| Literature DB >> 35241462 |
Salma Naheed1, Chloe Holden2, Lulu Tanno3, Linda Pattini4, Neil W Pearce5, Bryan Green6, Eleanor Jaynes7, Judith Cave2, Christian H Ottensmeier8, Giuseppe Pelosi9.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Ki-67, a marker of cellular proliferation, is associated with prognosis across a wide range of tumours, including gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs), lymphoma, urothelial tumours and breast carcinomas. Its omission from the classification system of pulmonary NENs is controversial. This systematic review sought to assess whether Ki-67 is a prognostic biomarker in lung NENs and, if feasible, proceed to a meta-analysis. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Medline (Ovid), Embase, Scopus and the Cochrane library were searched for studies published prior to 28 February 2019 and investigating the role of Ki-67 in lung NENs. Eligible studies were those that included more than 20 patients and provided details of survival outcomes, namely, HRs with CIs according to Ki-67 percentage. Studies not available as a full text or without an English manuscript were excluded. This study was prospectively registered with PROSPERO.Entities:
Keywords: endocrine tumours; pathology; respiratory tract tumours
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35241462 PMCID: PMC8895948 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-041961
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMJ Open ISSN: 2044-6055 Impact factor: 2.692
Figure 1Study selection.
Main characteristics of all studies included in the meta-analysis
| Author (year) | Trial design (study centres) | Number of subjects | Histological subtypes | Age range | Gender | Stage | Antibody | Methodology for calculating Ki-67 | Median length of follow-up (months) | Ki-67 cut-off thresholds (%) | Outcome measure | HR (95% CI) from univariate analyses |
| Cusumano | Retrospective multicentre study (France, Italy) | 195 | TC (159); AC (36) | 52.94 (TC); 60.16 (AC) (mean values) | 89:106 | I=163; II=16; III=16; IV=0 | NR | NR | 75 (mean) | NR | OS (Death HR) | 1.07 (0.97 to 1.17) |
| Rego | Retrospective, multicentre study (Brazil) | 82 | SCLC (82) | 35–81 (mean 59) | 48:34 | I=0; II=0; III=6; IV=76 | MIB-1 (1:1000) | Hotspot method; otherwise not specified | 10.3 | 55 | OS | 1.15 (0.70 to 1.89) |
| Marchio | Retrospective multicentre study | 239 | TC (171); AC (68) | NR | 100:139 | NR | NR | Manual counting of >1000 cells | NR | 4 | OS | 4.31 (1.624 to 11.45) |
| Filosso | Retrospective, single centre study (Italy) | 126 (NB 110 included in Ki-67 analysis) | TC (83); AC (43).(In Ki-67 analysis TC (79); AC (31)) | 15–82 (mean 60) | 52:74 | I=90; II=18; III=16; IV=2; X=1 | Anti–Ki-67 antibody | NR | 60 | 6 | OS | 2.08 (1.02 to 4.27) |
| Rindi | Retrospective, multicentre study (Italy) | 399 | TC (113); AC (84); LCNEC (94); SCLC (108) | 63.26 (median) | 245:154 | I=183; II=90; III=76; IV=17; X=33 | MIB-1 antibody | Computer-assisted manual count method 500–2000 cells | 70.72 | <4 vs 4–20 | OS | 1.26 (0.84 to 1.89) |
| Clay | Retrospective, single centre study (UK) | 94 (NB survival analysis performed on 84) | TC (75); AC (19) (NB survival analysis performed 67 TC, 17 AC patients) | 21–83 (median 60.5) | 39:55 | NR | MIB-1 antibody (1:50) | Manual count method 500–2000 cells in hot spot | 35 | NR | RFS | 1.47 (1.25 to 1.74) |
| Vesterinen | Retrospective, single centre study (Finland) | 133 (129 included in Ki-67 analysis) | TC (100); AC (33) | 47:86 | NR | MIB-1 antibody (1:100) | Manual and automated counting of 2000 cells | 9.6 | 2.5 | Disease-specific mortality | 10.51 (2.12 to 52.13) |
DFS, disease free survival; F, female; M, male; NR, not recorded; OS, overall survival; RFS, recurrence free survival; TTP, time to progression.
Quality assessment of included studies utilising the (modified) Newcastle-Ottawa Scale
| Author (year) | Representativeness of cohort | Adequate definition of cases | Assessment of exposure | Outcome of interest not present at start of study | Comparibility on the basis of the design or analysis | Assessment of outcome (death or recurrence) | Adequacy of median follow-up for outcome (>2 years) | Adequacy of follow-up of cases (<20% or reported) | Total quality score |
| Cusumano | ✰ | ✰ | ✰ | – | ✰✰ | ✰ | ✰ | ✰ | 8 |
| Rego | ✰ | ✰ | ✰ | – | ✰ | ✰ | – | ✰ | 6 |
| Marchio | ✰ | ✰ | ✰ | – | ✰✰ | ✰ | – | ✰ | 7 |
| Filosso | ✰ | ✰ | ✰ | – | ✰✰ | ✰ | ✰ | ✰ | 8 |
| Rindi | ✰ | ✰ | ✰ | – | ✰✰ | ✰ | ✰ | ✰ | 8 |
| Clay | ✰ | ✰ | ✰ | – | ✰ | ✰ | ✰ | ✰ | 7 |
| Vesterinen | ✰ | ✰ | ✰ | – | ✰✰ | ✰ | – | ✰ | 7 |
Figure 2Forest plot of studies evaluating the association between Ki-67 expression and overall survival in pulmonary neuroendocrine neoplasms.
Figure 3Forest plot of studies evaluating the association between Ki-67 expression and recurrence-free survival in pulmonary neuroendocrine neoplasms.