Literature DB >> 29022070

Surgical Resection for Pulmonary Carcinoid: Long-Term Results of Multicentric Study-The Importance of Pathological N Status, More Than We Thought.

Giacomo Cusumano1, Ludovic Fournel2,3, Salvatore Strano4, Diane Damotte5, Marie Christine Charpentier2,5, Antonio Galia6, Alberto Terminella7, Maurizio Nicolosi4, Jean Francois Regnard2,3, Marco Alifano2,3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Histological subdivision into typical (TC) and atypical (AC) is crucial for treatment and prognosis of lung carcinoids but can be also very challenging, even for experts. In this study, we aimed to strengthen or reduce the prognostic value of several pathological, clinical, or per-operative factors some of which are still controversial.
METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed clinical records related to 195 patients affected by TC (159) or AC (36) surgically treated between 2000 and 2014, in three different centers. Survival and subtypes comparison analyses were performed to identify potential prognostic factors.
RESULTS: TCs showed a lower rate of nodal involvement than ACs (N0 = 94.9%; N1 = 1.9%; N2 = 3.2% in typical and N0 = 63.8%; N1 = 16.6%; N2 = 19.4% in atypical carcinoids, respectively, p < 0.0001). Long-term oncological results of resected carcinoids were significantly better in TCs than ACs with higher 5- and 10-year overall survival rates (97.2 and 88.2% vs. 77.9 and 68.2%, respectively; p = 0.001) and disease-free survival rates (98.2 and 90.3% in typical and 80.8 and 70.7% atypical carcinoids, respectively; p = 0.001). Risk factors analysis revealed that AC subtype [HR 4.33 (95% CI 1.72-8.03), p = 0.002], pathological nodal involvement [HR 3.05 (95% CI 1.77-5.26), p < 0.0001], and higher SUVmax [HR 4.33 (95% CI 1.03-7.18), p = 0.002] were independently and pejoratively associated with overall survival. Factors associated with a higher risk of recurrence were AC subtype [HR 6.13 (95% CI 1.13-18.86), p = 0.002]; nodal involvement [HR 5.48 (95% CI 2.85-10.51), p < 0.0001]; higher Ki67 expression level [HR 1.09 (95% CI 1.01-1.20), p = 0.047]; and SUVmax [HR 1.83 (95% CI 1.04-3.23), p = 0.035].
CONCLUSION: Surgery for lung carcinoids allows satisfactory oncological results which mainly depend on carcinoid subtype dichotomy, pathological nodal status, and SUVmax.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bronchial carcinoid; Lung cancer; Lung resection; Lymphadenectomy; Neuroendocrine lung tumors; Surgery

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29022070     DOI: 10.1007/s00408-017-0056-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lung        ISSN: 0341-2040            Impact factor:   2.584


  30 in total

1.  Typical and atypical bronchopulmonary carcinoid tumors on FDG PET/CT imaging.

Authors:  Myriam Wartski; Jean-Louis Alberini; François Leroy-Ladurie; Vincent De Montpreville; Charles Nguyen; Carine Corone; Philippe Dartevelle; Alain Paul Pecking
Journal:  Clin Nucl Med       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 7.794

2.  Typical bronchial carcinoid tumors: focus on surgical management.

Authors:  Stefano Cafarotti; Alfredo Cesario; Stefano Margaritora; Pierluigi Granone
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2012-12-25       Impact factor: 4.330

3.  Bronchial carcinoid tumors: surgical management and long-term outcome.

Authors:  Pier Luigi Filosso; Ottavio Rena; Giovanni Donati; Caterina Casadio; Enrico Ruffini; Esther Papalia; Alberto Oliaro; Giuliano Maggi
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 5.209

4.  Is sublobar resection sufficient for carcinoid tumors?

Authors:  Sai Yendamuri; David Gold; Vijay Jayaprakash; Elisabeth Dexter; Chukwumere Nwogu; Todd Demmy
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2011-06-24       Impact factor: 4.330

5.  Natural history of typical pulmonary carcinoid tumors: a comparison of nonsurgical and surgical treatment.

Authors:  Dan J Raz; Rebecca A Nelson; Frederic W Grannis; Jae Y Kim
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 9.410

6.  An analysis of 8305 cases of carcinoid tumors.

Authors:  I M Modlin; A Sandor
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1997-02-15       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 7.  One hundred years after "carcinoid": epidemiology of and prognostic factors for neuroendocrine tumors in 35,825 cases in the United States.

