PURPOSE: The primary purposes of this study were to examine the effects of hearing loss and respondent type (self- vs. parent-proxy report) on subjective fatigue in children. We also examined associations between child-specific factors and fatigue ratings. METHOD: Subjective fatigue was assessed using the Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory Multidimensional Fatigue Scale (PedsQL-MFS; Varni, Burwinkle, Katz, Meeske, & Dickinson, 2002). We compared self- and parent-proxy ratings from 60 children with hearing loss (CHL) and 43 children with normal hearing (CNH). The children ranged in age from 6 to 12 years. RESULTS: School-age CHL experienced more overall and cognitive fatigue than CNH, although the differences were smaller than previously reported. Parent-proxy report was not strongly associated with child self-report, and parents tended to underestimate their child's fatigue, particularly sleep/rest fatigue. Language ability was also associated with subjective fatigue. For CHL and CNH, as language abilities increased, cognitive fatigue decreased. CONCLUSIONS: School-age CHL experience more subjective fatigue than CNH. The poor association between parent-proxy and child reports suggests that the parent-proxy version of the PedsQL-MFS should not be used in isolation when assessing fatigue in school-age children. Future research should examine how language abilities may modulate fatigue and its potential academic consequences in CHL.
PURPOSE: The primary purposes of this study were to examine the effects of hearing loss and respondent type (self- vs. parent-proxy report) on subjective fatigue in children. We also examined associations between child-specific factors and fatigue ratings. METHOD: Subjective fatigue was assessed using the Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory Multidimensional Fatigue Scale (PedsQL-MFS; Varni, Burwinkle, Katz, Meeske, & Dickinson, 2002). We compared self- and parent-proxy ratings from 60 children with hearing loss (CHL) and 43 children with normal hearing (CNH). The children ranged in age from 6 to 12 years. RESULTS: School-age CHL experienced more overall and cognitive fatigue than CNH, although the differences were smaller than previously reported. Parent-proxy report was not strongly associated with child self-report, and parents tended to underestimate their child's fatigue, particularly sleep/rest fatigue. Language ability was also associated with subjective fatigue. For CHL and CNH, as language abilities increased, cognitive fatigue decreased. CONCLUSIONS: School-age CHL experience more subjective fatigue than CNH. The poor association between parent-proxy and child reports suggests that the parent-proxy version of the PedsQL-MFS should not be used in isolation when assessing fatigue in school-age children. Future research should examine how language abilities may modulate fatigue and its potential academic consequences in CHL.
Authors: Ronan McGarrigle; Kevin J Munro; Piers Dawes; Andrew J Stewart; David R Moore; Johanna G Barry; Sygal Amitay Journal: Int J Audiol Date: 2014-03-27 Impact factor: 2.117
Authors: M Suzanne Gordijn; M Suzanne Gordijn; Eline M P Cremers; Gertjan J L Kaspers; Reinoud J B J Gemke Journal: Qual Life Res Date: 2011-01-19 Impact factor: 4.147
Authors: Odile H Clavier; James A Norris; David W Hinckley; William Hal Martin; Shi Yuan Lee; Sigfrid D Soli; Douglas S Brungart; Jaclyn R Schurman; Erik Larsen; Golbarg Mehraei; Tera M Quigley Journal: J Acoust Soc Am Date: 2022-07 Impact factor: 2.482
Authors: Samantha J Gustafson; Alexandra P Key; Benjamin W Y Hornsby; Fred H Bess Journal: J Speech Lang Hear Res Date: 2018-04-17 Impact factor: 2.297
Authors: C Alves; M Lysenko; G A Tomlinson; J Donovan; U G Narayanan; B M Feldman; J G Wright Journal: J Child Orthop Date: 2019-10-01 Impact factor: 1.548
Authors: Robert T Dwyer; René H Gifford; Fred H Bess; Michael Dorman; Anthony Spahr; Benjamin W Y Hornsby Journal: Am J Audiol Date: 2019-08-20 Impact factor: 1.493