BACKGROUND: Uveal melanoma is a rare tumour with no established treatments once metastases develop. Although a variety of immune-based therapies have shown efficacy in metastatic cutaneous melanoma, their use in ocular variants has been disappointing. Recently, adoptive T-cell therapy has shown salvage responses in multiple refractory solid tumours. Thus, we sought to determine if adoptive transfer of autologous tumour-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) could mediate regression of metastatic uveal melanoma. METHODS: In this ongoing single-centre, two-stage, phase 2, single-arm trial, patients (aged ≥16 years) with histologically confirmed metastatic ocular melanoma were enrolled. Key eligibility criteria were an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 or 1, progressive metastatic disease, and adequate haematological, renal, and hepatic function. Metastasectomies were done to procure tumour tissue to generate autologous TIL cultures, which then underwent large scale ex-vivo expansion. Patients were treated with lymphodepleting conditioning chemotherapy (intravenous cyclophosphamide [60 mg/kg] daily for 2 days followed by fludarabine [25 mg/m2] daily for 5 days, followed by a single intravenous infusion of autologous TILs and high-dose interleukin-2 [720 000 IU/kg] every 8 h). The primary endpoint was objective tumour response in evaluable patients per protocol using Response to Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors, version 1.0. An interim analysis of this trial is reported here. The trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01814046. FINDINGS: From the completed first stage and ongoing expansion stage of this trial, a total of 21 consecutive patients with metastatic uveal melanoma were enrolled between June 7, 2013, and Sept 9, 2016, and received TIL therapy. Seven (35%, 95% CI 16-59) of 20 evaluable patients had objective tumour regression. Among the responders, six patients achieved a partial response, two of which are ongoing and have not reached maximum response. One patient achieved complete response of numerous hepatic metastases, currently ongoing at 21 months post therapy. Three of the responders were refractory to previous immune checkpoint blockade. Common grade 3 or worse toxic effects were related to the lymphodepleting chemotherapy regimen and included lymphopenia, neutropenia, and thrombocytopenia (21 [100%] patients for each toxicity); anaemia (14 [67%] patients); and infection (six [29%] patients). There was one treatment-related death secondary to sepsis-induced multiorgan failure. INTERPRETATION: To our knowledge, this is the first report describing adoptive transfer of autologous TILs to mediate objective tumour regression in patients with metastatic uveal melanoma. These initial results challenge the belief that metastatic uveal melanoma is immunotherapy resistant and support the further investigation of immune-based therapies for this cancer. Refinement of this T-cell therapy is crucial to improve the frequency of clinical responses and the general applicability of this treatment modality. FUNDING: Intramural Research Program of the National Institutes of Health, National Cancer Institute, Center for Cancer Research.
BACKGROUND:Uveal melanoma is a rare tumour with no established treatments once metastases develop. Although a variety of immune-based therapies have shown efficacy in metastatic cutaneous melanoma, their use in ocular variants has been disappointing. Recently, adoptive T-cell therapy has shown salvage responses in multiple refractory solid tumours. Thus, we sought to determine if adoptive transfer of autologous tumour-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) could mediate regression of metastatic uveal melanoma. METHODS: In this ongoing single-centre, two-stage, phase 2, single-arm trial, patients (aged ≥16 years) with histologically confirmed metastatic ocular melanoma were enrolled. Key eligibility criteria were an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 or 1, progressive metastatic disease, and adequate haematological, renal, and hepatic function. Metastasectomies were done to procure tumour tissue to generate autologous TIL cultures, which then underwent large scale ex-vivo expansion. Patients were treated with lymphodepleting conditioning chemotherapy (intravenous cyclophosphamide [60 mg/kg] daily for 2 days followed by fludarabine [25 mg/m2] daily for 5 days, followed by a single intravenous infusion of autologous TILs and high-dose interleukin-2 [720 000 IU/kg] every 8 h). The primary endpoint was objective tumour response in evaluable patients per protocol using Response to Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors, version 1.0. An interim analysis of this trial is reported here. The trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01814046. FINDINGS: From the completed first stage and ongoing expansion stage of this trial, a total of 21 consecutive patients with metastatic uveal melanoma were enrolled between June 7, 2013, and Sept 9, 2016, and received TIL therapy. Seven (35%, 95% CI 16-59) of 20 evaluable patients had objective tumour regression. Among the responders, six patients achieved a partial response, two of which are ongoing and have not reached maximum response. One patient achieved complete response of numerous hepatic metastases, currently ongoing at 21 months post therapy. Three of the responders were refractory to previous immune checkpoint blockade. Common grade 3 or worse toxic effects were related to the lymphodepleting chemotherapy regimen and included lymphopenia, neutropenia, and thrombocytopenia (21 [100%] patients for each toxicity); anaemia (14 [67%] patients); and infection (six [29%] patients). There was one treatment-related death secondary to sepsis-induced multiorgan failure. INTERPRETATION: To our knowledge, this is the first report describing adoptive transfer of autologous TILs to mediate objective tumour regression in patients with metastatic uveal melanoma. These initial results challenge the belief that metastatic uveal melanoma is immunotherapy resistant and support the further investigation of immune-based therapies for this cancer. Refinement of this T-cell therapy is crucial to improve the frequency of clinical responses and the general applicability of this treatment modality. FUNDING: Intramural Research Program of the National Institutes of Health, National Cancer Institute, Center for Cancer Research.
