| Literature DB >> 29034180 |
Anteneh Worku1, Omprakash Sahu2.
Abstract
Phaseolus vulgaris L. beans have been characterized as a nearly perfect food in all around the world. It is consider functional in terms of providing nutrients and energy to sustain daily life. Red bean contain high protein, mineral, fibres and chemically diverse micronutrient composition, which can be affected by processing. The main aim of this work is to investigate the effect of open and controlled fermentation on the proximate composition, mineral elements, antinutritional factors and flatulence- causing oligosaccharides of a domesticated bean (Anger, conscope and Loko). Open fermentation was done using endogenous microorganism present in the seed of beans, while controlled fermentation was done on autoclaved beans flour inoculated with thermophilic lactic culture which is a mixed strain culture containing Lactobacillus acidophilus, Bifidobacterium and Streptococcus thermophillus. The result shows that the open and controlled fermentation increased the protein digestibility up to 90% in all samples and 4 days of fermentation time, loko red bean was found to more suitable. The chemical compositions and mineral contain was also high as compared to remaining two verities.Entities:
Keywords: Antinutritious; Digestibility; Fermentation; Mineral; Proteins
Year: 2017 PMID: 29034180 PMCID: PMC5636019 DOI: 10.1016/j.btre.2017.09.001
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biotechnol Rep (Amst) ISSN: 2215-017X
Fig. 1Experimental steps on fermentation process of Phaseolus vulgaris (French bean).
Fig. 2(a): Effect of (a) open fermentation and (b) controlled fermentation on pH change of all three types of red beans.
Fig. 3(a) Microbial effect on flatulence-producing compounds on (a) anger red bean, (b) conscope red bean and (c) loko red bean.
Fig. 4(a) Microbial effect on reduction of (a) phytic acid, (b) tryspin, (c) tannin and (d) invitro protein in all three red beans. (For interpretation of the references to colour in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the web version of this article.)
Fig. 5Microbial effect on reduction of saponins in all three red beans.
Chemical composition in all three varieties of red beans.
| S.No | Chemical Compositions | Anger | Conscope | Loko |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Moisture | 3.1 ± 4.50 | 3.2 ± 2.50 | 3.4 ± 5.20 |
| 2 | Ash | 2.2 ± 1.90 | 2.1 ± 0.1 | 2.0 ± 0.50 |
| 3 | Fat | 10.56 ± 0.78 | 11.0 ± 0.3 | 11.2 ± 0.60 |
| 4 | Crude protein | 22.8 ± 2.25 | 23.9 ± 2.31 | 25.9 ± 1.59 |
| 5 | Crude fibre | 3.9 ± 0.51 | 4.2 ± 0.31 | 4.8 ± 0.45 |
| 6 | Carbohydrates | 44.3 ± 3.20 | 46.69 ± 4.10 | 49.7 ± 4.20 |
| 7 | Energy | 1620.23 | 1680 | 1700.56 |
| 8 | Fatty acid | 10.5 | 9.7 | 9.1 |
Mineral contained in all three varieties of red beans (per 100 g of flour).
| S.No | Minerals | Anger | Conscope | Loko |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Calcium (Ca) | 53.5 | 54.1 | 54.5 |
| 2 | Nickel (Ni) | 2.9 | 2.8 | 2.7 |
| 3 | Zinc (Zn) | 2.3 | 2.1 | 2.2 |
| 4 | Copper (Cu) | 0.7 | 0.5 | 0.2 |
| 5 | Iron (Fe) | 6.9 | 7.1 | 7.3 |
| 6 | Chromium (Cr) | 1.8 | 1.9 | 2.0 |
| 7 | Sodium (Na) | 20.5 | 21.6 | 23.26 |
| 8 | Potassium (K) | 12.5 | 13.2 | 13.9 |
| 9 | Phosphorus (P) | 2.9 | 3.0 | 3.5 |
| 10 | Magnesium (Mg) | 730 | 710 | 690 |