Literature DB >> 29036474

CASAnova: a multiclass support vector machine model for the classification of human sperm motility patterns.

Summer G Goodson1, Sarah White2, Alicia M Stevans3, Sanjana Bhat3, Chia-Yu Kao2, Scott Jaworski1, Tamara R Marlowe1, Martin Kohlmeier1,4, Leonard McMillan2, Steven H Zeisel1,4, Deborah A O'Brien3.   

Abstract

The ability to accurately monitor alterations in sperm motility is paramount to understanding multiple genetic and biochemical perturbations impacting normal fertilization. Computer-aided sperm analysis (CASA) of human sperm typically reports motile percentage and kinematic parameters at the population level, and uses kinematic gating methods to identify subpopulations such as progressive or hyperactivated sperm. The goal of this study was to develop an automated method that classifies all patterns of human sperm motility during in vitro capacitation following the removal of seminal plasma. We visually classified CASA tracks of 2817 sperm from 18 individuals and used a support vector machine-based decision tree to compute four hyperplanes that separate five classes based on their kinematic parameters. We then developed a web-based program, CASAnova, which applies these equations sequentially to assign a single classification to each motile sperm. Vigorous sperm are classified as progressive, intermediate, or hyperactivated, and nonvigorous sperm as slow or weakly motile. This program correctly classifies sperm motility into one of five classes with an overall accuracy of 89.9%. Application of CASAnova to capacitating sperm populations showed a shift from predominantly linear patterns of motility at initial time points to more vigorous patterns, including hyperactivated motility, as capacitation proceeds. Both intermediate and hyperactivated motility patterns were largely eliminated when sperm were incubated in noncapacitating medium, demonstrating the sensitivity of this method. The five CASAnova classifications are distinctive and reflect kinetic parameters of washed human sperm, providing an accurate, quantitative, and high-throughput method for monitoring alterations in motility.
© The Authors 2017. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Society for the Study of Reproduction. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CASA; CASAnova; capacitation; hyperactivation; sperm motility; support vector machine

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29036474      PMCID: PMC6248632          DOI: 10.1093/biolre/iox120

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biol Reprod        ISSN: 0006-3363            Impact factor:   4.285


  63 in total

1.  A new objective method for scoring human sperm hyperactivation based on head axis angle deviation.

Authors:  F Mazzilli; T Rossi; M Delfino; F Dondero; A Makler
Journal:  Int J Androl       Date:  2001-08

Review 2.  Novel signaling pathways involved in sperm acquisition of fertilizing capacity.

Authors:  P E Visconti; V A Westbrook; O Chertihin; I Demarco; S Sleight; A B Diekman
Journal:  J Reprod Immunol       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 4.054

Review 3.  Machine learning: Trends, perspectives, and prospects.

Authors:  M I Jordan; T M Mitchell
Journal:  Science       Date:  2015-07-17       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Classification of mouse sperm motility patterns using an automated multiclass support vector machines model.

Authors:  Summer G Goodson; Zhaojun Zhang; James K Tsuruta; Wei Wang; Deborah A O'Brien
Journal:  Biol Reprod       Date:  2011-02-23       Impact factor: 4.285

5.  Performance of ten inbred mouse strains following assisted reproductive technologies (ARTs).

Authors:  Shannon L Byers; Suzan J Payson; Rob A Taft
Journal:  Theriogenology       Date:  2005-11-04       Impact factor: 2.740

6.  Definition of the optimal criteria for identifying hyperactivated human spermatozoa at 25 Hz using in-vitro fertilization as a functional end-point.