Authors: Luke D Rothermel; Arvind C Sabesan; Daniel J Stephens; Smita S Chandran; Biman C Paria; Abhishek K Srivastava; Robert Somerville; John R Wunderlich; Chyi-Chia R Lee; Liqiang Xi; Trinh H Pham; Mark Raffeld; Parthav Jailwala; Manjula Kasoji; Udai S Kammula Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2015-12-28 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Steven A Rosenberg; James C Yang; Richard M Sherry; Udai S Kammula; Marybeth S Hughes; Giao Q Phan; Deborah E Citrin; Nicholas P Restifo; Paul F Robbins; John R Wunderlich; Kathleen E Morton; Carolyn M Laurencot; Seth M Steinberg; Donald E White; Mark E Dudley Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2011-04-15 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: J William Harbour; Michael D Onken; Elisha D O Roberson; Shenghui Duan; Li Cao; Lori A Worley; M Laurin Council; Katie A Matatall; Cynthia Helms; Anne M Bowcock Journal: Science Date: 2010-11-04 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: Colleen C McLaughlin; Xiao-Cheng Wu; Ahmedin Jemal; Howard J Martin; Lisa M Roche; Vivien W Chen Journal: Cancer Date: 2005-03-01 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Roy S Herbst; Jean-Charles Soria; Marcin Kowanetz; Gregg D Fine; Omid Hamid; Michael S Gordon; Jeffery A Sosman; David F McDermott; John D Powderly; Scott N Gettinger; Holbrook E K Kohrt; Leora Horn; Donald P Lawrence; Sandra Rost; Maya Leabman; Yuanyuan Xiao; Ahmad Mokatrin; Hartmut Koeppen; Priti S Hegde; Ira Mellman; Daniel S Chen; F Stephen Hodi Journal: Nature Date: 2014-11-27 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: Catherine D Van Raamsdonk; Klaus G Griewank; Michelle B Crosby; Maria C Garrido; Swapna Vemula; Thomas Wiesner; Anna C Obenauf; Werner Wackernagel; Gary Green; Nancy Bouvier; M Mert Sozen; Gail Baimukanova; Ritu Roy; Adriana Heguy; Igor Dolgalev; Raya Khanin; Klaus Busam; Michael R Speicher; Joan O'Brien; Boris C Bastian Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2010-11-17 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Eric Tran; Simon Turcotte; Alena Gros; Paul F Robbins; Yong-Chen Lu; Mark E Dudley; John R Wunderlich; Robert P Somerville; Katherine Hogan; Christian S Hinrichs; Maria R Parkhurst; James C Yang; Steven A Rosenberg Journal: Science Date: 2014-05-09 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: Yong-Chen Lu; Xin Yao; Jessica S Crystal; Yong F Li; Mona El-Gamil; Colin Gross; Lindy Davis; Mark E Dudley; James C Yang; Yardena Samuels; Steven A Rosenberg; Paul F Robbins Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2014-07-01 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Fei Yi; Nicholas Frazzette; Anthony C Cruz; Christopher A Klebanoff; Richard M Siegel Journal: Trends Mol Med Date: 2018-06-04 Impact factor: 11.951
Authors: Jason J Luke; Daniel J Olson; Jacob B Allred; Carrie A Strand; Riyue Bao; Yuanyuan Zha; Timothy Carll; Brian W Labadie; Bruno R Bastos; Marcus O Butler; David Hogg; Pamela N Munster; Gary K Schwartz Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2019-09-26 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: J William Harbour; Manuel Paez-Escamilla; Louis Cai; Scott D Walter; James J Augsburger; Zelia M Correa Journal: Am J Ophthalmol Date: 2018-09-07 Impact factor: 5.258
Authors: René J Tavera; Marie-Andrée Forget; Young Uk Kim; Donastas Sakellariou-Thompson; Caitlin A Creasy; Ankit Bhatta; Orenthial J Fulbright; Renjith Ramachandran; Shawne T Thorsen; Esteban Flores; Arely Wahl; Audrey M Gonzalez; Christopher Toth; Seth Wardell; Rahmatu Mansaray; Laszlo G Radvanyi; Dan S Gombos; Sapna P Patel; Patrick Hwu; Rodabe N Amaria; Chantale Bernatchez; Cara Haymaker Journal: J Immunother Date: 2018 Nov/Dec Impact factor: 4.456