BACKGROUND:Sexual partners of persons with newly diagnosed HIV infection require HIV counseling, testing and, if necessary, evaluation for therapy. However, many African countries do not have a standardized protocol for partner notification, and the effectiveness of partner notification has not been evaluated in developing countries . METHODS:Individuals with newly diagnosed HIV infection presenting to sexually transmitted infection clinics in Lilongwe, Malawi, were randomized to 1 of 3 methods of partner notification: passive referral, contract referral, or provider referral. The passive referral group was responsible for notifying their partners themselves. The contract referral group was given seven days to notify their partners, after which a health care provider contacted partners who had not reported for counseling and testing. In the provider referral group, a health care provider notified partners directly. RESULTS:Two hundred forty-five index patients named 302 sexual partners and provided locator information for 252. Among locatable partners, 107 returned for HIV counseling and testing; 20 of 82 [24%; 95% confidence interval (CI): 15% to 34%] partners returned in the passive referral arm, 45 of 88 (51%; 95% CI: 41% to 62%) in the contract referral arm, and 42 of 82 (51%; 95% CI: 40% to 62%) in the provider referral arm (P < 0.001). Among returning partners (n = 107), 67 (64%) of were HIV infected with 54 (81%) newly diagnosed. DISCUSSION: This study provides the first evidence of the effectiveness of partner notification in sub-Saharan Africa. Active partner notification was feasible, acceptable, and effective among sexually transmitted infections clinic patients. Partner notification will increase early referral to care and facilitate risk reduction among high-risk uninfected partners.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: Sexual partners of persons with newly diagnosed HIV infection require HIV counseling, testing and, if necessary, evaluation for therapy. However, many African countries do not have a standardized protocol for partner notification, and the effectiveness of partner notification has not been evaluated in developing countries . METHODS: Individuals with newly diagnosed HIV infection presenting to sexually transmitted infection clinics in Lilongwe, Malawi, were randomized to 1 of 3 methods of partner notification: passive referral, contract referral, or provider referral. The passive referral group was responsible for notifying their partners themselves. The contract referral group was given seven days to notify their partners, after which a health care provider contacted partners who had not reported for counseling and testing. In the provider referral group, a health care provider notified partners directly. RESULTS: Two hundred forty-five index patients named 302 sexual partners and provided locator information for 252. Among locatable partners, 107 returned for HIV counseling and testing; 20 of 82 [24%; 95% confidence interval (CI): 15% to 34%] partners returned in the passive referral arm, 45 of 88 (51%; 95% CI: 41% to 62%) in the contract referral arm, and 42 of 82 (51%; 95% CI: 40% to 62%) in the provider referral arm (P < 0.001). Among returning partners (n = 107), 67 (64%) of were HIV infected with 54 (81%) newly diagnosed. DISCUSSION: This study provides the first evidence of the effectiveness of partner notification in sub-Saharan Africa. Active partner notification was feasible, acceptable, and effective among sexually transmitted infections clinic patients. Partner notification will increase early referral to care and facilitate risk reduction among high-risk uninfected partners.
Authors: Rebecca Bunnell; Alex Opio; Joshua Musinguzi; Wilford Kirungi; Paul Ekwaru; Vinod Mishra; Wolfgang Hladik; Jessica Kafuko; Elizabeth Madraa; Jonathan Mermin Journal: AIDS Date: 2008-03-12 Impact factor: 4.177
Authors: Susan Allen; Etienne Karita; Elwyn Chomba; David L Roth; Joseph Telfair; Isaac Zulu; Leslie Clark; Nzali Kancheya; Martha Conkling; Rob Stephenson; Brigitte Bekan; Katherine Kimbrell; Steven Dunham; Faith Henderson; Moses Sinkala; Michel Carael; Alan Haworth Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2007-12-11 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: Marielle S Goyette; Peter M Mutiti; David Bukusi; Beatrice M Wamuti; Felix A Otieno; Peter Cherutich; Matthew R Golden; Hans Spiegel; Barbra A Richardson; Anne Ngʼangʼa; Carey Farquhar Journal: J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr Date: 2018-05-01 Impact factor: 3.731
Authors: Marielle Goyette; Beatrice Muthoni Wamuti; Mercy Owuor; David Bukusi; Peter Mutiti Maingi; Felix Abuna Otieno; Peter Cherutich; Anne Ng'ang'a; Carey Farquhar Journal: AIDS Patient Care STDS Date: 2016-11 Impact factor: 5.078
Authors: Sarah E Rutstein; Lillian B Brown; Andrea K Biddle; Stephanie B Wheeler; Gift Kamanga; Pearson Mmodzi; Naomi Nyirenda; Innocent Mofolo; Nora E Rosenberg; Irving F Hoffman; William C Miller Journal: Health Policy Plan Date: 2013-01-15 Impact factor: 3.344