Authors:  James C Yao; Manal Hassan; Alexandria Phan; Cecile Dagohoy; Colleen Leary; Jeannette E Mares; Eddie K Abdalla; Jason B Fleming; Jean-Nicolas Vauthey; Asif Rashid; Douglas B Evans
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2008-06-20       Impact factor: 44.544

8.  Bronchial carcinoid tumors: nodal status and long-term survival after resection.

Authors:  Giuseppe Cardillo; Francesco Sera; Marco Di Martino; Paolo Graziano; Roberto Giunti; Luigi Carbone; Francesco Facciolo; Massimo Martelli
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 4.330

9.  Long-term survival following bronchotomy for polypoid bronchial carcinoid tumours.

Authors:  A I Taştepe; I C Kurul; S Demircan; S T Liman; S Kaya; G Cetin
Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 4.191

10.  Risk factors associated with neuroendocrine tumors: A U.S.-based case-control study.

Authors:  Manal M Hassan; Alexandria Phan; Donghui Li; Cecile G Dagohoy; Colleen Leary; James C Yao
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2008-08-15       Impact factor: 7.396

View more
  10 in total

1.  External Validation of a Prognostic Score for Survival in Lung Carcinoids.

Authors:  Marco Chiappetta; Diomira Tabacco; Carolina Sassorossi; Isabella Sperduti; Giacomo Cusumano; Alberto Terminella; Ludovic Fournel; Marco Alifano; Francesco Guerrera; Pier Luigi Filosso; Samanta Nicosia; Filippo Gallina; Francesco Facciolo; Stefano Margaritora; Filippo Lococo
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-25       Impact factor: 6.575

2.  A single-institution retrospective analysis of metachronous and synchronous metastatic bronchial neuroendocrine tumors.

Authors:  Marta Peri; Edoardo Botteri; Eleonora Pisa; Filippo De Marinis; Antonio Ungaro; Francesca Spada; Chiara Maria Grana; Roberto Gasparri; Lorenzo Spaggiari; Nicole Romentz; Giuseppe Badalamenti; Antonio Russo; Nicola Fazio
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 2.895

3.  Value of [68Ga]Ga-somatostatin receptor PET/CT in the grading of pulmonary neuroendocrine (carcinoid) tumours and the detection of disseminated disease: single-centre pathology-based analysis and review of the literature.

Authors:  Anne-Leen Deleu; Annouschka Laenen; Herbert Decaluwé; Birgit Weynand; Christophe Dooms; Walter De Wever; Sander Jentjens; Karolien Goffin; Johan Vansteenkiste; Koen Van Laere; Paul De Leyn; Kristiaan Nackaerts; Christophe M Deroose
Journal:  EJNMMI Res       Date:  2022-05-07       Impact factor: 3.434

4.  Assessment of the prognostic factors in patients with pulmonary carcinoid tumor: a population-based study.

Authors:  Yiwei Huang; Xiaodong Yang; Tao Lu; Ming Li; Mengnan Zhao; Xingyu Yang; Ke Ma; Shuai Wang; Cheng Zhan; Yu Liu; Qun Wang
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2018-05-07       Impact factor: 4.452

Review 5.  Advances in the Diagnosis and Management of Well-Differentiated Neuroendocrine Neoplasms.

Authors:  Johannes Hofland; Gregory Kaltsas; Wouter W de Herder
Journal:  Endocr Rev       Date:  2020-04-01       Impact factor: 19.871

Review 6.  Orthopedia Homeobox (OTP) in Pulmonary Neuroendocrine Tumors: The Diagnostic Value and Possible Molecular Interactions.

Authors:  Laura Moonen; Jules Derks; Anne-Marie Dingemans; Ernst-Jan Speel
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2019-10-08       Impact factor: 6.639

Review 7.  Follow-Up Recommendations after Curative Resection of Well-Differentiated Neuroendocrine Tumours: Review of Current Evidence and Clinical Practice.

Authors:  Angela Lamarca; Hamish Clouston; Jorge Barriuso; Mairéad G McNamara; Melissa Frizziero; Was Mansoor; Richard A Hubner; Prakash Manoharan; Sarah O'Dwyer; Juan W Valle
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2019-10-05       Impact factor: 4.241

8.  Utility of KI-67 as a prognostic biomarker in pulmonary neuroendocrine neoplasms: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Salma Naheed; Chloe Holden; Lulu Tanno; Linda Pattini; Neil W Pearce; Bryan Green; Eleanor Jaynes; Judith Cave; Christian H Ottensmeier; Giuseppe Pelosi
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2022-03-03       Impact factor: 2.692

9.  A Multimodal Biomarker Predicts Dissemination of Bronchial Carcinoid.

Authors:  Ellen M B P Reuling; Dwayne D Naves; Pim C Kortman; Mark A M Broeckaert; Peter W Plaisier; Chris Dickhoff; Johannes M A Daniels; Teodora Radonic
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-30       Impact factor: 6.575

10.  Sublobar resection versus lobectomy for patients with stage T1-2N0M0 pulmonary typical carcinoid tumours: a population-based propensity score matching analysis.

Authors:  Hao Yang; Tonghua Mei
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2022-08-03
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.