Literature DB >> 29050901

Medical device-related pressure injuries: An exploratory descriptive study in an acute tertiary hospital in Australia.

Michelle Barakat-Johnson1, Catherine Barnett2, Timothy Wand3, Kathryn White4.   

Abstract

AIM: To examine and explore medical device-related pressure injuries in an 800-bed tertiary hospital.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: An exploratory descriptive study design was employed. A prospective review of all data on reported hospital-acquired pressure injuries was conducted on a weekly basis from July 2015 to August 2016. This included a patient assessment and medical record review as well as brief semi-structured interviews with nurses.
RESULTS: The overall incidence of medical device-related pressure injuries was 27.9% (50/179) with the majority (68%, 34/50) occurring in intensive care. The most common cause of a medical device-related pressure injury was oxygen tubing behind ears (n = 21) and endotracheal tubes (n = 13). Nurses were unaware of the implications of medical devices in contact with the skin and patient medical records did not present a valuable source of information in relation to pressure injury prevention.
CONCLUSION: Medical device-related pressure injuries were represented in 27.9% of our entire patient cohort; primarily occurring on the ear from oxygen tubing and on the mouth from endotracheal tubes in patients in intensive care. Additional support, education and monitoring for nurses at a local level on the prevention of medical device-related pressure injuries is necessary to prevent their occurrence. Furthermore, consensus on the classification and reporting of medical device-related pressure injuries is still in development, making reporting and monitoring challenging. Medical device-related pressure injuries are a continuing clinical issue that require further exploration.
Copyright © 2017 Tissue Viability Society. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Device-related; Exploratory descriptive study; Hospital-acquired; Medical device; Pressure injury; Pressure ulcer

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29050901     DOI: 10.1016/j.jtv.2017.09.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Tissue Viability        ISSN: 0965-206X            Impact factor:   2.932


  10 in total

1.  Securement to prevent device-related pressure injuries in the intensive care unit: A randomised controlled feasibility study.

Authors:  Fiona Coyer; Jane-Louise Cook; Wendy Brown; Amanda Vann; Anna Doubrovsky
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2020-06-28       Impact factor: 3.315

2.  The Prevalence, Characteristics, and Prevention Status of Skin Injury Caused by Personal Protective Equipment Among Medical Staff in Fighting COVID-19: A Multicenter, Cross-Sectional Study.

Authors:  Qixia Jiang; Siping Song; Jihong Zhou; Yuxiu Liu; Aihua Chen; Yuxuan Bai; Jing Wang; Zhixia Jiang; Yanhong Zhang; Haiying Liu; Jiao Hua; Jinli Guo; Qiuying Han; Yongli Tang; Jiayu Xue
Journal:  Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle)       Date:  2020-04-27       Impact factor: 4.730

3.  Evaluation of a fluidised positioner to reduce occipital pressure injuries in intensive care patients: A pilot study.

Authors:  Michelle Barakat-Johnson; Michelle Lai; Amit Gefen; Fiona Coyer
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2018-12-17       Impact factor: 3.315

4.  Which endotracheal tube location minimises the device-related pressure ulcer risk: The centre or a corner of the mouth?

Authors:  Golan Amrani; Amit Gefen
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2019-11-14       Impact factor: 3.315

5.  Incidence and risk factors for medical device-related pressure ulcers: The first report in this regard in Iran.

Authors:  Farnoosh Rashvand; Lida Shamekhi; Hossein Rafiei; Mohammad Nosrataghaei
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2019-12-18       Impact factor: 3.315

6.  Medical device related pressure ulcers in Jordan: Prevalence study among critically ill patients.

Authors:  Yahya W Najjar; Mohammad Y Saleh; Zeinab M Hassan
Journal:  Health Sci Rep       Date:  2022-05-05

7.  Evaluation of facial tissue stresses under medical devices post application of a cyanoacrylate liquid skin protectant: An integrated experimental-computational study.

Authors:  Raz Margi; Amit Gefen
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2021-08-17       Impact factor: 3.315

8.  Explainable Artificial Intelligence for Predicting Hospital-Acquired Pressure Injuries in COVID-19-Positive Critical Care Patients.

Authors:  Jenny Alderden; Susan M Kennerly; Andrew Wilson; Jonathan Dimas; Casey McFarland; David Y Yap; Lucy Zhao; Tracey L Yap
Journal:  Comput Inform Nurs       Date:  2022-10-01       Impact factor: 2.146

9.  The prevalence of facial pressure injuries among nurses during COVID-19 pandemic and its relationship to COVID-19 infection.

Authors:  Özge Uçar; Sevim Çeli K; Emrah Altun; Elif Karahan
Journal:  J Tissue Viability       Date:  2022-09-29       Impact factor: 3.374

10.  Systematic review: Incidence and prevalence of mucous membrane pressure injury in adults admitted to acute hospital settings.

Authors:  Paul Fulbrook; Josephine Lovegrove; Sandra Miles; Ban Isaqi
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2021-06-14       Impact factor: 3.315

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.