| Literature DB >> 29044728 |
Julia Koehler Leman1,2, Andrew R D'Avino1,3, Yash Bhatnagar1, Jeffrey J Gray1.
Abstract
Membrane proteins are challenging to study and restraints for structure determination are typically sparse or of low resolution because the membrane environment that surrounds them leads to a variety of experimental challenges. When membrane protein structures are determined by different techniques in different environments, a natural question is "which structure is most biologically relevant?" Towards answering this question, we compiled a dataset of membrane proteins with known structures determined by both solution NMR and X-ray crystallography. By investigating differences between the structures, we found that RMSDs between crystal and NMR structures are below 5 Å in the membrane region, NMR ensembles have a higher convergence in the membrane region, crystal structures typically have a straighter transmembrane region, have higher stereo-chemical correctness, and are more tightly packed. After quantifying these differences, we used high-resolution refinement of the NMR structures to mitigate them, which paves the way for identifying and improving the structural quality of membrane proteins.Entities:
Keywords: Rosetta software; membrane proteins; protein modeling; protein structure; structural quality; structure refinement
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 29044728 PMCID: PMC5790426 DOI: 10.1002/prot.25402
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Proteins ISSN: 0887-3585