| Literature DB >> 29041962 |
Maarten Eldering1, Anaïs Bompard2, Kazutoyo Miura3, Will Stone1, Isabelle Morlais4, Anna Cohuet4, Geert-Jan van Gemert1, Patrick M Brock2,5, Sanna R Rijpma1, Marga van de Vegte-Bolmer1, Wouter Graumans1, Rianne Siebelink-Stoter1, Dari F Da6, Carole A Long3, Merribeth J Morin7, Robert W Sauerwein1, Thomas S Churcher2, Teun Bousema8,9.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: With the increasing interest in vaccines to interrupt malaria transmission, there is a demand for harmonization of current methods to assess Plasmodium transmission in laboratory settings. Potential vaccine candidates are currently tested in the standard membrane feeding assay (SMFA) that commonly relies on Anopheles stephensi mosquitoes. Other mosquito species including Anopheles gambiae are the dominant malaria vectors for Plasmodium falciparum in sub-Saharan Africa.Entities:
Keywords: Anopheles; Immunity; Malaria; Transmission; Vaccine
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 29041962 PMCID: PMC5646129 DOI: 10.1186/s13071-017-2414-z
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Parasit Vectors ISSN: 1756-3305 Impact factor: 3.876
Fig. 1Prevalence and oocyst intensity in An. stephensi and An. gambiae mosquitoes. a Mean oocysts intensity (dots) with 95% confidence intervals (lines) in An. gambiae depending on mean oocyst intensity with 95% confidence intervals for An. stephensi, for control groups (grey), mAb Pfs48/45-85RF45.1 (blue), mAb Pfs48/45-85RF45.5 (red), mAb Pfs25-32F81 (green) and mAb Pfs25-4B7 (black). b Mean prevalence in oocysts (dots) with 95% confidence intervals (lines) in An. gambiae depending on mean prevalence with 95% confidence intervals for An. stephensi. Same color codes as for panel a. c Relationship between oocysts prevalence and intensity for An. stephensi (blue) and An. gambiae (green). The line and shaded area represent the predicted relationship and predicted confidence interval. Each data point represents the mean oocyst intensity and oocyst prevalence in a single group of mosquitoes. The size of each data point represents the size of the mosquito group analyzed. Data were collected from both control and experimental feeds between 6 and 9 days post infection. In total 1635 separate feedings comprising 25,574 mosquito dissections are shown: 150 feeds with An. gambiae (green) comprising 2691 mosquitoes and 1485 feeds with An. stephensi (blue) comprising 22,883 mosquitoes
Fig. 2The ranking of estimates of TRA of antibodies against Pfs48/45 (mAb 85RF45.1 and mAb 85RF45.5) and Pfs25 (mAb 32F81 and mAb 4B7) in An. gambiae and An. stephensi mosquitoes. TRA of transmission effective mAb 85RF45.1 (blue), 85RF45.5 (red), 32F81 (green) and 4B7 (black) in An. gambiae depending on TRA in An. stephensi mosquitoes. Dots and triangles represent the predicted TRA, while lines represent 95% confidence intervals in An. gambiae and An. stephensi
Fig. 3TRA of antibodies against Pfs48/45 (mAb 85RF45.1 and mAb 85RF45.5) and Pfs25 (mAb 32F81 and mAb 4B7) in An. gambiae and An. stephensi mosquitoes. Figures show the estimates of TRA as relative reduction in oocyst intensity for each experiment (dots for An. gambiae experiments, triangles for An. stephensi experiments) and the GLMM model predictions and confidence intervals (lines and shaded areas). TRA of mAb in An. gambiae is shown in green and for An. stephensi it is shown in blue. a Relation between An. gambiae and An. stephensi for TRA of mAb 85RF45.1. b Relation between An. gambiae and An. stephensi for TRA of mAb 85RF45.5. c Relation between An. gambiae and An. stephensi for TRA of mAb 32F81. d Relation between An. gambiae and An. stephensi for TRA of mAb 4B7. All TRA calculations were made using human serum controls
Fig. 4TRA of human serum IgG from Cameroon and Burkina Faso and serum IgG from Dutch expatriate donor SP in An. gambiae and An. stephensi mosquitoes. All TRA calculations were made using FCS controls. TRA calculated using mean oocyst intensity assessments from oocyst intensity data from feeds with human serum IgG. R was calculated based on deviation from a perfect linear association (x = y)