| Literature DB >> 29049349 |
Peng Dang1,2, Xuan Yu1, Hien Le1, Jinliang Liu1, Zhen Shen1, Zhong Zhao1,2.
Abstract
The effects of Chinese pine (Pinus tabuliformis) on sEntities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 29049349 PMCID: PMC5648195 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0186501
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Fig 1Map of the study sites located in the Caijiachuan forest area of Huanglong county on the Loess Plateau.
The basic conditions of the forests and abandoned farmland sites.
| Stand sites | Age | Mean DBH | Canopy closure (%) | Shrubs | Herbs Coverage (%) | Slope aspect | Gradient | Altitude |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BL | - | - | - | - | 55.2 | 260° | 16.5° | 1296 |
| PF1 | 15 | 6.3 | 52.5 | 10.2 | 62.5 | 275° | 15.0° | 1430 |
| PF2 | 29 | 11.8 | 82.2 | 35.6 | 28.8 | 235° | 12.5° | 1499 |
| PF3 | 55 | 21.2 | 78.6 | 40.3 | 22.2 | 325° | 18.0° | 1321 |
| NSF | 80 | 29.4 | 70.8 | 32.5 | 18.3 | 265° | 20.5° | 1283 |
BL, PF1, PF2, PF3 and NSF represent abandoned land, 12-year-old plantation forest, 29-year-old forest, 53-year-old plantations forest and NSF with an age of almost 80 years, respectively.
Soil physicochemical characteristics of forest and abandoned land of different ages.
| BL | PF1 | PF2 | PF3 | NSF | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| pH | 8.23±0.03 | 8.20±0.04 | 8.21±0.07 | 8.20±0.03 | 8.19±0.02 |
| SOC(g/kg) | 12.83±0.75c | 17.97±1.40b | 20.33±2.80ab | 20.00±1.31ab | 21.90±0.80a |
| TN(g/kg) | 1.02±0.03b | 1.20±0.02a | 1.29±0.08a | 1.23±0.09a | 1.27±0.045a |
| TP(g/kg) | 0.58±0.01 | 0.56±0.04 | 0.60±0.08 | 0.57±0.01 | 0.56±0.01 |
| C:N | 12.58±0.62c | 15.02±0.63b | 15.63±1.20ab | 16.29±1.10ab | 17.21±0.57a |
| NH4+-N(mg/kg) | 3.35±0.18b | 3.90±0.11b | 3.68±0.68b | 3.94±0.61b | 5.14±0.46a |
| NO3--N(mg/kg) | 1.13±0.12b | 1.30±0.08b | 1.17±0.06b | 1.60±0.16a | 1.72±0.43a |
| AP(mg/kg) | 11.28±0.21a | 9.73±1.21b | 9.51±0.13b | 9.15±0.61b | 8.81±2.56b |
| SWC(%) | 10.27%±0.12% | 11.26%±0.39% | 10.84±0.73% | 11.26%±0.55% | 11.03%±0.16% |
| BD(g/cm3) | 1.18±0.06a | 1.14±0.06a | 1.12±0.10a | 0.83±0.05b | 0.94±0.08b |
Lowercase letters indicate significant differences (P<0.05) among the five sample stands. SOC, soil organic carbon; TN, soil total nitrogen; TP, soil total phosphorus; C: N, soil organic carbon and total nitrogen ratio; NH4+-N, ammonium nitrogen; NO3--N, nitrate nitrogen; AP, available phosphorus; SWC, soil water content; BD, soil bulk density.
Fig 2Shannon index and Simpson index of bacterial (a) and fungal (b) communities in plantation stands of different ages and abandoned farmland.
Fig 3PCoA for soil bacterial (a) and fungal (b) communities from forest sites (PF1, PF2, PF3, NSF) and abandoned land (BL).
Fig 4Mean relative abundances of dominant bacterial phyla across all different sites.
Different letters indicate signiFIcant differences (P<0.05) across the different sample sites. NS: not significant.
Fig 5Mean relative abundances of dominant fungal phyla across all different sites.
Different letters indicate significant differences (P<0.05) across the different sample sites.
Fig 6RDA of abundant bacterial communities at the order level and soil chemical properties for soil samples from abandoned farmland and Chinese pine forests.
Fig 7RDA of the dominant fungal communities at the order level and soil chemical properties for soil samples from abandoned land and Chinese pine forests.