Literature DB >> 20573891

How does learning to read affect speech perception?

Chotiga Pattamadilok1, Iris N Knierim, Keith J Kawabata Duncan, Joseph T Devlin.   

Abstract

Behavioral studies have demonstrated that learning to read and write affects the processing of spoken language. The present study investigates the neural mechanism underlying the emergence of such orthographic effects during speech processing. Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) was used to tease apart two competing hypotheses that consider this orthographic influence to be either a consequence of a change in the nature of the phonological representations during literacy acquisition or a consequence of online coactivation of the orthographic and phonological representations during speech processing. Participants performed an auditory lexical decision task in which the orthographic consistency of spoken words was manipulated and repetitive TMS was used to interfere with either phonological or orthographic processing by stimulating left supramarginal gyrus (SMG) or left ventral occipitotemporal cortex (vOTC), respectively. The advantage for consistently spelled words was removed only when the stimulation was delivered to SMG and not to vOTC, providing strong evidence that this effect arises at a phonological, rather than an orthographic, level. We propose a possible mechanistic explanation for the role of SMG in phonological processing and how this is affected by learning to read.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20573891      PMCID: PMC6634630          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5791-09.2010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  25 in total

1.  Hemispheric specialization for visual words is shaped by attention to sublexical units during initial learning.

Authors:  Yuliya N Yoncheva; Jessica Wise; Bruce McCandliss
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2015-05-16       Impact factor: 2.381

2.  Reading acquisition reorganizes the phonological awareness network only in alphabetic writing systems.

Authors:  Christine Brennan; Fan Cao; Nicole Pedroarena-Leal; Chris McNorgan; James R Booth
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2012-07-19       Impact factor: 5.038

3.  Consonant Age-of-Acquisition Effects in Nonword Repetition Are Not Articulatory in Nature.

Authors:  Michelle W Moore; Julie A Fiez; Connie A Tompkins
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2017-11-09       Impact factor: 2.297

4.  Orthographic influence on spoken word identification: Behavioral and fMRI evidence.

Authors:  Christine Chiarello; Kenneth I Vaden; Mark A Eckert
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2018-01-31       Impact factor: 3.139

5.  Effects of rhyme and spelling patterns on auditory word ERPs depend on selective attention to phonology.

Authors:  Yuliya N Yoncheva; Urs Maurer; Jason D Zevin; Bruce D McCandliss
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2013-02-09       Impact factor: 2.381

6.  The Science of Reading and Its Educational Implications.

Authors:  Mark S Seidenberg
Journal:  Lang Learn Dev       Date:  2013

7.  Syntactic computation in the human brain: the degree of merger as a key factor.

Authors:  Shinri Ohta; Naoki Fukui; Kuniyoshi L Sakai
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-02-20       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Abstract and concrete sentences, embodiment, and languages.

Authors:  Claudia Scorolli; Ferdinand Binkofski; Giovanni Buccino; Roberto Nicoletti; Lucia Riggio; Anna Maria Borghi
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2011-09-15

9.  Orthographic consistency and word-frequency effects in auditory word recognition: new evidence from lexical decision and rime detection.

Authors:  Ana Petrova; M Gareth Gaskell; Ludovic Ferrand
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2011-10-19

10.  Phonemic Training Modulates Early Speech Processing in Pre-reading Children.

Authors:  Anne Bauch; Claudia K Friedrich; Ulrike Schild
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2021-06-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.