Literature DB >> 29037587

Lipidomic analysis of biological samples: Comparison of liquid chromatography, supercritical fluid chromatography and direct infusion mass spectrometry methods.

Miroslav Lísa1, Eva Cífková2, Maria Khalikova2, Magdaléna Ovčačíková2, Michal Holčapek2.   

Abstract

Lipidomic analysis of biological samples in a clinical research represents challenging task for analytical methods given by the large number of samples and their extreme complexity. In this work, we compare direct infusion (DI) and chromatography - mass spectrometry (MS) lipidomic approaches represented by three analytical methods in terms of comprehensiveness, sample throughput, and validation results for the lipidomic analysis of biological samples represented by tumor tissue, surrounding normal tissue, plasma, and erythrocytes of kidney cancer patients. Methods are compared in one laboratory using the identical analytical protocol to ensure comparable conditions. Ultrahigh-performance liquid chromatography/MS (UHPLC/MS) method in hydrophilic interaction liquid chromatography mode and DI-MS method are used for this comparison as the most widely used methods for the lipidomic analysis together with ultrahigh-performance supercritical fluid chromatography/MS (UHPSFC/MS) method showing promising results in metabolomics analyses. The nontargeted analysis of pooled samples is performed using all tested methods and 610 lipid species within 23 lipid classes are identified. DI method provides the most comprehensive results due to identification of some polar lipid classes, which are not identified by UHPLC and UHPSFC methods. On the other hand, UHPSFC method provides an excellent sensitivity for less polar lipid classes and the highest sample throughput within 10min method time. The sample consumption of DI method is 125 times higher than for other methods, while only 40μL of organic solvent is used for one sample analysis compared to 3.5mL and 4.9mL in case of UHPLC and UHPSFC methods, respectively. Methods are validated for the quantitative lipidomic analysis of plasma samples with one internal standard for each lipid class. Results show applicability of all tested methods for the lipidomic analysis of biological samples depending on the analysis requirements.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Direct infusion; Lipidomic analysis; Lipidomics; Mass spectrometry; UHPLC; UHPSFC

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29037587     DOI: 10.1016/j.chroma.2017.10.022

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Chromatogr A        ISSN: 0021-9673            Impact factor:   4.759


  16 in total

1.  Ultrahigh-Performance capillary liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry at 35 kpsi for separation of lipids.

Authors:  Matthew J Sorensen; Kelsey E Miller; James W Jorgenson; Robert T Kennedy
Journal:  J Chromatogr A       Date:  2019-09-26       Impact factor: 4.759

2.  High Throughput Semiquantitative UHPSFC-MS/MS Lipid Profiling and Lipid Class Determination.

Authors:  Zdenka Bartosova; Susana Villa Gonzalez; André Voigt; Per Bruheim
Journal:  J Chromatogr Sci       Date:  2021-06-21       Impact factor: 1.618

3.  Methods of Lipidomic Analysis: Extraction, Derivatization, Separation, and Identification of Lipids.

Authors:  Ya Xie; Zongyuan Wu; Zuojian Qin; Bangfu Wu; Xin Lv; Fang Wei; Hong Chen
Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol       Date:  2021       Impact factor: 2.622

4.  Comprehensive Analysis of Plant Lipids Using Sub-2-μm Particle CO2-Based Chromatography Coupled to Mass Spectrometry.

Authors:  Carolina Salazar; Michael D Jones; Giorgis Isaac; Vladimir Shulaev
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2022

Review 5.  Advances of supercritical fluid chromatography in lipid profiling.

Authors:  Yang Yang; Yanshan Liang; Jina Yang; Fengying Ye; Ting Zhou; Li Gongke
Journal:  J Pharm Anal       Date:  2018-11-17

Review 6.  'Omics Approaches to Explore the Breast Cancer Landscape.

Authors:  Joseph Parsons; Chiara Francavilla
Journal:  Front Cell Dev Biol       Date:  2020-01-22

7.  Shared reference materials harmonize lipidomics across MS-based detection platforms and laboratories.

Authors:  Alexander Triebl; Bo Burla; Jayashree Selvalatchmanan; Jeongah Oh; Sock Hwee Tan; Mark Y Chan; Natalie A Mellet; Peter J Meikle; Federico Torta; Markus R Wenk
Journal:  J Lipid Res       Date:  2019-11-15       Impact factor: 5.922

8.  Ultra-Performance Liquid Chromatography-High-Resolution Mass Spectrometry and Direct Infusion-High-Resolution Mass Spectrometry for Combined Exploratory and Targeted Metabolic Profiling of Human Urine.

Authors:  Elena Chekmeneva; Gonçalo Dos Santos Correia; María Gómez-Romero; Jeremiah Stamler; Queenie Chan; Paul Elliott; Jeremy K Nicholson; Elaine Holmes
Journal:  J Proteome Res       Date:  2018-09-19       Impact factor: 4.466

Review 9.  Lipidomics from sample preparation to data analysis: a primer.

Authors:  Thomas Züllig; Martin Trötzmüller; Harald C Köfeler
Journal:  Anal Bioanal Chem       Date:  2019-12-10       Impact factor: 4.142

10.  Evaluation of lipid quantification accuracy using HILIC and RPLC MS on the example of NIST® SRM® 1950 metabolites in human plasma.

Authors:  Mike Lange; Maria Fedorova
Journal:  Anal Bioanal Chem       Date:  2020-04-02       Impact factor: 4.142

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.