Literature DB >> 11504744

Prognostic factors analysis of 17,600 melanoma patients: validation of the American Joint Committee on Cancer melanoma staging system.

C M Balch1, S J Soong, J E Gershenwald, J F Thompson, D S Reintgen, N Cascinelli, M Urist, K M McMasters, M I Ross, J M Kirkwood, M B Atkins, J A Thompson, D G Coit, D Byrd, R Desmond, Y Zhang, P Y Liu, G H Lyman, A Morabito.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) recently proposed major revisions of the tumor-node-metastases (TNM) categories and stage groupings for cutaneous melanoma. Thirteen cancer centers and cancer cooperative groups contributed staging and survival data from a total of 30,450 melanoma patients from their databases in order to validate this staging proposal. PATIENTS AND METHODS: There were 17,600 melanoma patients with complete clinical, pathologic, and follow-up information. Factors predicting melanoma-specific survival rates were analyzed using the Cox proportional hazards regression model. Follow-up survival data for 5 years or longer were available for 73% of the patients.
RESULTS: This analysis demonstrated that (1) in the T category, tumor thickness and ulceration were the most powerful predictors of survival, and the level of invasion had a significant impact only within the subgroup of thin (< or = 1 mm) melanomas; (2) in the N category, the following three independent factors were identified: the number of metastatic nodes, whether nodal metastases were clinically occult or clinically apparent, and the presence or absence of primary tumor ulceration; and (3) in the M category, nonvisceral metastases was associated with a better survival compared with visceral metastases. A marked diversity in the natural history of pathologic stage III melanoma was demonstrated by five-fold differences in 5-year survival rates for defined subgroups. This analysis also demonstrated that large and complex data sets could be used effectively to examine prognosis and survival outcome in melanoma patients.
CONCLUSION: The results of this evidence-based methodology were incorporated into the AJCC melanoma staging as described in the companion publication.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11504744     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2001.19.16.3622

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  453 in total

1.  MMP2 expression is a prognostic marker for primary melanoma patients.

Authors:  Anand Rotte; Magdalena Martinka; Gang Li
Journal:  Cell Oncol (Dordr)       Date:  2012-06-06       Impact factor: 6.730

2.  Long-term survival in patients with metastatic melanoma treated with DTIC or temozolomide.

Authors:  Christina Kim; Christopher W Lee; Laurel Kovacic; Amil Shah; Richard Klasa; Kerry J Savage
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2010-06-10

3.  Sentinel lymph node biopsy for cutaneous melanoma: results of 10 years' experience in two regional training hospitals in the Netherlands.

Authors:  Frank J van den Broek; Pim C Sloots; Jan-Willem D de Waard; Rudi M Roumen
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2012-03-09       Impact factor: 3.402

4.  Prognostic significance of mitotic rate in localized primary cutaneous melanoma: an analysis of patients in the multi-institutional American Joint Committee on Cancer melanoma staging database.

Authors:  John F Thompson; Seng-Jaw Soong; Charles M Balch; Jeffrey E Gershenwald; Shouluan Ding; Daniel G Coit; Keith T Flaherty; Phyllis A Gimotty; Timothy Johnson; Marcella M Johnson; Stanley P Leong; Merrick I Ross; David R Byrd; Natale Cascinelli; Alistair J Cochran; Alexander M Eggermont; Kelly M McMasters; Martin C Mihm; Donald L Morton; Vernon K Sondak
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2011-04-25       Impact factor: 44.544

5.  Gender-related differences in outcome for melanoma patients.

Authors:  Charles R Scoggins; Merrick I Ross; Douglas S Reintgen; R Dirk Noyes; James S Goydos; Peter D Beitsch; Marshall M Urist; Stephan Ariyan; Jeffrey J Sussman; Michael J Edwards; Anees B Chagpar; Robert C G Martin; Arnold J Stromberg; Lee Hagendoorn; Kelly M McMasters
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 6.  Melanoma in immunosuppressed patients.

Authors:  Agnieszka W Kubica; Jerry D Brewer
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 7.616

7.  Clinicopathological Features, Staging, and Current Approaches to Treatment in High-Risk Resectable Melanoma.

Authors:  Emily Z Keung; Jeffrey E Gershenwald
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2020-09-01       Impact factor: 13.506

8.  Routine use of FDG-PET scans in melanoma patients with positive sentinel node biopsy.

Authors:  Janne Horn; Jørgen Lock-Andersen; Helle Sjøstrand; Annika Loft
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2006-04-04       Impact factor: 9.236

9.  Long-term follow-up and survival of patients following a recurrence of melanoma after a negative sentinel lymph node biopsy result.

Authors:  Edward L Jones; Teresa S Jones; Nathan W Pearlman; Dexiang Gao; Robert Stovall; Csaba Gajdos; Nicole Kounalakis; Rene Gonzalez; Karl D Lewis; William A Robinson; Martin D McCarter
Journal:  JAMA Surg       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 14.766

10.  One hundred consecutive isolated limb perfusions with TNF-alpha and melphalan in melanoma patients with multiple in-transit metastases.

Authors:  Dirk J Grünhagen; Flavia Brunstein; Wilfried J Graveland; Albertus N van Geel; Johannes H W de Wilt; Alexander M M Eggermont
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 12.969

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.