Krista R Kelly1, Reed M Jost2, Angie De La Cruz2, Lori Dao3, Cynthia L Beauchamp3, David Stager4, Eileen E Birch5. 1. Retina Foundation of the Southwest, Dallas, Texas. Electronic address: kkelly@rfsw.org. 2. Retina Foundation of the Southwest, Dallas, Texas. 3. ABC Eyes Pediatric Ophthalmology, PA, Dallas, Texas. 4. Pediatric Ophthalmology & Adult Strabismus, PA, Plano, Texas. 5. Retina Foundation of the Southwest, Dallas, Texas; Department of Ophthalmology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Previous studies show slow reading in strabismic amblyopia. We recently identified amblyopia, not strabismus, as the key factor in slow reading in children. No studies have focused on reading in amblyopic children without strabismus. We examined reading in anisometropic children and evaluated whether slow reading was associated with ocular motor dysfunction in children with amblyopia. METHODS: Anisometropic children (7-12 years) with or without amblyopia were compared to age-similar normal controls. Children silently read a grade-appropriate paragraph during binocular viewing. Reading rate (words/min), number of forward and regressive saccades (per 100 words) and fixation duration were recorded with the ReadAlyzer. Binocular fixation instability was also evaluated (EyeLink 1000). RESULTS: Amblyopic anisometropic children read more slowly (n = 25; mean with standard deviation, 149 ± 42 words/min) than nonamblyopic anisometropic children (n = 15; 196 ± 80 words/min; P = 0.024) and controls (n = 25; 191 ± 65 words/min; P = 0.020). Nonamblyopic anisometropic children read at a comparable rate to controls (P = 0.81). Slow reading in amblyopic anisometropic children was correlated with increased forward saccades (r = -0.84, P < 0.001), increased regressive saccades (r = -0.85, P < 0.001), and fellow eye instability during binocular viewing (r = -0.52, P = 0.019). CONCLUSIONS: Slow reading in school-age children with anisometropic amblyopia is related to increased frequency of saccades and fixation instability of the fellow eye. Further research should consider the effects of slower reading on academic performance.
BACKGROUND: Previous studies show slow reading in strabismic amblyopia. We recently identified amblyopia, not strabismus, as the key factor in slow reading in children. No studies have focused on reading in amblyopic children without strabismus. We examined reading in anisometropic children and evaluated whether slow reading was associated with ocular motor dysfunction in children with amblyopia. METHODS: Anisometropic children (7-12 years) with or without amblyopia were compared to age-similar normal controls. Children silently read a grade-appropriate paragraph during binocular viewing. Reading rate (words/min), number of forward and regressive saccades (per 100 words) and fixation duration were recorded with the ReadAlyzer. Binocular fixation instability was also evaluated (EyeLink 1000). RESULTS: Amblyopic anisometropic children read more slowly (n = 25; mean with standard deviation, 149 ± 42 words/min) than nonamblyopic anisometropic children (n = 15; 196 ± 80 words/min; P = 0.024) and controls (n = 25; 191 ± 65 words/min; P = 0.020). Nonamblyopic anisometropic children read at a comparable rate to controls (P = 0.81). Slow reading in amblyopic anisometropic children was correlated with increased forward saccades (r = -0.84, P < 0.001), increased regressive saccades (r = -0.85, P < 0.001), and fellow eye instability during binocular viewing (r = -0.52, P = 0.019). CONCLUSIONS: Slow reading in school-age children with anisometropic amblyopia is related to increased frequency of saccades and fixation instability of the fellow eye. Further research should consider the effects of slower reading on academic performance.
Authors: Esther G González; Agnes M F Wong; Ewa Niechwiej-Szwedo; Luminita Tarita-Nistor; Martin J Steinbach Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2012-08-09 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Susan A Cotter; Raymond H Chu; Danielle L Chandler; Roy W Beck; Jonathan M Holmes; Melissa L Rice; Richard W Hertle; Eileen E Birch; Pamela S Moke Journal: Am J Ophthalmol Date: 2003-10 Impact factor: 5.258
Authors: Eileen E Birch; Sarah E Morale; Reed M Jost; Angie De La Cruz; Krista R Kelly; Yi-Zhong Wang; Peter J Bex Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2016-10-01 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Eileen E Birch; Yolanda S Castañeda; Christina S Cheng-Patel; Sarah E Morale; Krista R Kelly; Cynthia L Beauchamp; Ann Webber Journal: JAMA Ophthalmol Date: 2019-02-01 Impact factor: 7.389
Authors: Elena Pinero-Pinto; Verónica Pérez-Cabezas; Concepción De-Hita-Cantalejo; Carmen Ruiz-Molinero; Estanislao Gutiérrez-Sánchez; José-Jesús Jiménez-Rejano; José-María Sánchez-González; María Carmen Sánchez-González Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2020-05-20 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Eileen E Birch; Yolanda S Castañeda; Christina S Cheng-Patel; Sarah E Morale; Krista R Kelly; Reed M Jost; Lindsey A Hudgins; David A Leske; Jonathan M Holmes Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2020-09-01 Impact factor: 4.799