OBJECTIVE: We sought to determine the variables influencing long-term survival of patients treated for bronchial carcinoid tumors. METHODS: A retrospective, mono-institutional review of patients subjected to surgical treatment since 1977 was conducted. RESULTS: Over 22 years, 126 patients with a final histologic diagnosis of bronchial carcinoid tumors were assessed for surgery. The group comprised 72 men (57%) and 54 women (43%) with a mean age at presentation of 47 +/- 16 years (range 11-77 years). Symptoms were present in 65 (53%) patients. Operations included lobectomy or bilobectomy in 88 (with 4 bronchoplastic procedures), pneumonectomy in 15, segmentectomy in 3, wedge resection in 16, and bronchial sleeve resection in 3 patients. One patient (0.7%) died in the perioperative period. Eighty-two patients (65%) had typical and 44 (35%) had atypical carcinoid tumors. Postoperative staging was complete for 113 of 126 patients (13 patients did not undergo lymphadenectomy): 90 patients had stage I disease, 6 had stage II, 15 had stage III, and 2 had stage IV disease. A typical subtype was stage I in 70 and more advanced (II-IV) in 5, whereas an atypical subtype was stage I in 20 and more advanced in 18 (P <.05). Mean follow-up was 99 +/- 73 months (range 6-282 months) during which 19 (15%) patients died (12 of recurrent disease). Recurrent tumor developed in 4 (5.5%) of 72 patients affected by typical subtypes and 8 (19.5%) of 41 by atypical subtypes with complete follow-up. Overall survival at 15 years was 74%; survival related to histologic type and nodal status at 15 years was significant (P <.05). CONCLUSIONS: Biologic behavior and prognosis for bronchial carcinoid tumors are better than for other lung cancers. Surgical treatment requires radical excision and lymph node sampling. Survival and long-term outcome are significantly related to the histologic type, nodal status, and pathologic stage.
OBJECTIVE: We sought to determine the variables influencing long-term survival of patients treated for bronchial carcinoid tumors. METHODS: A retrospective, mono-institutional review of patients subjected to surgical treatment since 1977 was conducted. RESULTS: Over 22 years, 126 patients with a final histologic diagnosis of bronchial carcinoid tumors were assessed for surgery. The group comprised 72 men (57%) and 54 women (43%) with a mean age at presentation of 47 +/- 16 years (range 11-77 years). Symptoms were present in 65 (53%) patients. Operations included lobectomy or bilobectomy in 88 (with 4 bronchoplastic procedures), pneumonectomy in 15, segmentectomy in 3, wedge resection in 16, and bronchial sleeve resection in 3 patients. One patient (0.7%) died in the perioperative period. Eighty-two patients (65%) had typical and 44 (35%) had atypical carcinoid tumors. Postoperative staging was complete for 113 of 126 patients (13 patients did not undergo lymphadenectomy): 90 patients had stage I disease, 6 had stage II, 15 had stage III, and 2 had stage IV disease. A typical subtype was stage I in 70 and more advanced (II-IV) in 5, whereas an atypical subtype was stage I in 20 and more advanced in 18 (P <.05). Mean follow-up was 99 +/- 73 months (range 6-282 months) during which 19 (15%) patients died (12 of recurrent disease). Recurrent tumor developed in 4 (5.5%) of 72 patients affected by typical subtypes and 8 (19.5%) of 41 by atypical subtypes with complete follow-up. Overall survival at 15 years was 74%; survival related to histologic type and nodal status at 15 years was significant (P <.05). CONCLUSIONS: Biologic behavior and prognosis for bronchial carcinoid tumors are better than for other lung cancers. Surgical treatment requires radical excision and lymph node sampling. Survival and long-term outcome are significantly related to the histologic type, nodal status, and pathologic stage.
Authors: Ryan F Herde; Kristine E Kokeny; Chakravarthy B Reddy; Wallace L Akerley; Nan Hu; Jonathan P Boltax; Ying J Hitchcock Journal: Am J Clin Oncol Date: 2018-01 Impact factor: 2.339
Authors: J K Ramage; A H G Davies; J Ardill; N Bax; M Caplin; A Grossman; R Hawkins; A M McNicol; N Reed; R Sutton; R Thakker; S Aylwin; D Breen; K Britton; K Buchanan; P Corrie; A Gillams; V Lewington; D McCance; K Meeran; A Watkinson Journal: Gut Date: 2005-06 Impact factor: 23.059
Authors: Miguel Angel Cañizares; Eva M García-Fontán; José Eduardo Rivo; Ana Gonzalez-Piñeiro Journal: Clin Transl Oncol Date: 2005-06 Impact factor: 3.405
Authors: S Pusceddu; L Catena; M Valente; R Buzzoni; B Formisano; M Del Vecchio; M Ducceschi; L Tavecchio; A Fabbri; E Bajetta Journal: J Thorac Dis Date: 2010-03 Impact factor: 2.895
Authors: Stefano Avanzini; L Pio; P Buffa; S Panigada; O Sacco; A Pini-Prato; G Mattioli; G Bisio; A Garaventa; A Rossi Giovanni; Vincenzo Jasonni Journal: Pediatr Surg Int Date: 2011-06-17 Impact factor: 1.827