Literature DB >> 29052729

Consonant Age-of-Acquisition Effects in Nonword Repetition Are Not Articulatory in Nature.

Michelle W Moore1,2, Julie A Fiez2,3,4, Connie A Tompkins2,4.   

Abstract

Purpose: Most research examining long-term-memory effects on nonword repetition (NWR) has focused on lexical-level variables. Phoneme-level variables have received little attention, although there are reasons to expect significant sublexical effects in NWR. To further understand the underlying processes of NWR, this study examined effects of sublexical long-term phonological knowledge by testing whether performance differs when the stimuli comprise consonants acquired later versus earlier in speech development. Method: Thirty (Experiment 1) and 20 (Experiment 2) college students completed tasks that investigated whether an experimental phoneme-level variable (consonant age of acquisition) similarly affects NWR and lexical-access tasks designed to vary in articulatory, auditory-perceptual, and phonological short-term-memory demands. The lexical-access tasks were performed in silence or with concurrent articulation to explore whether consonant age-of-acquisition effects arise before or after articulatory planning.
Results: NWR accuracy decreased on items comprising later- versus earlier-acquired phonemes. Similar consonant age-of-acquisition effects were observed in accuracy measures of nonword reading and lexical decision performed in silence or with concurrent articulation.
Conclusion: Results indicate that NWR performance is sensitive to phoneme-level phonological knowledge in long-term memory. NWR, accordingly, should not be regarded as a diagnostic tool for pure impairment of phonological short-term memory. Supplemental Materials: https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.5435137.

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29052729      PMCID: PMC5945079          DOI: 10.1044/2017_JSLHR-L-16-0359

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res        ISSN: 1092-4388            Impact factor:   2.297


  43 in total

Review 1.  A theory of lexical access in speech production.

Authors:  W J Levelt; A Roelofs; A S Meyer
Journal:  Behav Brain Sci       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 12.579

2.  Phonological processing, language, and literacy: a comparison of children with mild-to-moderate sensorineural hearing loss and those with specific language impairment.

Authors:  J Briscoe; D V Bishop; C F Norbury
Journal:  J Child Psychol Psychiatry       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 8.982

3.  Sublexical or lexical effects on serial recall of nonwords?

Authors:  Steven Roodenrys; Melinda Hinton
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 3.051

4.  The role of genes in the etiology of specific language impairment.

Authors:  D V M Bishop
Journal:  J Commun Disord       Date:  2002 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.288

5.  How does learning to read affect speech perception?

Authors:  Chotiga Pattamadilok; Iris N Knierim; Keith J Kawabata Duncan; Joseph T Devlin
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2010-06-23       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  A web-based interface to calculate phonotactic probability for words and nonwords in English.

Authors:  Michael S Vitevitch; Paul A Luce
Journal:  Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput       Date:  2004-08

Review 7.  Maximum performance tests of speech production.

Authors:  R D Kent; J F Kent; J C Rosenbek
Journal:  J Speech Hear Disord       Date:  1987-11

8.  The influence of children's exposure to language from two to six years: The case of nonword repetition.

Authors:  Gary Jones
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2016-05-04

9.  Motor Control and Nonword Repetition in Specific Working Memory Impairment and SLI.

Authors:  Lisa M D Archibald; Marc F Joanisse; Benjamin Munson
Journal:  Top Lang Disord       Date:  2013-07

10.  The English Lexicon Project.

Authors:  David A Balota; Melvin J Yap; Michael J Cortese; Keith A Hutchison; Brett Kessler; Bjorn Loftis; James H Neely; Douglas L Nelson; Greg B Simpson; Rebecca Treiman
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2007-08
View more
  5 in total

1.  Simultaneously recorded subthalamic and cortical LFPs reveal different lexicality effects during reading aloud.

Authors:  A Chrabaszcz; D Wang; W J Lipski; A Bush; D J Crammond; S Shaiman; M W Dickey; L L Holt; R S Turner; J A Fiez; R M Richardson
Journal:  J Neurolinguistics       Date:  2021-06-28       Impact factor: 1.710

2.  Subthalamic Nucleus Neurons Differentially Encode Early and Late Aspects of Speech Production.

Authors:  Witold J Lipski; Ahmad Alhourani; Tara Pirnia; Peter W Jones; Christina Dastolfo-Hromack; Leah B Helou; Donald J Crammond; Susan Shaiman; Michael W Dickey; Lori L Holt; Robert S Turner; Julie A Fiez; R Mark Richardson
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2018-05-22       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Consonant Age of Acquisition Reveals Nonlinear Effects in Nonword Repetition Performance.

Authors:  Michelle W Moore; Karen E Rambo-Hernandez; Taylor L McDonald
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2022-07-23

4.  Subthalamic Nucleus and Sensorimotor Cortex Activity During Speech Production.

Authors:  Anna Chrabaszcz; Wolf-Julian Neumann; Otilia Stretcu; Witold J Lipski; Alan Bush; Christina A Dastolfo-Hromack; Dengyu Wang; Donald J Crammond; Susan Shaiman; Michael W Dickey; Lori L Holt; Robert S Turner; Julie A Fiez; R Mark Richardson
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2019-01-30       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Articulatory Gain Predicts Motor Cortex and Subthalamic Nucleus Activity During Speech.

Authors:  C Dastolfo-Hromack; A Bush; A Chrabaszcz; A Alhourani; W Lipski; D Wang; D J Crammond; S Shaiman; M W Dickey; L L Holt; R S Turner; J A Fiez; R M Richardson
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2022-03-30       Impact factor: 4.861

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.