Robert R McWilliams1, Jacob B Allred2, Jessica A Slostad3, Rajini Katipamula4, Roxana S Dronca1, Kandelaria M Rumilla5, Lori A Erickson6, Alan H Bryce7, Richard W Joseph8, Lisa A Kottschade1, David M King9, John M Leitch10, Svetomir N Markovic1. 1. Division of Medical Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota. 2. Alliance Statistics and Data Center, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota. 3. Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota. 4. Minnesota Oncology, Coon Rapids, Minnesota. 5. Division of Molecular Genetics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota. 6. Division of Anatomic Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota. 7. Division of Hematology/Oncology, Mayo Clinic in Arizona, Scottsdale, Arizona. 8. Division of Hematology/Oncology, Mayo Clinic in Florida, Jacksonville, Florida. 9. Unity Hospital, Metro Minnesota Community Oncology Research Consortium, Saint Louis Park, Minnesota. 10. Sanford Clinic North-Fargo, Fargo, North Dakota.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Despite the success of immune checkpoint and targeted therapy, many patients with melanoma ultimately require further treatment. The combination of carboplatin, paclitaxel, and bevacizumab (CPB) has demonstrated promising activity in a single-arm study. In the current study, the authors performed a randomized phase 2 study to confirm efficacy and to determine whether adding everolimus would increase the activity of the combination. METHODS: Through the North Central Cancer Treatment Group, a total of 149 patients with unresectable AJCC 6th edition stage IV melanoma were randomized from May 2010 to May 2014 to either CPB or CPB with everolimus (CPBE). The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS), with secondary endpoints of overall survival (OS), response rate, and tolerability. RESULTS: The CPB and CPBE treatment arms were balanced with regard to age (median age: 59 years vs 58 years) and high lactate dehydrogenase (48% vs 51%), but were unbalanced with regard to sex (male sex: 72% vs 55%; P = .03). Overall, there was no difference noted with regard to PFS, with a median PFS of 5.6 months for CPB versus 5.1 months for CPBE (hazard ratio [HR], 1.14; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 0.81-1.62 [P = .44]), or for OS, with a median OS of 14.5 months for CPB versus 10.8 months for CPBE (HR, 1.16; 95% CI, 0.84-1.84). The confirmed response rate was 13% for CPB and 23% for CPBE (P = .13). Toxicity was higher for CPBE compared with CPB (83% for grade 3 + and 14% for grade 4 + vs 63% for grade 3 + and 11% for grade 4+, respectively) (toxicities were graded using the Cancer Therapy Evaluation Program of the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events [version 4.0]). Common grade 3 + toxicities were neutropenia, leukopenia, and fatigue, which occurred in both treatment arms with comparable frequency. CONCLUSIONS: Both experimental arms demonstrated activity, with a PFS of >5 months. However, the addition of everolimus to CPB failed to improve outcomes, with increased toxicity noted. These findings replicate the moderate antitumor activity of CPB, with future development possibly in combination with targeted or immunotherapy. Cancer 2018;124:537-45.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: Despite the success of immune checkpoint and targeted therapy, many patients with melanoma ultimately require further treatment. The combination of carboplatin, paclitaxel, and bevacizumab (CPB) has demonstrated promising activity in a single-arm study. In the current study, the authors performed a randomized phase 2 study to confirm efficacy and to determine whether adding everolimus would increase the activity of the combination. METHODS: Through the North Central Cancer Treatment Group, a total of 149 patients with unresectable AJCC 6th edition stage IV melanoma were randomized from May 2010 to May 2014 to either CPB or CPB with everolimus (CPBE). The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS), with secondary endpoints of overall survival (OS), response rate, and tolerability. RESULTS: The CPB and CPBE treatment arms were balanced with regard to age (median age: 59 years vs 58 years) and high lactate dehydrogenase (48% vs 51%), but were unbalanced with regard to sex (male sex: 72% vs 55%; P = .03). Overall, there was no difference noted with regard to PFS, with a median PFS of 5.6 months for CPB versus 5.1 months for CPBE (hazard ratio [HR], 1.14; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 0.81-1.62 [P = .44]), or for OS, with a median OS of 14.5 months for CPB versus 10.8 months for CPBE (HR, 1.16; 95% CI, 0.84-1.84). The confirmed response rate was 13% for CPB and 23% for CPBE (P = .13). Toxicity was higher for CPBE compared with CPB (83% for grade 3 + and 14% for grade 4 + vs 63% for grade 3 + and 11% for grade 4+, respectively) (toxicities were graded using the Cancer Therapy Evaluation Program of the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events [version 4.0]). Common grade 3 + toxicities were neutropenia, leukopenia, and fatigue, which occurred in both treatment arms with comparable frequency. CONCLUSIONS: Both experimental arms demonstrated activity, with a PFS of >5 months. However, the addition of everolimus to CPB failed to improve outcomes, with increased toxicity noted. These findings replicate the moderate antitumor activity of CPB, with future development possibly in combination with targeted or immunotherapy. Cancer 2018;124:537-45.
