR performance is sensitive to phoneme-level phonological knowledge in long-term memory. NWR, accordingly, should not be regarded as a diagnostic tool for pure impairment of phonological short-term memory. Supplemental Materials: https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.5435137.
Purpose: Most research examining long-term-memory effects on nonword repetition (NWR) has focused on lexical-level variables. Phoneme-level variables have received little attention, although there are reasons to expect significant sublexical effects in NWR. To further understand the underlying processes of NWR, this study examined effects of sublexical long-term phonological knowledge by testing whether performance differs when the stimuli comprise consonants acquired later versus earlier in speech development. Method: Thirty (Experiment 1) and 20 (Experiment 2) college students completed tasks that investigated whether an experimental phoneme-level variable (consonant age of acquisition) similarly affects NWR and lexical-access tasks designed to vary in articulatory, auditory-perceptual, and phonological short-term-memory demands. The lexical-access tasks were performed in silence or with concurrent articulation to explore whether consonant age-of-acquisition effects arise before or after articulatory planning. Results: NWR accuracy decreased on items comprising later- versus earlier-acquired phonemes. Similar consonant age-of-acquisition effects were observed in accuracy measures of nonword reading and lexical decision performed in silence or with concurrent articulation. Conclusion: Results indicate that NWR performance is sensitive to phoneme-level phonological knowledge in long-term memory. NWR, accordingly, should not be regarded as a diagnostic tool for pure impairment of phonological short-term memory. Supplemental Materials: https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.5435137.
Authors: David A Balota; Melvin J Yap; Michael J Cortese; Keith A Hutchison; Brett Kessler; Bjorn Loftis; James H Neely; Douglas L Nelson; Greg B Simpson; Rebecca Treiman Journal: Behav Res Methods Date: 2007-08
Authors: A Chrabaszcz; D Wang; W J Lipski; A Bush; D J Crammond; S Shaiman; M W Dickey; L L Holt; R S Turner; J A Fiez; R M Richardson Journal: J Neurolinguistics Date: 2021-06-28 Impact factor: 1.710
Authors: Witold J Lipski; Ahmad Alhourani; Tara Pirnia; Peter W Jones; Christina Dastolfo-Hromack; Leah B Helou; Donald J Crammond; Susan Shaiman; Michael W Dickey; Lori L Holt; Robert S Turner; Julie A Fiez; R Mark Richardson Journal: J Neurosci Date: 2018-05-22 Impact factor: 6.167
Authors: Anna Chrabaszcz; Wolf-Julian Neumann; Otilia Stretcu; Witold J Lipski; Alan Bush; Christina A Dastolfo-Hromack; Dengyu Wang; Donald J Crammond; Susan Shaiman; Michael W Dickey; Lori L Holt; Robert S Turner; Julie A Fiez; R Mark Richardson Journal: J Neurosci Date: 2019-01-30 Impact factor: 6.167
Authors: C Dastolfo-Hromack; A Bush; A Chrabaszcz; A Alhourani; W Lipski; D Wang; D J Crammond; S Shaiman; M W Dickey; L L Holt; R S Turner; J A Fiez; R M Richardson Journal: Cereb Cortex Date: 2022-03-30 Impact factor: 4.861