Authors:  N Sukcharoen; J Keith; D S Irvine; R J Aitken
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 6.918

7.  Male Infertility Is Responsible for Nearly Half of the Extinction Observed in the Mouse Collaborative Cross.

Authors:  John R Shorter; Fanny Odet; David L Aylor; Wenqi Pan; Chia-Yu Kao; Chen-Ping Fu; Andrew P Morgan; Seth Greenstein; Timothy A Bell; Alicia M Stevans; Ryan W Feathers; Sunny Patel; Sarah E Cates; Ginger D Shaw; Darla R Miller; Elissa J Chesler; Leonard McMillian; Deborah A O'Brien; Fernando Pardo-Manuel de Villena
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  Improved pregnancy rate in human in vitro fertilization with the use of a medium based on the composition of human tubal fluid.

Authors:  P Quinn; J F Kerin; G M Warnes
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  1985-10       Impact factor: 7.329

9.  In vitro fertilization and pregnancy rates: the influence of sperm motility and morphology on IVF outcome.

Authors:  E T Donnelly; S E Lewis; J A McNally; W Thompson
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 7.329

10.  Kinematics of capacitating human spermatozoa analysed at 60 Hz.

Authors:  S T Mortimer; M A Swan
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 6.918

View more
  8 in total

Review 1.  Automation in ART: Paving the Way for the Future of Infertility Treatment.

Authors:  Kadrina Abdul Latif Abdullah; Tomiris Atazhanova; Alejandro Chavez-Badiola; Sourima Biswas Shivhare
Journal:  Reprod Sci       Date:  2022-08-03       Impact factor: 2.924

2.  Engineering sperm-binding IgG antibodies for the development of an effective nonhormonal female contraception.

Authors:  Bhawana Shrestha; Alison Schaefer; Yong Zhu; Jamal Saada; Timothy M Jacobs; Elizabeth C Chavez; Stuart S Olmsted; Carlos A Cruz-Teran; Gabriela Baldeon Vaca; Kathleen Vincent; Thomas R Moench; Samuel K Lai
Journal:  Sci Transl Med       Date:  2021-08-11       Impact factor: 17.956

Review 3.  Machine learning for sperm selection.

Authors:  Jae Bem You; Christopher McCallum; Yihe Wang; Jason Riordon; Reza Nosrati; David Sinton
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2021-05-17       Impact factor: 14.432

Review 4.  Artificial intelligence in reproductive medicine.

Authors:  Renjie Wang; Wei Pan; Lei Jin; Yuehan Li; Yudi Geng; Chun Gao; Gang Chen; Hui Wang; Ding Ma; Shujie Liao
Journal:  Reproduction       Date:  2019-10       Impact factor: 3.906

5.  Using Deep Learning in a Monocentric Study to Characterize Maternal Immune Environment for Predicting Pregnancy Outcomes in the Recurrent Reproductive Failure Patients.

Authors:  Chunyu Huang; Zheng Xiang; Yongnu Zhang; Dao Shen Tan; Chun Kit Yip; Zhiqiang Liu; Yuye Li; Shuyi Yu; Lianghui Diao; Lap Yan Wong; Wai Lim Ling; Yong Zeng; Wenwei Tu
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2021-04-01       Impact factor: 7.561

Review 6.  Intelligent systems in obstetrics and midwifery: Applications of machine learning.

Authors:  Stavroula Barbounaki; Victoria G Vivilaki
Journal:  Eur J Midwifery       Date:  2021-12-20

7.  The testis-specific E3 ubiquitin ligase RNF133 is required for fecundity in mice.

Authors:  Kaori Nozawa; Yoshitaka Fujihara; Darius J Devlin; Ricardo E Deras; Katarzyna Kent; Irina V Larina; Kohei Umezu; Zhifeng Yu; Courtney M Sutton; Qiuji Ye; Laura K Dean; Chihiro Emori; Masahito Ikawa; Thomas X Garcia; Martin M Matzuk
Journal:  BMC Biol       Date:  2022-07-13       Impact factor: 7.364

8.  Does artificial intelligence have a role in the IVF clinic?

Authors:  Darren J X Chow; Philip Wijesinghe; Kishan Dholakia; Kylie R Dunning
Journal:  Reprod Fertil       Date:  2021-08-23
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.