| Literature DB >> 29032808 |
Erick A Perez-Alday1, Jason A Thomas1, Muammar Kabir1, Golriz Sedaghat2, Nichole Rogovoy3, Eelco van Dam4, Peter van Dam4, William Woodward1, Cristina Fuss1, Maros Ferencik1, Larisa G Tereshchenko5.
Abstract
We conducted a prospective clinical study (n=14; 29% female) to assess the accuracy of a three-dimensional (3D) photography-based method of torso geometry reconstruction and body surface electrodes localization. The position of 74 body surface electrocardiographic (ECG) electrodes (diameter 5mm) was defined by two methods: 3D photography, and CT (marker diameter 2mm) or MRI (marker size 10×20mm) imaging. Bland-Altman analysis showed good agreement in X (bias -2.5 [95% limits of agreement (LoA) -19.5 to 14.3] mm), Y (bias -0.1 [95% LoA -14.1 to 13.9] mm), and Z coordinates (bias -0.8 [95% LoA -15.6 to 14.2] mm), as defined by the CT/MRI imaging, and 3D photography. The average Hausdorff distance between the two torso geometry reconstructions was 11.17±3.05mm. Thus, accurate torso geometry reconstruction using 3D photography is feasible. Body surface ECG electrodes coordinates as defined by the CT/MRI imaging, and 3D photography, are in good agreement.Entities:
Keywords: ECG imaging; ECG recording; Electrode position
Mesh:
Year: 2017 PMID: 29032808 PMCID: PMC5776048 DOI: 10.1016/j.jelectrocard.2017.08.035
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Electrocardiol ISSN: 0022-0736 Impact factor: 1.438