Authors: Caroline Robert; Boguslawa Karaszewska; Jacob Schachter; Piotr Rutkowski; Andrzej Mackiewicz; Daniil Stroiakovski; Michael Lichinitser; Reinhard Dummer; Florent Grange; Laurent Mortier; Vanna Chiarion-Sileni; Kamil Drucis; Ivana Krajsova; Axel Hauschild; Paul Lorigan; Pascal Wolter; Georgina V Long; Keith Flaherty; Paul Nathan; Antoni Ribas; Anne-Marie Martin; Peng Sun; Wendy Crist; Jeff Legos; Stephen D Rubin; Shonda M Little; Dirk Schadendorf Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2014-11-16 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Ravi D Rao; Shernan G Holtan; James N Ingle; Gary A Croghan; Lisa A Kottschade; Edward T Creagan; Judith S Kaur; Henry C Pitot; Svetomir N Markovic Journal: Cancer Date: 2006-01-15 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: James G Greger; Stephen D Eastman; Vivian Zhang; Maureen R Bleam; Ashley M Hughes; Kimberly N Smitheman; Scott H Dickerson; Sylvie G Laquerre; Li Liu; Tona M Gilmer Journal: Mol Cancer Ther Date: 2012-03-02 Impact factor: 6.261
Authors: John D Hainsworth; Jeffrey R Infante; David R Spigel; James D Peyton; Dana S Thompson; Cassie M Lane; Bobby L Clark; Mark S Rubin; David F Trent; Howard A Burris Journal: Cancer Date: 2010-09-01 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: C M Balch; S J Soong; J E Gershenwald; J F Thompson; D S Reintgen; N Cascinelli; M Urist; K M McMasters; M I Ross; J M Kirkwood; M B Atkins; J A Thompson; D G Coit; D Byrd; R Desmond; Y Zhang; P Y Liu; G H Lyman; A Morabito Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2001-08-15 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: S Huber; C J Bruns; G Schmid; P C Hermann; C Conrad; H Niess; R Huss; C Graeb; K-W Jauch; C Heeschen; M Guba Journal: Kidney Int Date: 2007-02-14 Impact factor: 10.612
Authors: Smita S Chandran; Robert P T Somerville; James C Yang; Richard M Sherry; Christopher A Klebanoff; Stephanie L Goff; John R Wunderlich; David N Danforth; Daniel Zlott; Biman C Paria; Arvind C Sabesan; Abhishek K Srivastava; Liqiang Xi; Trinh H Pham; Mark Raffeld; Donald E White; Mary Ann Toomey; Steven A Rosenberg; Udai S Kammula Journal: Lancet Oncol Date: 2017-04-07 Impact factor: 41.316
Authors: Brian A Costello; Mitesh J Borad; Yingwei Qi; George P Kim; Donald W Northfelt; Charles Erlichman; Steven R Alberts Journal: Invest New Drugs Date: 2014-04-18 Impact factor: 3.850
Authors: Jesus Vera Aguilera; Ravi D Rao; Jacob B Allred; Vera J Suman; Harold E Windschitl; Judith S Kaur; William J Maples; Val J Lowe; Edward T Creagan; Lori A Erickson; Svetomir Markovic Journal: Oncologist Date: 2018-04-17
Authors: Jessica A Slostad; Minetta C Liu; Jacob B Allred; Lori A Erickson; Kandelaria M Rumilla; Matthew S Block; Michael Keppen; David King; Svetomir N Markovic; Robert R McWilliams Journal: Mayo Clin Proc Innov Qual Outcomes Date: 2021-10-13
Authors: Jacob J Orme; Elizabeth Ann L Enninga; Fabrice Lucien-Matteoni; Heather Dale; Edwin Burgstaler; Susan M Harrington; Matthew K Ball; Aaron S Mansfield; Sean S Park; Mathew S Block; Svetomir N Markovic; Yiyi Yan; Haidong Dong; Roxana S Dronca; Jeffrey L Winters Journal: J Immunother Cancer Date: 2020-08 Impact factor: 12.469